Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UFW tries to end secret ballots in union elections
Sacramento Bee ^ | 9/6/7 | Daniel Weintraub

Posted on 09/06/2007 10:37:03 AM PDT by SmithL

Thirty years ago, legendary union organizer Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers made history by winning the right to a secret ballot for migrant field hands in California who wanted to join a union. Today, in an odd twist, the UFW is trying to take that right away.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is weighing legislation sent to his desk last week that would allow unions to organize farm workers by collecting signed cards from a majority of those workers rather than conducting an election at which each employee makes a confidential choice in the privacy of a voting booth.

The UFW says Senate Bill 180 is necessary to protect farm workers from intimidation by employers who oppose unions. But it is difficult to see how removing the right to a secret ballot in an election conducted by the state -- the current arrangement -- would help workers in any way.

Instead, the legislation's goal appears to be to help the union expand its membership by eliminating the need for elections. Workers would have to look a union member in the eye and tell him No if they preferred not to join.

The legislation comes at a time when the UFW has been struggling to maintain its footing on the farm. The union won just half of the elections it contested between 1990 and 2005, according to Rural Migration News, a publication by the University of California, Davis.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: ufw; unionthugs
How un-American.
1 posted on 09/06/2007 10:37:05 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Today the Left is against the secret ballot.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 09/06/2007 10:38:17 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I could never be a union member. NEVER

I’d live off alpo before I’d join.


3 posted on 09/06/2007 10:40:45 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Workers would have to look a union member Thug in the eye and tell him No if they preferred not to join.

Gutsy, but not a wise move.


4 posted on 09/06/2007 10:40:50 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If Arnold signs that bill, he is either stupid or now officially a democrat. Secret ballots prevent all intimidation because nobody knows how someone voted. Union cards are just a way for unions to intimidate people to join a union.
5 posted on 09/06/2007 10:40:56 AM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Isn’t this exactly what the Employee Free Choice Act is?


6 posted on 09/06/2007 10:41:58 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Its Orwellian. I do think we need strong private sector labor unions but no one should be forced to join one.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 09/06/2007 10:43:10 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Isn’t this exactly what the Employee Free Choice Act is?

Sure is.

L

8 posted on 09/06/2007 10:43:38 AM PDT by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The UFW says Senate Bill 180 is necessary to protect farm workers from intimidation by employers who oppose unions.

It is of course the opposite. The objective is to promote unionism over and above objections from others.

9 posted on 09/06/2007 10:47:38 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Egad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"...but no one should be forced to join one."

It a condition of employment for me, since my state does not have the Employee's Free Choice Act.
10 posted on 09/06/2007 10:54:11 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Pardon me: My State does not have the “Right to Work Act”, I got my bills confused.


11 posted on 09/06/2007 10:55:10 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The fix is almost in.


12 posted on 09/06/2007 10:57:37 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
That's the problem with compulsory unionism. If unions really represent the interest of workers, the principle of joining them should appeal to working stiffs. The problem is unions have failed to articulate reasons why workers should vote for them and rather than fixing the problem they want government to force workers to join them through union-rigged elections.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

13 posted on 09/06/2007 11:01:44 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Another test for Arnold. If he signs this bill. he is officially a Democrat.


14 posted on 09/06/2007 11:18:44 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The UFW says Senate Bill 180 is necessary to protect farm workers from intimidation by employers who oppose unions.

Some lies are 100% transparent.

15 posted on 09/06/2007 12:54:42 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
To win broader support for the bill in the Legislature, the UFW accepted an amendment that would require both the worker and the card circulator to sign under penalty of perjury that the worker signed the card without coercion. A similar provision applies to state voter registration cards and initiative petitions.

Under penalty of perjury. Yep, that'll stop the intimidation all right! "Hey you slashing my tires! That's coercion!"

16 posted on 09/06/2007 12:55:28 PM PDT by scan59 (Let consumers dictate market policies. Government just gets in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson