Skip to comments.
Hunter UAV kills two enemy fighters during historic flight [Bip!]
Multi-National Corps – Iraq ^
| 9/8/2007
| Public Affairs Office
Posted on 09/08/2007 3:03:06 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
RELEASE No. 20070908-01
September 8, 2007
Hunter UAV kills two enemy fighters during historic flight
Multi-National Division North PAO
TIKRIT, Iraq A Hunter unmanned aerial vehicle engaged and killed two suspected improvised explosive device emplacers overwatching a major thoroughfare for Coalition Forces during a historic flight near Qayyarah, Iraq, in Nineveh province Sept. 1.
A scout weapons team from 2nd Battalion, 25th Aviation Regiment, 25th Combat Aviation Brigade, observed the two unknown enemy fighters in a tactical overwatch near the roadside. The SWT requested support from the Hunter UAV.
The pilots guided the Hunter operator to the scene where it set up for a strike mission and dropped its precision munition, killing both unknown enemies and marking a first in Army Aviation history.
Its very humbling to know that we have set an Army historical mark in having the first successful launch in combat from an Army weaponized UAV, said Capt. Raymond Fields, commander, Unmanned Aerial Surveillance Company. This would not be possible without my Soldiers and civilians working hard day in and day out in Iraq to accomplish this feat.
Fields continued, I think that this success will set the tone for Army Aviation in years to come. We will see more weaponized Army unmanned vehicles being used instead of manned platforms to save not only our aviator brethren but our Army ground brethren from enemy contact.
This accomplishment adds a precise and discriminate means for our Army to successfully engage the enemy in counterinsurgency warfare, said Col. A.T. Ball, commander, 25th CAB.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: efp; frwn; iraq; miltech; uav; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-63 next last
Bip!
To: Tennessean4Bush
To: Tennessean4Bush

Future fighter pilots of America?
3
posted on
09/08/2007 3:06:05 AM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
To: Tennessean4Bush
They need to pay for advertising this complete with video and play it 1000 times a week on Iraqi media. The bad guys will think twice about planting these bombs if the eye in the sky is watching.
4
posted on
09/08/2007 3:06:38 AM PDT
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Tennessean4Bush
5
posted on
09/08/2007 3:06:42 AM PDT
by
ARE SOLE
(Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
To: Tennessean4Bush
Big metal bird drop poop go BANG! send to 72 virgins with not all parts intact! =(
6
posted on
09/08/2007 3:08:47 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Weekend starts at 8:30 AM Saturday...)
To: jveritas
Ping-a-ling.
Noticed on another thread you said that some of the jihadi websites you monitor are indicating that the terrorists are pooling near Mosul. Maybe the Hunter UAV needs to deploy there, eh?
7
posted on
09/08/2007 3:15:07 AM PDT
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Tennessean4Bush
I’ll bet the bad guys are now really worried about doing their little “night jobs” on the roads there.
8
posted on
09/08/2007 3:17:29 AM PDT
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: Tennessean4Bush; 1stbn27; 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; ...
9
posted on
09/08/2007 3:20:10 AM PDT
by
freema
(Thank you, Red!)
To: ARE SOLE

Check underneath the wings...
10
posted on
09/08/2007 3:34:46 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: ovrtaxt
What’s with open mouths and computer games...all gamers do it!
To: ovrtaxt
The Last Starfighter is no longer fiction.
12
posted on
09/08/2007 4:18:32 AM PDT
by
Solitar
("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
To: Tennessean4Bush
Good job, but...no “friendly” fire killings.
13
posted on
09/08/2007 4:25:49 AM PDT
by
hermgem
(Will Olmr)
To: Tennessean4Bush
14
posted on
09/08/2007 4:38:32 AM PDT
by
Clioman
To: Dave Elias
Tell osama to say AHHHHH.
15
posted on
09/08/2007 4:56:00 AM PDT
by
tdscpa
To: Tennessean4Bush
I think that this success will set the tone for Army Aviation in years to comeMeanwhile, back at the Pentagon, I'm sure the Air Force has a team busy preparing presentations to Congress to take this fixed-wing weapon away from the Army and give it to them.
To: Tennessean4Bush; 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!
All the News the MSM refuses to use!
Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!
Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
17
posted on
09/08/2007 5:43:49 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: ARE SOLE

looks like a redesigned O2/SkyMaster-UAV
18
posted on
09/08/2007 5:48:18 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: Chode
looks like a redesigned O2/SkyMaster-UAVYeah it does. A push me / pull you.
Regards
19
posted on
09/08/2007 5:59:49 AM PDT
by
ARE SOLE
(Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
To: Tennessean4Bush

Something I heard about back in February.
To: Tennessean4Bush
The pay scale for IED installers just went up.
21
posted on
09/08/2007 6:22:50 AM PDT
by
Ben Chad
To: Eye of Unk
Very nice... A heavily armed UAV. It is the wave of the future. Eventually, robots will be fighting in the streets below, too.
22
posted on
09/08/2007 6:26:41 AM PDT
by
tlj18
(Keep your eye on China....)
To: Tennessean4Bush
They were just misguided teenagers having a little mischievous fun. Perhaps, if we could have just gotten them into counseling or an after-school program at the Boys and Girls Club, they wouldn’t have died senselessly. /Ron Paul
23
posted on
09/08/2007 6:29:03 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(How hot does it have to get for a burning concrete lion to experience spalling? Anybody know?)
To: Tennessean4Bush
"fighters"???? "improvised explosive device emplacers"??????
how 'bout "terrorists"??? "murderers"??? animals? cowards?
why must the media come up with such pretty names for these dirtbags?
sooner or later, they'll be calling them "activists"
24
posted on
09/08/2007 6:30:56 AM PDT
by
wny
To: wny
Hell, my first impression was that the UAV had downed 2 enemy
planes. lol
"fighters"????
25
posted on
09/08/2007 6:43:14 AM PDT
by
Ready4Freddy
("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
To: Tennessean4Bush
26
posted on
09/08/2007 7:04:45 AM PDT
by
RDTF
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but Democrats believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: wny
Unfortunately, this isn’t the media, this is our armed forces reporting that way........
27
posted on
09/08/2007 7:21:51 AM PDT
by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: wny
I have no idea why the drive-bys want to call them IED’s. It may help EOD to know whether it’s a factory fabricated mine or a homemade job, but it makes no difference to the voter and most military whether its cell phone activated, time activated or remote activated, or switch actuated. A mine is planted, and that saves a lot of time and paper in the headlines. These asinine government acronyms have gotten way out of hand.
To: Eye of Unk
That is way cool!
30
posted on
09/08/2007 7:37:55 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
To: wny
Absolutely dead on target! Slimeball media pukes and their fawning euphemisms make me sick.
But they did manage to add the one descriptor that covers a multitude of sins: DEAD.
When it comes to jihadis, that's the best possible way to describe them.
31
posted on
09/08/2007 7:43:23 AM PDT
by
MarineDad
(Whenever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits.)
To: endthematrix
Jihadi suppositories!
New, improved packaging, and a wonderfully effective delivery method.
Ya gotta love it!
32
posted on
09/08/2007 7:45:40 AM PDT
by
MarineDad
(Whenever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits.)
To: Ready4Freddy
Hell, my first impression was that the UAV had downed 2 enemy planes. lol "fighters"????"bombers" would have been more accurate...
33
posted on
09/08/2007 7:47:32 AM PDT
by
FDNYRHEROES
(Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
To: 19th LA Inf
Meanwhile, back at the Pentagon, I'm sure the Air Force has a team busy preparing presentations to Congress to take this fixed-wing weapon away from the Army and give it to them.= "Resource Reallocation by PowerPoint"
34
posted on
09/08/2007 7:53:39 AM PDT
by
FDNYRHEROES
(Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
To: Tennessean4Bush
This is the death knell of the Army's use of UCAVs. The fact that they successfully took out Jihadis using their OWN (as in, Army resourced, operated and controlled) UCAV must be ringing across the halls of Airforce HQ. Already the USAF has been saying that UCAVs should be under the control of the airforce, and this will simply make those cries louder. And then there is the whole fixed-wing aircraft ....I'm sure some brainbox is working on some argument that since UCAVs (like the one used here) are fixed-wing they should be under the airforce. Now, there are some rotor-wing UCAVs, but they have no useful load-carrying capacity (i.e. weapons) and are thus simply eyes-in-the-sky, and ofcourse the Marines and Navy would be alright (although recently the USAF has been gunning after the Navy's UCAV program ....the stealthy UCAV version the Navy has been pushing ....thus maybe even the Navy is not totally safe).
Anyways, good work by the Army. And they better make sure that their programs are not snatched from them.
Don't get me wrong flyboys ....the airforce does a GREAT job. However some of the bigshots on the USAF are too stingy with flying assets. For instance the A-10 (which has apparently been given a life extension with the 'C' upgrades) has faced the executioner several times, even though the Army would have been more than willing to take it. The only thing that kept saving the A-10 is that what it does cannot be as easily taken over by (say) F-16s and F-35s. In a war against a serious foe (e.g. say China, and we really haven't faced a 'serious' foe in quite some time) A-10s woudln't have a high survivability, but against 'typical' foes like Afhganistan and Iraq there is nothing that comes close to an A-10 in combat support, and a Warthog flying overhead is a welcome sight to any Marine or Army grunt (and the bane of any Jehadi). However the airforce keeps pushign for sexy high-performance air-Ferraris, thus sooner or later the A-10 (even the C version) will finally be laid to rest.
Anyways, good for the Army. However I hope they get to keep their UCAVs, because it is very easy for the USAF to lay claim to control of un-manned combat aerial vehicles that are fixed wing ....and for now and the coming future most useful UCAVs will be fixed wing.
35
posted on
09/08/2007 7:59:26 AM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: 19th LA Inf
Absolutely. The USAF cannot tolerate Army E4 and E5s doing the work that could just as easily be done by Lts. Capts. and Majors that could not make it through flight school.
36
posted on
09/08/2007 8:06:52 AM PDT
by
BTCM
(Death and destruction is the only treaty Muslims comprehend.)
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Travis McGee; Jeff Head; Seadog Bytes; gonzo
37
posted on
09/08/2007 9:04:13 AM PDT
by
devolve
To: freema
Two more dirt balls hit the dust.
38
posted on
09/08/2007 9:10:22 AM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Hunter in 2008)
To: Tennessean4Bush
39
posted on
09/08/2007 9:50:37 AM PDT
by
aculeus
To: devolve
40
posted on
09/08/2007 6:31:39 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: Tennessean4Bush
Anyone know just what sort of “precision munition” they use?
41
posted on
09/08/2007 7:33:48 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: potlatch
42
posted on
09/08/2007 7:39:17 PM PDT
by
devolve
To: spetznaz
In a war against a serious foe (e.g. say China, and we really haven't faced a 'serious' foe in quite some time) A-10s woudln't have a high survivability, Better than you might think. They are tough birds. Saddam has a serious military, especially before Gulf War I. The A-10s ate their lunch, with low losses. The Air Force guys liked to call it "Plinking Tanks", but that tends to grate on the Armor types.
43
posted on
09/08/2007 7:40:09 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: devolve
Linus wouldn’t be shivering if he had been at Padre! HOT, HOT, HOT!!
44
posted on
09/08/2007 8:05:15 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: Tennessean4Bush
I wish they would relase the d*mn tape along with these stories. I love watching jihadis die.
To: El Gato
46
posted on
09/08/2007 8:19:18 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: potlatch
47
posted on
09/08/2007 8:34:01 PM PDT
by
devolve
To: devolve
Ahh, that is pretty devolve! You are getting snazzy with your posts! I could pinpoint both condo’s I’ve stayed in there. Padre is not as ‘huge’ as you might think!
48
posted on
09/08/2007 8:38:26 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: potlatch
.
If you add a 20-30 pixel or more border before that is done you get more of the original photograph
I’ve been dinking away adding new stuff
49
posted on
09/08/2007 8:45:08 PM PDT
by
devolve
To: devolve
I just saved it. Looked at ‘properties’ and saw the size. I’m amazed at how much you were able to enlarge it!
You do good ‘dinking’!
Ahh, the water looked much more blue-green on the sunny days. Was overcast the first two.
50
posted on
09/08/2007 8:50:01 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson