Skip to comments.
Global Warming to Fuel More Severe Tornadoes and Thunderstorms
Live Science.com ^
| August 30, 2007
| Andrea Thompson - Live Science
Posted on 08/30/2007 8:15:35 AM PDT by RoadKingSE
Global warming will make severe thunderstorms and tornadoes a more common feature of U.S. weather, NASA scientists said today.
Climate models have previously shown that Earth will see more heavy rainstorms as the atmosphere warms, but a new climate model developed by NASA researchers is the first to show the difference in strength between storms that occur over land and those over the ocean and how storms strengths will change in general.
The models don't directly simulate thunderstorms and lightning, but look for conditions that are ripe for severe storms to form.
The model was tested against current climate conditions and produced well known major global storm features, including the high levels of lightning seen over Africa and the Amazon basin and the near absence of lightning in ocean storms.
(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; globalwarming; globalwarmingping; nasa; thunderstorms; tornadoes; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
Would someone please help me understand what it is we've received in exchange for all the billions of taxpayer dollars we've sunk into NASA to keep the Trekkies and Tech Heads entertained for the last 20 years.
To: RoadKingSE
Global Warming to Fuel More Severe Tornadoes and Thunderstorms Well, the Hurricane angle didn't pan out, so...
2
posted on
08/30/2007 8:17:06 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: RoadKingSE
Andrea Thompson=8-0
Nah, can't be....
3
posted on
08/30/2007 8:17:44 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: RoadKingSE
Hasn’t NASA already been proven to be full of brown smelly stuff on this subject?
4
posted on
08/30/2007 8:17:57 AM PDT
by
NRA1995
(To Congress and Mr. President: This is OUR country, and don't you forget it!)
To: RoadKingSE
You know that float thousands of these catastrophic predictions out there in the hopes that one will stick. Every possible change in any weather event has been predicted so that no matter what happens they can be shown to be ‘right’. So what if they miss on the other 99%, they only need to get one ‘right’ and the media will headline it.
To: RoadKingSE
Drudge also headline that less then half of scientist believe in GW. The vast majority understand GW is a religion and a modern day scam on everyone.
6
posted on
08/30/2007 8:18:35 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: RoadKingSE
what it is we've received in exchange for all the billions of taxpayer dollars we've sunk into NASA Ignoring the self-answering part of the request, the purpose of NASA is to keep the USA pre-eminent in space. The USA is pre-eminent in space. QED
7
posted on
08/30/2007 8:21:40 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Always Right
I stopped at a light yesterday and about 3 squeegie guys came out to clean my windshield. I swear they all worked at the Weather Channel’s Hurricane Center.
“No storm, no paycheck!”
8
posted on
08/30/2007 8:22:27 AM PDT
by
Holicheese
(1-21-09 Hillary starts to destroy America!)
To: RoadKingSE
I’ve said it before in jest, but now I think there might be a grain of truth in it: NASA’s James Hansen is looking for a cushy retirement on the board of one of Al Gore’s “Carbon Credit” companies.
9
posted on
08/30/2007 8:22:50 AM PDT
by
JennysCool
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
To: edcoil
Of the 2500 UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change “scientists” who presented their recent “consensus”, fewer than 50 had any scientific qualifications.
To: RoadKingSE
11
posted on
08/30/2007 8:23:08 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Always Right
Why in the h,e, double l, do we need to have weather reports from NASA? What the heck is NASA doing that the NOAA, the National Weather Service, and every friggin local news station with a Doppler Radar station, can’t do?
To: NRA1995
If NASA says it, it must be right, comrade.
13
posted on
08/30/2007 8:24:23 AM PDT
by
sinanju
To: NRA1995
If NASA says it, it must be right, comrade.
14
posted on
08/30/2007 8:24:25 AM PDT
by
sinanju
To: RoadKingSE
Sorry, this does not fit into MY theory of Global Weather Balance. My theory holds that weather on the Earth will fluctuate betweening warmer and cooler temps for any number of years, and that over long times (hundreds of years) the temperature will vary only slightly.
15
posted on
08/30/2007 8:24:50 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: RoadKingSE
All this money to conclude that it gets hot in the summer.
16
posted on
08/30/2007 8:26:09 AM PDT
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Reunite Gondwanaland!)
To: RoadKingSE
Seems NASA has too many personnel drinking alcohol wearing a wig and adult diapers and carrying a roll of duct tape.....
To: RoadKingSE
And next we’ll hear it’s going to be cold this winter.
18
posted on
08/30/2007 8:26:51 AM PDT
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Reunite Gondwanaland!)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I am unaware of any real scientist that would have any association with the UN.
19
posted on
08/30/2007 8:28:33 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: RoadKingSE
There was an article in my paper just yesterday that stated 2006 edged out 1998 as the hottest year on record. GW is a great example of the big lie. If you repeat it often enough, everyone will believe.
I discussed the "revised" NASA data with a die hard democrat the other day. She wouldn't believe that NASA updated their data. Furthermore, she stated that "IF" NASA updated their data, it was because Bush told them to.
George Bush, evil overlord. BDS is real.
20
posted on
08/30/2007 8:28:49 AM PDT
by
wbill
To: RoadKingSE
Climate models have previously shown that Earth will see more heavy rainstorms as the atmosphere warms, but a new climate model developed by NASA researchers is the first to show the difference in strength between storms that occur over land Climate Models.....random number generators would be more accurate.
To: RightWhale
Ignoring the self-answering part of the request, the purpose of NASA is to keep the USA pre-eminent in space. The USA is pre-eminent in space. QED Hey NASA! Thanks for the Tang. Oh and those astronaut diapers, COOL.
I think I'd rather have my tax dollars fund pre-eminence in development of IED-proof combat vehicles, or a suicidal islamist extermination spray. I can watch Channel 13 for the weather report. Cape Canaveral would make a nice golf resort.
To: RoadKingSE
Global Warming to Fuel More Severe Tornadoes and Thunderstorms
No, it won't. The temperature rise has been in the higher rather than lower latitudes and in nighttime rather than daytime temperatures. The severity of a thunderstorm depends to a large degree on the temperature difference between cold and warm air masses. If the more northerly colder, drier air masses are progressively less cold, then the difference between them and the more southerly warmer, humid air masses is less pronounced, meaning a reduced chance for violent thnuderstorms and tornados.
23
posted on
08/30/2007 8:36:43 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: RoadKingSE
NASA did not develop Tang. Since you apparently favor military applications, you would be aware that 2/3 of NASA is support for military applications.
24
posted on
08/30/2007 8:38:25 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Izzy Dunne
LOL, right, in fact the Hurricane predictions have proved to be abysmally wrong in the past 2 years.
To: RoadKingSE
The models don't directly simulate thunderstorms and lightning, but look for conditions that are ripe for severe storms to form. So, we made it all up.........algore can thank us later.......
26
posted on
08/30/2007 8:39:46 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: RoadKingSE
The title should be:
Threat of Global Warming to fuel more coverage of tornadoes and thunderstorms.
27
posted on
08/30/2007 8:40:03 AM PDT
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: RoadKingSE
Since we now know everything causes globull warming, today, China says one child limit, male only, to help globull warming — Hey I have a thought ...
28
posted on
08/30/2007 8:42:40 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: RoadKingSE
I'm still waiting for the approximate date of Climatic Nirvana (TM) against which today's climate is compared. After all, if we are destroying the environment, surely there are definable characteristics of the optimal climate and when it occurred.
To: RoadKingSE
a new climate model developed by NASA researchers
Climate model. The latest video game for "researchers".
To: RoadKingSE
31
posted on
08/30/2007 8:52:28 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: aruanan
Well, that consider that tornadoes and thunderstorms are the result of ^weather^, not ^climate^.
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Sorry...
“...that AND consider...
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: RoadKingSE
And they still can’t predict tornadoes.
35
posted on
08/30/2007 8:56:23 AM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
To: RoadKingSE
Global warming to fuel more weather of all kinds. More heat, more cold, more wind, more calm, more rain, more drought. All weather proves global warming, all hail global warming.
36
posted on
08/30/2007 8:57:02 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(concerning His promise.....not willing that any (of whom?) should perish but that all...)
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: RoadKingSE
Yes, Yes, we’re all going to die. I got the message.
I wish NASA would focus on things like keeping the space shuttles from disintegrating rather than wasting their time on this trash.
38
posted on
08/30/2007 8:59:40 AM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(I'm not here to make friends.)
To: RoadKingSE
I'm scratching my head about this. The global warming prediction has the greatest temperature increase in nighttime arctic temperatures, while the least change is in tropic daytime temperatures. If the arctic temperatures are closer to the tropic temperatures, it seems like the weather would be LESS severe because the most thunderstorms are caused by large differences between cold and warm areas.
39
posted on
08/30/2007 9:02:28 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
To: Eagles Talon IV
right, in fact the Hurricane predictions have proved to be abysmally wrong in the past 2 years.Please allow me to refer you back to another poster on this thread:
Throw up a thousand predictions and one is bound to stick.
OTOH, I predict we'll be hearing from the GW disciples every spring how the coming hurricane season is gonna be "da worstest evah!".
40
posted on
08/30/2007 9:06:48 AM PDT
by
woofer
(Earth First! We'll mine the other eight later.)
To: RightWhale
NASA did not develop Tang. Since you apparently favor military applications, you would be aware that 2/3 of NASA is support for military applications. Okay I'll concede that Tang was probably paid for with a Robert Byrd "earmark" to Kraft Foods. And I'm onboard with the support of mil apps.
However the Space Station is fast becoming Space Edsel. And I didn't leave anything on Mars the last time I was there. But it's Hansen and his Gorebal Warming idiots at NASA that really chap my @$$.
To: RightWhale
NASA did not develop Tang. Since you apparently favor military applications, you would be aware that 2/3 of NASA is support for military applications. Okay I'll concede that Tang was probably paid for with a Robert Byrd "earmark" to Kraft Foods. And I'm onboard with the support of mil apps.
However the Space Station is fast becoming Space Edsel. And I didn't leave anything on Mars the last time I was there. But it's Hansen and his Gorebal Warming idiots at NASA that really chap my @$$.
To: RoadKingSE
Sorry for the double post. My mouse stuttered.
To: RoadKingSE
Hansen actually has overstepped his position. He ought to take his retirement and move to a Liberal university. What he has been doing is far from space program stuff anyway.
44
posted on
08/30/2007 9:14:13 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: RoadKingSE
"Global warming will make severe thunderstorms and tornadoes a more common feature of U.S. weather, NASA scientists said today."Some may have said this, but they are just alarmists. Tornados, and the thunderstorms that they result from, derive their energy from the average energy of the atmosphere. The average energy of the atmosphere is proportional to the absolute temperature, so any change will be according to the ratio of the 2 temperatures involved.
So for a 1o change,
Tfinal/Tinitial = 292/291 = 0.0034 = 0.34%
So, 0.34%/oC is all the extra energy available to do what they claim. That's not a significant increase at all, and it's flat out fraud to claim that it is.
45
posted on
08/30/2007 9:15:02 AM PDT
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: woofer
Thanks, I did see that and i agree. It has long been the method of alarmists that the get every opportunity to cry gloom and doom and yet never get called back to be confronted when they are wrong. But when they are right, that 1 time out of 100 they become media darlings for as long as the lamestream libs can drag it out.
To: spunkets
So, 0.34%/oC is all the extra energy available to do what they claim. That's not a significant increase at all, and it's flat out fraud to claim that it is. You're telling me. (:^D)
To: RoadKingSE
I’m starting to think the people that wanted to abolish NASA and put the money into social programs may have had a better idea
/sarc
48
posted on
08/30/2007 9:18:40 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: RoadKingSE
Future Headline: Scientists Say Fewer Hurricanes, T-Storms, Tornados Confirm Global Warming. (Omigod, We’re all gonna die.)
49
posted on
08/30/2007 9:21:02 AM PDT
by
NaughtiusMaximus
("The stool pigeon is the coming race." - Jack Black, <i>You Can't Win</i>)
To: RoadKingSE
Normal weather has now become a fear factor of (100).
This is growing old. Hysteria never lasted long in America.
50
posted on
08/30/2007 9:21:11 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson