Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warships from Canada, other countries, join U.S. navy in manoeuvres off Panama
AP via Sun Media ^ | 2007-09-02 | (wire service)

Posted on 09/02/2007 1:08:01 PM PDT by Clive

MIAMI (AP) - Warships from Canada and more than a dozen other countries joined the U.S. navy for ongoing manoeuvres Sunday near the Panama Canal in an exercise being billed as one of the largest multinational military training events of the year.

More than 30 ships began the exercises Wednesday in the waters near the canal, to practise defending the economically and strategically crucial waterway.

The exercise is scheduled to continue through Friday in the Caribbean and Pacific approaches to the canal.

Thousands of ships pass through the Panama Canal every year, shuttling more than 200 million tons of exports and imports that are vital to the region's economies, according to the Miami-based U.S. Southern Command, which is sponsoring the exercise.

A dozen Latin American and Caribbean countries were participating, as were Canada, France, the Netherlands and the United States.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: canada; canadiannavy; candada; france; jointexercises; maritime; netherlands; panama; panamacanal; usmilitary; usnavy

1 posted on 09/02/2007 1:08:05 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 09/02/2007 1:08:42 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Isn’t Noreiga getting released from his Miami prison this month?


3 posted on 09/02/2007 1:22:42 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Warships from Canada

Both of them?

And yes, I use both to mean 2. Last list I saw showed two destroyers in the Atlantic fleet. The Canadians also have one functioning submarine at the moment. Then there is the west coast destroyer, and a handful of frigates on each coast.

4 posted on 09/02/2007 1:47:04 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Have you seen any mooses eh?

;-)

5 posted on 09/02/2007 1:49:57 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
This is a yearly practice that has be going on for years and years. I went in 1972 and had a great time. The South Americans treated us great, especially Chileans. Training with SA is the purpose and goodwill.
6 posted on 09/02/2007 2:04:47 PM PDT by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
isn’t he on his way to France???
7 posted on 09/02/2007 4:44:34 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

The Caribbean side should be seeing some heavy seas pretty soon.


8 posted on 09/02/2007 4:46:49 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

You appear to have forgotten about the dozen Halifax frigates and the supply vessels, but that’s not surprising, as you appear capable only of denigration and belittlement of your one true friend on this earth.

Why do you insist on trying to besmirch the contribution of Canada to the security and freedom of our hemisphere?

Why do you constantly try to drive a wedge between our cultures?

As the Peace Arch so clearly announces to any who read it, we are “Children of a Common Mother”.

Or is it that you think that because your nation is larger, bullying is fair play?

It’s bad enough that we up here have to tolerate the morons on the left side of the political spectrum. Thoughtless posts like the one I am responding to make it that much more difficult to mend the fabric torn by years of leftism here AND THERE!

Up here we FINALLY have a genuinely close to conservative Federal gov’t. Major changes have already occurred, and more are on the way. New planes, helos, tanks, and this in the FIRST year!

Let’s try to work together for the furthering of conservative values rather than SNIPING at admitted weaknesses and shortcomings of each other, OK?


9 posted on 09/02/2007 9:36:29 PM PDT by Don W (I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; exg; kanawa; conniew; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; ...

10 posted on 09/03/2007 5:39:32 AM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Have you seen any mooses eh?

A møøse once bit my sister.

11 posted on 09/03/2007 6:05:31 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Don, he was just trying to wind us up, it appears to have worked on you. You can’t deny our Navy is in a pitiful state today compared to what it once was. It hurts me painfully, but we will have our pride restored one day.


12 posted on 09/04/2007 8:29:15 AM PDT by Catholic Canadian ( I love Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clive
"The Cuban Navy will hunt down the Imperialist Satan Dogs and deliver a Crushing blow!"


13 posted on 09/04/2007 8:34:48 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

you ass


14 posted on 09/07/2007 1:11:39 AM PDT by albertabound (Its good to beeee Alberta Bound ( Go Flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

I see they don’t teach manners in Canada any more. Or reading comprehension either, for that matter, What part of “NO personal attacks” can you not understand?

And, of course, you weren’t able to post anything to refute my post. How many functioning submarines do you think Canada has? How many Functioning destroyers do you think Canada has on the east coast? on the west coast?

Buying the used British submarines rather than new German, Swedish, or French boats was a horrible idea, and your name calling won’t make it any better.


15 posted on 09/07/2007 7:39:37 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Catholic Canadian; Don W
It hurts me painfully, but we will have our pride restored one day.

Sooner I hope, rather than later, but modern warships aren't built overnight.

16 posted on 09/07/2007 7:42:45 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Catholic Canadian; Don W
Don, he was just trying to wind us up, it appears to have worked on you. You can’t deny our Navy is in a pitiful state today compared to what it once was. It hurts me painfully, but we will have our pride restored one day.

Personally I think we'd all do better as one nation. (Minus Quebec and without all the socialism of course)

17 posted on 09/07/2007 7:51:04 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
I didn't think Canada had a real Navy. I was surprised to see the headline, "Warships from Canada." It is a sacrifice, when you think about it. They are probably putting all their assets into this maneuver. :0
18 posted on 09/07/2007 8:00:05 AM PDT by suzyjaruki (Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Pop another Moosehead and chill, eh.


19 posted on 09/07/2007 8:02:48 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: suzyjaruki

While the info I gave was dated (except as to the subs) I believe it was generally accurate. That’s probably why the Canadian guy was so upset - he couldn’t refute it. Well that, and perhaps some alcohol.


20 posted on 09/07/2007 8:03:19 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/americas/canada.htm

At the end of WWII, Canada’s navy was third largest on the planet.

Now while it is a pale ghost of its former self, it is still staffed by extremely well trained and skilled fighters who are quite often key players in US aircraft carrier operations as screening and anti-air platforms.

Ask any US sailor who has deployed with Cdn warriors how our personnel and abilities stack up.

Or would you rather dig yourself deeper?


21 posted on 09/07/2007 9:38:24 AM PDT by Don W (I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Don W; All
Holy cow! Your navy is worse off than I had thought. No new ships since 1999!?!?!? Front line destroyers all of 1970s vintage?!?!?!

There, but for the Grace of God ...

That's exactly what Hillary Obama Edwards would like to do the the United States Navy.

22 posted on 09/07/2007 9:44:14 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Don W
At the end of WWII, Canada’s navy was third largest on the planet.

And now it is a small coastal defense force.

it is still staffed by extremely well trained and skilled fighters

And where did I suggest that the sailors weren't well qualified. Since you can't address me on the merits, you have to make up things to argue against.

Or would you rather dig yourself deeper?

You are the one that seems to be shoveling something. If you have any facts to refute my points, produce them. On the other hand, if you are trying to suggest that Canada's navy is adequate to defend its own shorelines, much less project, I'll laugh at you.

Canada probably ranks slightly behind the Netherlands in naval strength, Slightly ahead of Norway and Pakistan. Perhaps the equal of Thailand.

23 posted on 09/07/2007 10:14:59 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

you are still an ass


24 posted on 09/09/2007 7:39:32 AM PDT by albertabound (Its good to beeee Alberta Bound ( Go Flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

And you are still intellectually challenged. Perhaps Canada needed a ‘No Child Left Behind’ program when you were in school.


25 posted on 09/09/2007 11:27:51 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Listen you mealy mouthed nitwit, clowns like you wonder why the U.S. gets a world wide bad rap while with your next breath you badmouth and denigrate your closest and best friend and ally with meaningless and poorly researched B.S.

Canada is pulling her weight in this war on terror and is bringing her fair share of young men and women home in bodybags, some the victims of U.S.forces friendly fire I might add, so why don’t you just STFU.


26 posted on 09/10/2007 9:31:11 PM PDT by albertabound (Its good to beeee Alberta Bound ( Go Flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

No thanks. And I continue to suggest that you invest in a course in reading comprehension. You were badly shortchanged in your education.


27 posted on 09/11/2007 8:00:21 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: albertabound; PAR35
"Canada is pulling her weight in this war on terror and is bringing her fair share of young men and women home in bodybags, some the victims of U.S.forces friendly fire I might add, so why don’t you just STFU.

Here is the thing. I've noticed many Canadian FReepers seem to get upset when an American makes a fair criticism of the way Canada has allowed it's military to whither away to the anemic state that it is currently in. No one is challenging the bravery or quality of Canadian soldiers/sailors! Quite frankly I'm tired of the snide, underhanded remarks coming from Canadians about US friendly fire. Did you ever stop to think that perhaps the reason Americans are involved in what seems a disproportionate number of these incidents are because we are the ones providing 98.9999% of the close air support missions over there? I wonder how many Canadian soldiers have had their bacon saved by those "trigger happy" Americans? No way to quantify that one huh? Perhaps you Canadians should direct your anger at your own govt. for allowing your military to get in a state where you have to hitch rides on second hand Russian cargo planes, and are unable to provide your own close air support eh?
28 posted on 09/12/2007 3:57:20 AM PDT by Boris99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Boris99

Thanks.


29 posted on 09/12/2007 8:44:14 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Boris99

You are a pompous hypocrite. You unreservedly offer your opinion on the current state of the Canadian Military with great authority yet discount my critical comment as snide and underhanded. Well, quite frankly, I am just as tired of the uninformed horseshit some of you bozo’s peddle on these threads as well. You like to dish it out but can’t take it.

Canadian’s have always stood up to be counted when confronted with tyrants, often without state of the art weaponry, but we stood up anyway and took out lumps. sometimes while America sat on it’s ass. ( another snide and underhanded comment that will surely piss you off)


30 posted on 09/14/2007 8:54:28 PM PDT by albertabound (Its good to beeee Alberta Bound ( Go Flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

There’s the Canadian chest thumping that I know and love! Oh well I guess the US should just go back to sitting on its ass. It’s what we’re known for eh?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1896863/posts


31 posted on 09/15/2007 5:48:37 AM PDT by Boris99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson