Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Evidence That Widely Prescribed Statins Protect Against Prostate Cancer
Science Daily ^ | 8-10-2007 | American Association Of Cancer Research

Posted on 08/09/2007 7:39:00 PM PDT by blam

Source: American Association for Cancer Research
Date: August 10, 2007

No Evidence That Widely Prescribed Statins Protect Against Prostate Cancer

Science Daily — A large community-based study refutes previous findings that statins -- a top-selling drug class, worldwide -- might cut one's risk of developing prostate cancer by reducing production of the male hormones that fuel cancer growth.

Researchers from the New England Research Institutes found that while men using statins did indeed have lower blood levels of androgens such as testosterone, it was more likely attributable to poor health rather than the use of statins.

"The public health significance is that our study provides evidence that statins may not have a clinically meaningful impact on testosterone in the blood, although further studies should be done," said study author, Susan A. Hall, Ph.D., a research scientist at the New England Research Institutes. "That doesn't mean that statins may be lowering prostate cancer risk through one or more alternative pathways, but it doesn't appear to be working through reduction of male hormones,

Statins lower cholesterol and are commonly prescribed to treat and prevent heart disease. Since cholesterol is required for the production of male hormones researchers have theorized that statins may reduce production of these hormones. A large, recent study found that men using statin drugs were at lowered risk of developing metastatic or fatal prostate cancer, especially if the drugs were used over a long period of time. But other studies on statin use and prostate cancer risk have had mixed results, according to Hall.

To study a narrow question-- whether statin use reduces androgen concentrations in the blood -- the researchers examined data from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey, a population-based, NIH-sponsored, epidemiologic study. Data were collected between 2002 and 2005 on thousands of men and women with equal representation of African American, Caucasian and Hispanic populations.

The value of the BACH study, according to Hall, is that "we capture real world use of medications in the community, which might be a more realistic representation of their impact on the body, compared to outcomes seen in a clinical trial."

Hall's team studied the medical histories of 1,812 men, including 237 statin users, and analyzed their blood for "free" or unbound testosterone, for total testosterone, and for other associated compounds.

The researchers found no relationship between statin use and free testosterone and most of the other associated compounds. There was a significant association between statin use and level of total testosterone in the blood, but that association vanished when researchers considered the patients' age, body weight, and history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. "We know that men with higher body mass index, diabetes and cardiovascular disease tend to have lower testosterone levels, and this largely accounted for the drop in testosterone in statin users," Hall said.

"In this study, statin use was just a marker for presence of other illnesses," she said. "This study may inform that debate, however, by suggesting that any protective pathway offered by statins, if it exists, is not through androgen suppression."

Findings are published in the August issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

The BACH Survey was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by American Association


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; evidence; prostate; statins

1 posted on 08/09/2007 7:39:03 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

I’m not convinced statins even protect against heart disease.


2 posted on 08/09/2007 7:48:34 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
"I’m not convinced statins even protect against heart disease."

Ditto.

I stopped taking my Lovastatin and Niacin too. They created bladder problems for me.

3 posted on 08/09/2007 7:59:21 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

I’m convinced that statins can make you feel like your muscles have been beaten with a baseball bat.


4 posted on 08/09/2007 8:06:13 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

lol That’s a common side effect due to CoQ10 enzyme depletion.


5 posted on 08/09/2007 8:31:15 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson