Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are Ron Paul Detractors so Frightened? (American Chronicle)
American Chronicle ^ | 9/26/07 | Szandor Blestman

Posted on 09/26/2007 11:45:25 AM PDT by traviskicks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last
To: ravingnutter

Also, just to let you know, campaign staffers who are mods on that forum have officially said the campaign does not like the idea of stamping bills.


41 posted on 09/26/2007 12:50:53 PM PDT by mnehring (!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

My Boston Terrier,while admittedly on the gassy side, is more trustworthy to guard my house than Ron.


42 posted on 09/26/2007 12:51:30 PM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr; isom35

Spock has Libertarian Derangement Syndrome? Did he get it from those plants that sprayed pollen in the faces of the crew?


43 posted on 09/26/2007 12:52:29 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

I guess people are scared of this traitor sitting in congress never mind the oval office


44 posted on 09/26/2007 12:54:30 PM PDT by italianquaker (Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Here is a perfect example for you. In this thread, I attempted to ask a question that would bring the thread to an actual debate on Presidential powers. Not only did no Paul supporters respond on the thread (only SJackson responded to the question), one Paul supporter actually e-mailed me a two word response.

Paul supporters never respond to specifics.

I admit, I only ask for responses because I'm terrified by the fire and brimstone of the all knowing one who channels the Founders, but I only get that in soundbites.

A couple threads from four years ago below, on one on Paul's famous pronouncements.

I think it's fair to say he didn't get much support here then. People have been afraid of the Paul intellect, and the intellect of his supporters for years. Thus they disagree.

We've Been Neo-Conned!

Neo-conned

45 posted on 09/26/2007 12:54:31 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
just, damn...

46 posted on 09/26/2007 12:59:07 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
civil enough. :)

However, I'm not sure what they are doing is illegal: http://www.bep.treas.gov/document.cfm/18/104

I am not a part of this and I doubt the central HQ, who really have very little control over the movement are involved.

And as far as being irrelevant, I think little by little they are adding support:


47 posted on 09/26/2007 1:01:07 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Ha...their justification is that it doesn’t make them unusable? Wrong...I won’t accept one from any cashier, it is too embarrassing to spend them anywhere. I don’t want anyone thinking I would support a cut and run politician.
48 posted on 09/26/2007 1:02:15 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I need to bookmark that second one.. ouch.


49 posted on 09/26/2007 1:03:10 PM PDT by mnehring (!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Ron Paul threads...
50 posted on 09/26/2007 1:06:03 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Outstanding chart.

Paul's momentum beats Thompson by 10 to 1, everyone else by 100 to 1 or better.

He will be the nominee.

Should he not lose in a very close race, is there any reason I should consider you anything but a propagandist or political cretan?

Or, since you appear to be using gambling charts, are you a tout?

51 posted on 09/26/2007 1:06:43 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Ron Paul 2008!

Why are those in power so afraid?

1)Abolish FRB
2)Abolish IRS
3)Get US out of UN-UN out of US
4)Abolish extra-constitutional government departments.

There is no other candidate from either party who even comes close.

52 posted on 09/26/2007 1:07:29 PM PDT by hschliemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

See 47. I’ve been aware of the fact that you can gamble on these things, but haven’t really thought much about it. An interesting market, unregulated as it should be, it’s gambling. Kudus to those who make money on Paul


53 posted on 09/26/2007 1:09:43 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: hschliemann
Maybe I'll ask you because I haven't gotten an answer on any other Paul threads about this.

What Constitutional authority President Paul would have to eliminate the CIA, DEA, NSA, FBI, NEA, FDA, FTC, IRS, and all the other things he says he will eliminate. Wouldn̢۪t that have to originate in Congress?

If he leaves Congress, who is left to sponsor a bill to do these things?

54 posted on 09/26/2007 1:11:57 PM PDT by mnehring (!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I’m not sure I understand your post...

Paul’s support is much lower than the front runners, so despite that his odds are doubling and trippling, he is at present only between 5-6% odds to win the Republican nomination, however, a percentage likely to increase in the future as judged by the past.

I used a gambling chart since they are more generally the best ‘objective’ predictors of these sorts of things.


55 posted on 09/26/2007 1:12:37 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
An on-line poll is not an indication of anything, they can be easily skewed by voters. And as I explained on another post, I personally consider them rendered unusable (which falls under the legal statute) as I won't accept one from any cashier. To be frank, it is embarrassing as I don't want anyone thinking I support what I consider to be his totally insane views and I consider it to be extremely childish if not outright vandalism.
56 posted on 09/26/2007 1:14:40 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

I guess it is possible.


57 posted on 09/26/2007 1:16:46 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Vote for the Republican nominee.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

>> Why do Ron Paul supporters think that disagreeing with their candidate means that people are “frightened” of him?

Well, I can only speak for myself... but the thought of Ron Paul as POTUS /does/ frighten me!

(’course it’ll never happen...)


58 posted on 09/26/2007 1:17:00 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Only 20% of america (mostly liberal code-pinko types) believe in “just coming home.” He doesn’t even believe in a gradual pullout, but cutting and running immediately. The vast majority of the american people do not agree.

Ron Paul doesn’t understand the war on terror, or doesn’t take it seriously at all. Probably both.

This is the most important battle of the post-cold-war era, and Ron Paul and his liberal web spammers don’t want to not only fight it, but want to run away from it with their tails between their legs. They not only want to lose, they want to lose completely and in the most embarrassing way possible.

The scary part about a Ron paul presidency is that the one issue that the president has the most leverage is foreign policy, and ron paul’s foreign policy is, frankly, stupid and frightening.


59 posted on 09/26/2007 1:17:23 PM PDT by Tears of a Clown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
I used a gambling chart since they are more generally the best ‘objective’ predictors of these sorts of things.

What sort of things? If a gambling chart posits Paul as a 10 to 1 over Thompson and 100 to 1 over everyone else that's great.

I wish you success, and if I'm discussing gambling on the primaries, perhaps I'll listen to you.

As a vote predictor, in the real world, I think your chart is less than worthless.

We'll see who's right.

To those who lose money on Paul, you learned a lesson, I hope you didn't mortgage the homestead, or the IPOD.

60 posted on 09/26/2007 1:17:43 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson