Posted on 09/05/2007 7:08:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Even though the year is far from over and is likely to have its fair share of hypocrisy, Mrs. Clinton’s comment on the need to compromise to achieve political and social progress has to outclass any other current or future entrant for the Hypocrite of the Year award.
This woman, who refused to change a comma or a word of her thousand-page-plus healthcare reform bill and, as a result of her intractable stubbornness, sent the bill down to defeat along with the Democratic Congress and almost her husband’s presidency, is daring to show herself now as the apostle of compromise.
Unbelievable.
Here’s what she recently said:
“Ultimately, to bring change, you have to know when to stand your ground, and when to find common ground. You need to know when to stick to principles and fight, and know when to make principled compromises. You can’t always demand everything your own way, or you’ll never get anything done.”
For Hillary to give a sermon on compromise in politics is a bit like the Ayatollah preaching religious tolerance. This is the same woman who:
Refused to release the Whitewater documents, triggering the appointment of a special prosecutor;
Wouldn’t settle the Paula Jones suit — with no apology, admission, or damages required — out of simple stubbornness;
Insisted on the secrecy of her healthcare reform task force’s deliberations until a federal court ruled her position invalid and who still won’t release her first lady healthcare reform documents until after the election;
Insisted on the travel office firings even when they became a total political embarrassment;
Will still not apologize for her vote for the Iraq war.
And, in the Senate, where she pretends to have developed her penchant for compromise, she still has not succeeded in passing a single major piece of legislation.
Compromise was not, to put it mildly, uppermost in her thinking in 1993 and 1994. After it was clear that her healthcare package was doomed to defeat, I suggested that she adopt a fallback position and support the bill first introduced by Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kan. The Dole bill provided for portability of healthcare benefits as workers migrated from job to job. Dole had filed it in the heady days of 1993, when healthcare reform was still popular. Needing a Republican alternative to Hillary’s program, he proposed this important reform.
Knowing that Dole would have to let it pass because it was his bill, I urged Hillary to push the Dole bill, arguing that she could take the achievement to the nation in 1996 as evidence of progress on healthcare.
She rejected the idea out of hand, as she did all healthcare compromises, insisting that “unless we fix the whole system, we’ll just make things worse.” She said that “if we tinker with this change or that change, it will be like squeezing a balloon. One end will be smaller but the other will just get larger.” She worried that insurance companies would raise their rates if the bill passed.
Now she is the bearer of the torch of compromise. If we could believe her conversion was sincere, it would make her less dangerous as a possible president. But it clearly is not. Her newfound desire for compromise is driven by her need to appeal simultaneously to the Democratic base and general electorate. She has to explain to the partisans of the left why she must adopt positions tailored to win the November election on the Iraq war and other issues.
Her advocacy of compromise is just one part of her Labor Day repositioning. She has also changed her campaign slogan from “Experience” to “Change + Experience,” because she feels uncomfortable ceding the ground of change in a Democratic primary to Obama. Of course, the only change that her candidacy seems to offer is a different first name in the perennial Bush/Clinton dichotomy that has gripped the nation for the past 20 years.
In reality, Hillary’s focus on compromise and the need for change takes place against the backdrop of an increasingly successful war in Iraq. With Bush now admitting that some troop withdrawals will be necessary and the Democrats conceding that all the troops cannot be withdrawn, Hillary and the Democratic candidates face the prospect of losing their best issue — the failed war.
So, if your position is increasingly untenable, prepare your voters for compromise.
“With Bush now admitting that some troop withdrawals will be necessary ....”
He did no such thing — he’s saying that troop withdrawals will be possible as the situation in Iraq continues to improve.
"Concerns" is understatement. It bugs me to no end.
I like Fred. What coverage does Fred get? Virtually nothing.
The spin machine is running at full tilt - 14 months out.
This really concerns me.
Who gets their news (and views) from the msm? Unfortunately, a lot of hapless voters still do.
That concerns me.
Toe-Sucker Speaks.
OMG! This sounds just like President Jorge, I mean Bush, on immigration! Who would have thought he and she have so much in common!
We know she’s a hypocrit, but get used to eight years of it as President starting in ‘09....
Odd number day = lil dick attacks the beast. Even number days he predicts she will be the next POTUS. This was obviously an odd day piece, but please don’t tell anyone about this formula. He is so cute when he does his schtick on Hannity’s show.
That’s all you need to know about Hillary.
I think Morris is working for Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.