Big Coffers and Rising Voice at Conservative Group (Freedom’s Watch)

NY Times ^ | September 30, 2007 | DON VAN NATTA Jr.

[neverdem]

Freedom’s Watch, a deep-pocketed conservative group led by two former senior White House officials, made an audacious debut in late August when it began a $15 million advertising campaign designed to maintain Congressional support for President Bush’s troop increase in Iraq.

Founded this summer by a dozen wealthy conservatives, the nonprofit group is set apart from most advocacy groups by the immense wealth of its core group of benefactors, its intention to far outspend its rivals and its ambition to pursue a wide-ranging agenda. Its next target: Iran policy.

Next month, Freedom’s Watch will sponsor a private forum of 20 experts on radical Islam that is expected to make the case that Iran poses a direct threat to the security of the United States, according to several benefactors of the group.

Although the group declined to identify the experts, several were invited from the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington research group with close ties to the White House. Some institute scholars have advocated a more confrontational policy to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, including keeping military action as an option.

Last week, a Freedom’s Watch newspaper advertisement called President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran “a terrorist.” The group is considering a national advertising campaign focused on Iran, a senior benefactor said, though Matt S. David, a spokesman for the group, declined to comment on those plans.

“If Hitler’s warnings were heeded when he wrote ‘Mein Kampf,’ he could have been stopped,” said Bradley Blakeman, 49, the president of Freedom’s Watch and a former deputy assistant to Mr. Bush. “Ahmadinejad is giving all the same kind of warning signs to us, and the region — he wants the destruction of the United States and the destruction of Israel.”

With a forceful message and a roster of wealthy benefactors, Freedom’s Watch has...

[rockinqsranch]

Bump for later read, bedtime.

[Rudder]

Do you mean these guys?

[neverdem]

Thanks for the link.

[LjubivojeRadosavljevic]

“If Hitler’s warnings were heeded when he wrote ‘Mein Kampf,’ he could have been stopped,”

Stopped by whom(?) - given the Zeitgeist.

[Windflier]

Awesome! It’s about time somebody from our side stepped up to the libtards and said, “that’s not a knife - THIS is a knife!”

I’m going to flow some help their way as soon as I can manage it. I’m thrilled they’re here.

And can you believe that this was printed in the NY Times???

[SuziQ]

Several of the group’s spots suggested that Iraq, rather than Al Qaeda, was behind the Sept. 11 attacks, even though the independent Sept. 11 commission investigation and other inquiries found no evidence of Iraq’s involvement.

They New York Times keeps pushing that nonsense that "Bush claimed that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks", and unfortunately too many people believe it. Here, they're trying to tar FreedomsWatch with the same brush.

Have they ever done a 'behind the scenes' look at MoveOn.org, like this one? I seriesly doubt it!

[federal]

the nonprofit group is set apart from most advocacy groups by the immense wealth of its core group of benefactors

Yeah right unlike all the liberal/socialist foundations, Soros, Lewis etc.

No the only thing that is different about this group is they actually care about the USA and the NYslimes will write a expose on them.