Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. admiral: Russian bombers never got within 500 kilometers of Guam
NY Times ^ | 8/10/07

Posted on 08/10/2007 11:36:26 AM PDT by bnelson44

The U.S. Pacific Fleet commander said Russian bombers never got within 300 miles (500 kilometers) of Guam this week and did not fly over the U.S. territory as a Russian air force general claimed.

Navy Adm. Robert F. Willard disputed that U.S. fighters intercepted the bombers. The admiral said the Russian aircraft never got close enough to the Pacific island or the massive U.S. military exercises being held nearby, to warrant such action.

"U.S. planes went to an orbit point in preparation for an intercept that never occurred because the Bears didn't get close enough," Willard said in an interview Thursday using a slang term for the Russian planes.

(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guam

1 posted on 08/10/2007 11:36:29 AM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
"U.S. planes went to an orbit point in preparation for an intercept that never occurred because the Bears didn't get close enough,"

They were testing our readiness, and they'd have also taken a lot of pictures and gotten a lot of info about electronic frequencies used if we had let them get closer. Kudos to the Navy for watching our "friends" the Russkies

2 posted on 08/10/2007 11:52:19 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Wait a minute! The Russians were, were...were...lying? What?! No way!


3 posted on 08/10/2007 11:54:33 AM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

I know it’s hard to believe


4 posted on 08/10/2007 11:57:42 AM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Hey, this aint like the 1960s, this is like the 1860s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

FYI:
“Bear” is not a SLANG term for the Russian bombers; it is the official name of the TU-95, with “Bear” being the NATO designator. Typical lack of grasp of details by the reporter.


5 posted on 08/10/2007 12:00:08 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

bookmark


6 posted on 08/10/2007 12:01:29 PM PDT by 4woodenboats (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

Well...sort of slang. NATO designated slang. All NATO names for Soviet bombers started with “B” (Bear, Bison, Badger, Backfire, etc.) whereas Soviet fighters were designated names starting with “F” (Fishbed, Faggot, Flogger, Foxbat, etc.).


7 posted on 08/10/2007 12:06:24 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

There are so many US tracking RADARs in that area of the world that there is no way a Russian anything flew over Guam without notice.


8 posted on 08/10/2007 12:08:37 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Msg to Pootie Poot:

[Flash]

Your southern flank is not secure. I repeat, your southern flank is not secure.

[End]

Why Ivan is trying to flex his muscles, I don't know. Those TU-95 are Falcon food.

5.56mm

9 posted on 08/10/2007 12:13:12 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
They were flying their new stealth Potatoe powered Vodka Bomber.
10 posted on 08/10/2007 12:25:29 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

If I were a Russian military pilot, I’m not so sure I would want to fly a plane called a “Faggot.”

How many guys want to be called a “faggot” pilot?


11 posted on 08/10/2007 12:34:53 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My number one goal in life is to leave a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nabber
It’s a good thing the Russians didn’t try a flyover with Mig 15s. The NATO codename would not be politically correct.
12 posted on 08/10/2007 12:40:18 PM PDT by Nakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Good point. How would you like to get shot down by a faggot? This is another time we can blame the Brits. They smoke fags and keep a dry faggot around for a cold winter night and for some reason, they designate MiG-15s faggots.
13 posted on 08/10/2007 12:41:30 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Those TU-95 are Falcon food.

Falcons are so passe'. A Raptor could have taken them out before they even knew there was another plane nearby.

14 posted on 08/10/2007 1:01:43 PM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
I’m not so sure I would want to fly a plane called a “Faggot.”

Good point. If you ignite a faggot, it burns pretty hot.

15 posted on 08/10/2007 1:04:49 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
Russia's trying to make a lot of noise, ping.
16 posted on 08/10/2007 1:06:02 PM PDT by familyop ("I like big, fat men like you. When they fall down,..." --Tuco, in "The Good, the bad, and the ugly")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

So, the Brits “smoke fags”, eh? I was unaware they even had a season for them.

;-)


17 posted on 08/10/2007 1:06:17 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GBA

So, the Brits “smoke fags”, eh? I was unaware they even had a season for them.

;-)


18 posted on 08/10/2007 1:06:43 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Dictator Putin's plausible deniability is not functioning.
19 posted on 08/10/2007 1:41:28 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 3niner
A Raptor could have taken them out before they even knew there was another plane nearby.

Yeah, I wonder how far the Raptors followed the Bears without them (or Ruskie ground radar) even noticing.
20 posted on 08/10/2007 1:43:46 PM PDT by NearlyNormal (Come '08 in November, this I will remember: ANY vote for cloture is a vote FOR amnesty!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

If you use that word you have go into rehab.


21 posted on 08/10/2007 1:47:07 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Considering these things are huge turboprops, this makes sense as everyone yesterday commented that they are slow and you can see em coming a mile away, so how could it have happened?


22 posted on 08/10/2007 3:09:57 PM PDT by jack_napier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

Yap. Only believe a story after it has been confirmned by the NY Times.


23 posted on 08/10/2007 4:45:10 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (The Simpsons already did it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
The Russians were, were...were...lying? What?! No way!

The other great soviet tradition is being revived.

24 posted on 08/10/2007 4:46:47 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

It’s slang if you are only 30 years old and don’t know about NATO or military designators for Russian aircraft.

I’m suprised the lefty presstitute didn’t use the word “slur” insted of “slang”


25 posted on 08/10/2007 4:52:23 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
"U.S. admiral: Russian bombers never got within 500 kilometers of Guam"

Looks like the Russians have learned to keep a really short leash on
their mobile military assets.

Their diplomats in the USA must have seen "The Hunt For Red October"
when it's aired about 100 times on A&E.
And don't want a real-life repeat of some of my all-time favorite
movie dialogue:

Ambassador Andrei Lysenko: There is another matter...
one I'm reluctant to...

Dr. Jeffrey Pelt: Please.

Ambassador Andrei Lysenko: One of our submarines, an Alfa, was last
reported in the area of the Grand Banks. We have not
heard from her for some time.

Dr. Jeffrey Pelt: Andrei, you've lost another submarine?
26 posted on 08/10/2007 5:06:11 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I’d love to go into rehab....especially if Ann Coulter is in there with me! I think she’s hot, and the fact that she irritates liberals on a daily basis makes her all the more attractive.


27 posted on 08/12/2007 7:04:11 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My number one goal in life is to leave a bigger carbon footprint than Al Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson