Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panama Canal begins historic expansion (start of construction on two wider sets of locks both ends)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 9/3/07 | Kathia Martinez - ap

Posted on 09/03/2007 4:06:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

PANAMA CITY, Panama - Panama blasted away part of a hillside next to the canal on Monday, marking the start of the waterway's biggest expansion since it opened 93 years ago.

In the presence of former President Carter, who signed the 1977 treaty that gave Panama control of the waterway, Panamanian President Martin Torrijos celebrated the start of construction on two wider sets of locks being added to both sides of the canal.

"We are witnesses to an exceptional and unique act," Torrijos said moments after the explosion sent up a curtain of smoke and water.

The $5.25 billion expansion is expected to double the 50-mile canal's capacity and lower the price of consumer goods on the East Coast of the United States by allowing wider vessels to squeeze through with more cargo.

About two-thirds of the cargo that passed through the canal is headed to or from the United States. China is the Panama Canal's second-largest user.

The waterway now moves 4 percent of the world's cargo. The new locks, approved in a referendum nearly a year ago, are expected to be ready for use between 2014 and 2015.

The Panama Canal Authority, the autonomous government agency that runs the canal, is borrowing up to $2.3 billion between 2009 and 2011 to help finance the project. It expects to pay that back by increasing ship tolls an average of 3.5 percent a year.

In addition to benefiting international trade, the new locks are expected to generate more revenue for the canal and Panama's government, which is struggling to pay back more than $10 billion in debt and battle poverty that affects some 40 percent of the population.

"I'm proud of the grand plans for this expansion," said Carter, who signed the 1977 treaty with Torrijos' father, strongman Omar Torrijos, that led to the U.S. handover of the canal to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999.

Under Panama's control, canal accidents and the time needed to transverse the canal are down, while revenues have increased.

President Theodore Roosevelt arranged for Panama's independence from Colombia in 1903 to build the canal. By some accounts, more than 25,000 people died during American and French efforts to build the engineering marvel, which opened on Aug. 15, 1914.

Also attending Monday's ceremony were Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and several Central American leaders and Colombian President Alvaro Uribe.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: expansion; historic; maritime; panama; panamacanal

Panamanians attend a ceremony marking the beginning of the expansion of the Panama Canal project in Paraiso on the outskirts Panama City, Monday, Sept. 3, 2007. (AP Photo/Arnulfo Franco)


1 posted on 09/03/2007 4:06:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hey Norm!

Hot enough for ya?


2 posted on 09/03/2007 4:08:09 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
It's in the low 80s and breezy ,, I'll take it.

Ya ever go thru the Canal..? we're headed thru next April.

.

A controlled explosion marks the beginning of the expansion of the Panama Canal project
in Paraiso on the outskirts Panama City, Monday, Sept. 3, 2007. (AP Photo/Arnulfo Franco)

3 posted on 09/03/2007 4:11:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Panama's President Martin Torrijos, second left, and Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter wave during the Panama Canal expansion project's inauguration ceremony in Paraiso, on the outskirts of Panama City, Monday, Sept. 3, 2007. Panama blasted away part of a hillside next to the canal Monday, marking the start of the waterway's biggest expansion project since it opened, 93 years ago. (AP Photo/Arnulfo Franco)


Left to right: Panama's President Martin Torrijos, former US President Jimmy Carter, OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza and Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega attend the Panama Canal expansion project's inauguration ceremony in Paraiso, on the outskirts of Panama City, Monday, Sept. 3, 2007. Panama blasted away part of a hillside next to the canal Monday, marking the start of the waterway's biggest expansion project since it opened, 93 years ago. (AP Photo/Arnulfo Franco)


4 posted on 09/03/2007 4:13:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wearing duct tape to muffle my fingers!


5 posted on 09/03/2007 4:14:52 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank

The big “give away”


6 posted on 09/03/2007 4:15:58 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Carter is so proud of himself for failing to negotiate an extended lease for the canal. He was an idiot stick when he became president and went down hill from there.

He singlehandedly destabalized the Middle-East for over thirty years and has set back our dealings with North Korea for over ten.

This nation will be much safer when he has left the building figuratively.


7 posted on 09/03/2007 4:16:39 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Really cool pics! I’d love to go there.

95 here again, for the 4th day in a row. And now they’re saying we’re having a “heat wave” here next week. I hate to think what that might mean.

Hot hot hot.


8 posted on 09/03/2007 4:17:53 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I was hoping to see the sea level canal in Nicaragua. Plowshare, yes.


9 posted on 09/03/2007 4:18:08 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

I will be taking pics when we go thru for sure,, maybe I should do a Canal thread?

Naaaaaw. Too much work. altho I think we get free internet on the ship, being frequent cruiser and all., yaknow. :)

We really cooled off here, just keep the bucket and shovel handy..


10 posted on 09/03/2007 4:20:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I read that the Soo Locks were going to get a makeover also. Guess it shows that the Shipping industry is changing and adapting.
11 posted on 09/03/2007 4:23:47 PM PDT by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I don’t know.

NICARAGUA: Plan for Inter-Ocean Canal Reborn
http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=20122

Lidia Hunter

MANAGUA, Sep 13 (Tierramérica) - Nicaragua is once again dreaming of building an inter-ocean route — one that would make the Panama Canal look tiny. But the mega-project, which would take 10 years to complete and would cost more than 25 times the national budget, could be catastrophic for the environment, say ecologists.

There are four projects under consideration for connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans via different routes across Nicaragua. The goal is to be able to transport volumes of cargo that the Panama Canal cannot handle.

To date, only the government has proposed a water-only route. If approved, the canal must guarantee ”absolute control over sovereignty and ecology,” Arturo Harding, Nicaragua’s environment minister, told Tierramérica.

Harding is a member of a governmental commission that is drawing up a preliminary study to determine whether canal construction would be feasible.

Jorge Huezo, also on the commission, told Tierramérica that the studies should be ready by the end of the year, and then a legislative bill would be sent to congress ”in order to give the country a legal framework for negotiating mega-projects, particularly the canal.”

The route ”would be much bigger than the Panama Canal — if it is built,” said Harding.


12 posted on 09/03/2007 4:26:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Went through several times in ‘96 with Vincennes on counter narcotic ops. Conned the ship on a night transit. Pretty cool. Little known fact that the canal runs basically north/south and the Pacific side is further east than the Atlantic side.


13 posted on 09/03/2007 4:27:43 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Some kind of lock system would have to be built in Nicaragua even if it is a sea level all water route. Can you imagine the tidal effect? Besides that, somebody said sea level is different between the Caribbean and the Pacific and it would probably do some bad things to open that up.


14 posted on 09/03/2007 4:32:04 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Thanks for that, I need to post a map for reference.

Here’s a link for web cams including the expansion area.
http://www.pancanal.com/eng/photo/camera-java.html

Hit this one to go to the Panama Canal start page
http://www.pancanal.com/


15 posted on 09/03/2007 4:32:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Carter is so proud of himself for failing to negotiate an extended lease for the canal.”

The US had decades to renegotiate whatever base leases they wanted, particularly Howard AFB and Fort Sherman, and did neither, though apparently the negotiations for use of Howard were sandbagged by the Panama side.


16 posted on 09/03/2007 4:33:44 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

It’s a pretty grand project, could have lots of side effects.


17 posted on 09/03/2007 4:33:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

‘attending Monday’s ceremony were Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.’

I thought this alzheimers/parkinson senator was dead. Must’ve had a drool bowl and catherized for the trip.


18 posted on 09/03/2007 4:34:01 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

As I recall, the Atlantic side is 19 (?) feet higher than the Pacific side. I don’t know why but it’s the reason for the locks.


19 posted on 09/03/2007 4:34:18 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Interesting.


20 posted on 09/03/2007 4:35:15 PM PDT by Socratic (“Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength.” - Corrie Ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“This nation will be much safer when he has left the building figuratively.”

And there is no guarantee that Jimmy’s brand of “Baptist” assures him a place in heaven. He better be wearing asbestos long-jimmy’s when he passes from this scene...


21 posted on 09/03/2007 4:35:20 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neodad

19 feet is a lot. The Panama Canal gets some elevation in addition to that and isn’t at sea level all the way, either Atlantic or Pacific.


22 posted on 09/03/2007 4:36:01 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It should be built. Also, the Bering Strait Bridge/Tunnel for rail and pipeline.


23 posted on 09/03/2007 4:37:33 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

My bad, it’s 20 cm. differnce on the Atlantic to the Pacific. I remembered after reading is that the locks are there to raise and lower the ships to the level of Gatun lake in the middle. The water from the lake and the runoff from the rain forrests is how water is transferred in the locks. Its basically downhill in both directions.


24 posted on 09/03/2007 4:37:52 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Bering Strait Bridge/Tunnel for rail and pipeline.

That would be quite the undertaking..


25 posted on 09/03/2007 4:40:59 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Well, that’s a foot, and probably an average not taking tides into account. The tide pouring through the Nicaragua canal might be an awesome thing if they don’t block it, not to mention the foot that would try to come to a level.


26 posted on 09/03/2007 4:40:59 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We’re up to the task. Just say when.


27 posted on 09/03/2007 4:42:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Bering Strait Bridge/Tunnel for rail and pipeline

I'd think crossing the strait would be the cheap part. You have to run a lot of track and pipe to connect the two land terminals to anything else and maintenance costs to keep the rail line open would be high. The current Alaska pipeline shows that the pipeline could be kept going overland, but is there any current rail in in Alaska, Canada, Russia or Scandinavia that would be comparable?

28 posted on 09/03/2007 4:51:37 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Didn’t the lease end in 1999? I don’t remember right now. It seems there was a lot more involved in this than just Carter being another person on a list with the ability to renegotiate.


29 posted on 09/03/2007 4:56:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

That crossed my mind as I was entering the post. Only God knows a man’s heart, but it doesn’t look good from my vantage point.


30 posted on 09/03/2007 4:57:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I’m a Balboa High School graduate, Class of ‘86.

Did the Corps of Engineers get the contract for the expansion?

Are they going to recycle the water or dump it into the ocean? I assume they will still use locks.


31 posted on 09/03/2007 5:00:48 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Doesn’t china have control over the Panama Canal now?


32 posted on 09/03/2007 5:03:00 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Jimmy’s Christian ethics are so strong that he gave Willie Jeff a pass on his Oval Office affairs with the lady in the blue dress.


33 posted on 09/03/2007 5:05:34 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

No, I don;t think so, they have control over the ports at both ends is more like it. Panama still calls the shots on the Canal.


34 posted on 09/03/2007 5:06:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

That was no lady


35 posted on 09/03/2007 5:07:15 PM PDT by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Carter was too envious to damn Clinton. For a guy who taught Sunday Schoo, he sure was morally adrift.


36 posted on 09/03/2007 5:12:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Carter was too envious to damn Clinton. For a guy who taught Sunday School, he sure was morally adrift.


37 posted on 09/03/2007 5:12:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: al baby

There were also no “Christian ethics” demonstrated during this man’s Presidency. And the brain of the family owned a gas station in Plains.


38 posted on 09/03/2007 5:13:21 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

With those lips, ya suppose he was an occasional visitor to the Oval Orifice during those years?


39 posted on 09/03/2007 5:16:23 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung

-Did the Corps of Engineers get the contract for the expansion? —

Not sure,, their web site is not up to date, talks about a bid process but not the winner.

-Are they going to recycle the water or dump it into the ocean? I assume they will still use locks. —

Good question on recycle or dump the water, haven’t seen the actual plans for the new locks, good idea long-term if they can implement it ..


40 posted on 09/03/2007 5:17:55 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

Like spending time in the Lincoln Bedroom. I don’t know. I don’t even want to think about it. LOL


41 posted on 09/03/2007 5:17:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: neodad
Little known fact that the canal runs basically north/south and the Pacific side is further east than the Atlantic side.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

42 posted on 09/03/2007 5:18:55 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
they have control over the ports at both ends is more like it.

That's where I was wrong then. I thought if they controlled both ends they controlled it all. My mistake. Thanks.

43 posted on 09/03/2007 5:21:05 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

It’s a screwy arrangement, I could be wrong. we should have never signed off on it..


44 posted on 09/03/2007 5:22:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It's screwy all right. china could bring in nukes, hide them, and here comes cuba all over again.

Dumb ass carter.

45 posted on 09/03/2007 5:24:44 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
President Theodore Roosevelt arranged for Panama’s independence from Colombia in 1903 to build the canal.

that is an interesting understatement if I remember my history correctly.
46 posted on 09/04/2007 6:09:49 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

give it a break, this has been going around for what will soon be a decade...do appreciate the pic links, though. What exactly is the Cristobal and Balboa port Hutchinson-Whampoa issue anyway? Have you been to either of these ports, talked to management and/or employees, etc?

Why is the former Rodman naval facility not included in your diagram? Its strategic significance is as great as that of Balboa’s...


47 posted on 09/06/2007 3:09:37 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Very interesting post. Thank you. : )


48 posted on 09/07/2007 6:34:20 PM PDT by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why don’t they just wait for global warming to submerge Central America?


49 posted on 09/07/2007 6:39:45 PM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson