"MOVEON.ORG! CODE PINK! ANSWER!!!!!"
Posted on 09/16/2007 2:18:45 AM PDT by traviskicks
More than 1,000 people gathered Saturday at the Union Pacific Depot in Salt Lake City to rally behind U.S. Rep. Ron Paul in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination.
Paul, an obstetrician from Texas, was impressed with the turnout.
"Wow. If they only knew you existed over in Washington, they'd change things over there," he said as he greeted the cheering crowd.
Paul spoke fervently of his support of smaller government, including the abolition of agencies, such as the Internal Revenue Service, and of his support for strictly following the Constitution. He also spoke out against the war in Iraq and any pre-emptive military action.
"Because of our careless attitude about foreign policy and how we go to war, we have allowed our government to build an American world empire," he said. "We are not an empire. We're a republic."
Paul's stances on such topics are "clearly proven" in his voting record, which has earned him the nickname of "Dr. No" in the House of Representatives, said supporter Ronald Levine Saturday.
"I tell people not to listen to what a candidate says before an election or what he does," he said. "I tell them to look at what he has consistently done for the past 20 years."
That voting record is what drives his grass-roots supporters, said Mark Hudson of Syracuse. "He is the only candidate who attracts everyone from libertarians to constitutional conservatives to true conservatives," Hudson said.
Paul visited Utah for the free rally and for a $1,000-a-plate brunch that drew fewer than 20 supporters and a $2,000-per-plate dinner. He is the eighth presidential candidate to visit Utah, the fourth Republican. Paul had raised about $13,000 in Utah as of the June 30 filing, according to the Federal Elections Commission.
Though polls show Paul garnering an average of only 2 percent of potential voters, many of his supporters believe the polls don't accurately show how many people support him.
"He's the only candidate I've seen homemade signs for," said Tom Salt, who is studying mechanical engineering at Brigham Young University.
Salt sees many young people supporting Paul.
"We look at his principles and we're too young to be cynical about his chances," Salt said. The mainstream media has not treated Paul fairly, said Jed Hardman of Springville, and neither have some of the other Republicans in the race, pointing to Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney "openly mocking" Paul after debates.
"They're afraid because as soon as such a true conservative emerges, one who is anti-abortion and has conservative views on taxes, they're going to lose," he said.
If true, an absolutely AMAZING turnout.
I hope you like .JPGs and abuse...
How is your boy doing in the polls, my friend? Oh, btw, thousands gathered to see Fred this week in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida and Tennessee. That article you linked to was a small meetup group of Fredheads in Utah, which was not a campaign event. But you knew that already, didn’t you? Was the “uniform of the day” tie-dye & Birckenstocks or brown shirts and hob nailed boots at that Ron Paul rally? Just curious.
LOL...good one!
Really pathetic numbers considering that 900 of the 1000 are probably Moveon.org stooges hoping to "fracture the Conservative base" by backing a Trojan Horse candidate Paul all the while knowing they would NEVER actually vote for Paul in a General Election
So has Congressman Paul explain his hypocrisy on Earmarks yet? Explained why anyone should take a supposed “limited Govt Conservative” who has $400 million in pork barrel spending to his name seriously? Especially since he gets 1% or less in any serious poll?
Care to put money on who will win the GOP nomination re Thompson or RuPaul?
So how many were bused in from out of state? And how many are lib Rats trying to help Paul from the left?
Yeah, someone thought the organizers said “The mormon candidate will be here.” when what was said was, “The moron candidate will be here.”
LMAO! Sure, with 2% of popular suport, and by whopping 20 person turn outs at $1,000 a plate dinners. With such a huge ground swell of support like that, how can he loose? /s On the bright side, it's good to know only 2% of those calling themselves Republicans are nuts.
"MOVEON.ORG! CODE PINK! ANSWER!!!!!"
“””I tell people not to listen to what a candidate says before an election or what he does,” he said. “I tell them to look at what he has consistently done for the past 20 years.”””
Which of course in Ron Paul’s case is absolutely nothing.
I know, don’t bother you with the reality of who Paul is, or who makes up the vast bulk of his support. You worship him because he pushes your emotional hot buttons and that is all that matters to you Paulbots
I am beginning to have a lot of doubt about those polls. I have been following the meetup group numbers for a little over 2 weeks and his supporters there have increased over 20% in that time span.
Most people who can afford $1,000 a plate dinners are in favor of keeping the status quo. Many people in the meetup groups are contributing more than $1,000 in time, materials, and effort. E.g., I started a meetup group and a person offered me a prime spot on a busy road for a bill board supporting RP. All we have to do is make the sign.
The other thing you have to consider is how much it costs the other candidates to get a crowd at their speeches. It costs RP very little.
He is also starting to get some press coverage. The other story posted today about his talk in Seattle had a standing room only crowd. In the comments after the article, several people who were there said that the reported number of people attending (200+) was off by at least 50% (400+).
One percenter, Ron Paul.
Wow someone using a Lew Rockwell as source... That is accurate information..
yea, it was an admittedly unfair comparison; I still couldn’t resit making it tho :)
“Because earmarks are funded from spending levels that have been determined before a single earmark is agreed to, with or without earmarks the spending levels remain the same.”
BS! The maximum spending levels are determined by the Authorization Committees. Actual spending levels are determined by the Authorization Committees who take the spending requested by the Federal Agencies and add the spending requested by members of Congress (earmarks). Eliminate the earmarks and you reduce actual spending.
“Now, will you explain why you believe that Congress should just appropriate our money and hand it over to unelected bureaucrats who cannot be fired without directing how it should be spent?”
Perhaps you might wish to explain why you believe members of Congress should just appropriate our money to bribe voters to vote for them or others to donate campaign funds to them which is eactly what an earmark is?
heh heh... well, freedom is exciting! :)
Glad to see the positive local news coverage there.
nice KC banner too.
Success in L.A.Los Angeles enthusiastically received Ron Paul yesterday!
The fundraising reception in the morning was a great success. It was held at the Ritz Carlton in Pasadena and tickets were $500 per person. Sold out!
After the breakfast, Dr. Paul went to the University of Southern California. He met with a group of students and press. He then spoke at a rally outside on campus. A police officer estimated the crowd to be between 700-900 people. They cheered Dr. Paul time and time again. Students and professors in the surrounding buildings had windows opened and listened too.
After the rally, Dr. Paul attended a fundraising reception on campus. Tickets were $500 per person for the event. Sold out!
Yesterday evening, Dr. Paul attended a fundraising dinner at the home of Bill Johnson. Tickets were $2,000 per person. Sold out!
Dr. Paul and staff then traveled to San Francisco arriving about 1:00 am this morning. It will be another busy day.
Kent Snyder
Chairman, Ron Paul 2008
I saw this thread and immediately thought about you.
This is great. No other candidate can generate such sincere enthusiasm. If the GOP hopes to beat Hillary, Ron is the best hope to pull it off.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!
Aw, Captain, I’m just glad to see you back among the land of the living! I searched for you for days and thought we’d lost you. Hopefully, we’ll see a few others resurrected as well.
Did that pass and I missed a memo?
When I said he has accomplished nothing what I meant is that HE HAS ACCOMPLISHED NOTHING.
I’m thinking that same posters posted this one. Why?
"I’ve told them a hundred times: put ‘Spinal Tap’ first and ‘Puppet Show’ last."
You know these polls are garbage just like the polls that show Rudy is leading the other GOP candidates.
You don't know jack, Johnnie-boy. You're just a stooge. All you do is repeat the same talking points faxed over to you from the RNC.
Probably Thompson, but a lot of Paul supporters won't support the GOP nominee. If it's Thompson, he'll win because Thompson is a federalist and his views are consistent with Paul's principles except for foreign policy, so he's the only Republican candidate who'll benefit the most from Paul supporters.
If the GOP establishment keeps treating Paul like dirt, a lot of his supporters are going to stay home or write in Paul's name in the general, and if the nominee's not Thompson, the Republican will easily lose to Hillary.
well, I think talking about freedom and introducing bills expanding freedom is a useful endevour. I have the hope that many of Paul’s bills will be passed someday, even if he is not the author when they do.
And I am suppose to be impressed that 1000 lunatics turned up for Paul?
OMG! Al-Qaida is in the front row! < /Paul bashers >
Probably none, since Paul supporters are capable of getting their own means of transportation and don't rely on campaign welfare like Romney & the other candidates do.
And how many are lib Rats trying to help Paul from the left?
Why would liberals help Paul when he's virtually the only Republican who can pull in a coalition of voters & destroy the Rat nominee in the general?
That doesn't explain why the candidates are paying attention to Utah lately. Maybe because the state is a bellwether of conservatism? You really don't get it.
And I am suppose to be impressed that 1000 lunatics turned up for Paul?
A thousand people Johnnie went out of their way to attend a rally for a candidate who's supposedly has no chance of winning or is supposedly at 2% in the polls. 1,000 folks is a very large number. You don't know who the Hell these people are Johnnie. Why don't you step out of your FR cocoon and take a good look at reality, and understand why people from all walks of life are supporting Dr. Paul.
Look at all them terrorists in the crowd! And Code Pinkos! And 9/11 Truthers! Look to the right - it’s Cindy Sheehan!
He would need support for that to happen, and after ten terms in Congress he has absolutely none.
He is all lip service, but you like the talk not the walk obviously so Godspeed.
Lew Rockwell owns the site, but the author of the article was Ron Paul, and the question (repeatedly) asked was for Ron Paul’s explanation of his position on earmarks.
Is there something wrong with linking to an article BY Ron Paul when asked for his opinion on the subject?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.