Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remains of Czar Nicholas II's Son May Have Been Found
FOXNews.com ^ | August 24, 2007 | Associated Press

Posted on 08/24/2007 3:54:00 AM PDT by NCDragon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: bobjam

Ivan the Terrible reigned in the 1500s and most of his ‘terrible’ acts were committed AGAINST the aristocracy to bring them under his control. The peasants simply weren’t considered worth bothering with, so the magnitude of the crimes was rather small.

While acknowleging the authoritarian regimes of the Tsars several hundred years ago, the systematic brutalization of the entire populace of the Euro-Asian land mass, including gulags, planned starvation of masses of people (ethnic genocide) and killing off of small landowners is an invention of the 20th century.

While claiming Communism was the modern-day enlightened and compassionate political system for the benefit of the masses, Lenin, Stalin and their cronies killed, abused, tortured, and psychically crushed more people than all the ancient Tsars put together.

Wasn’t it one of the Bosheviks who said that one death is a tragedy, but a million deaths is just a statistic?


21 posted on 08/24/2007 10:50:41 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
Understand this and understand it well...

Let's add to that. No system of absolute power ever turns out well. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The end result is destructiveness and mass murder. Man is fundamentally flawed and incapable of constructively wielding absolute power like some kind of god.

22 posted on 08/24/2007 11:29:27 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
While it is awful what the Communists did to these people and millions like them, it is important to remember that the Romanov Dynasty was a dictatorship vested with absolute power just like the Bolsheviks. The Revolution of 1917 simply replaced one regime with another

Not entirely true. The Russian Orthodox Church was a stabilizing institution during the Tsars' reigns.

23 posted on 08/24/2007 1:18:42 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

The Russian Church spent most of the Czarist era behaving as the Czars saw fit. Czar Peter the Great forced reforms in the Russian Church prompting the schismatic Old Believers church. A later Czar even forced the clergy to wear Lutheran style vestments. Like the Catholic bishops in 18th Century France or the Episcopal bishops in 19th Century America, the Russian bishops did little in the face of aristocratic abuse of the people.

Patriarch Alexi II probably exercises more power and influence that any of his predecessors over the last several centuries.


24 posted on 08/27/2007 4:42:01 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson