Posted on 08/04/2007 12:03:42 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
This is just a partial copy that I was able to get off of another site as Mr Bisbort has removed the original because it "violated the terms and conditions of the blog" not because it was vile or full of bigotry or the fact he is getting slammed in the comments section. He also is not inclined to apologize. Can you imagine a similar thing being said of a non Caucasian or non Christian woman? One other thing to note he rails about taxpayer money for education. The Duggars home school their children.
TOO MANY PEOPLE
Michelle Duggar of Rogers, Arkansas is a bitch in heat. Literally. She just gave birth to her 17th puppy, er, child. The tone of the Associated Press story that accompanied this horrifying news was one of celebration. I mean, my gosh, 17 children! In a world bursting at the seams with more than 6 billion of us! This is nothing to celebrate. This is something to curse. For one, the taxpayers of Rogers, Arkansas must be up in arms. They have to foot the bills for all these kids educations, the public services to water them and wash their shit, piss and puke away, the roads to carry their trucks and SUVs, the public welfare to support them when they falter. And just imagine how much the neighbors on either side of them just love the Duggars!
Egads. Idont understand the tolerance that we have for this as a society. For Gods sake, will someone tell Mr. Duggar (who is, of course, named Jim Bob) to get fixed and/or Mrs. Duggar to get spayed?
Are you ready for more nausea? Get this: The entire brood of Duggar pups live in a 7,000 square foot home, and every single one of the puppies names starts with J. Among the "fun facts" listed on Discovery Health's Web page devoted to the Duggars: the Duggars have gone through an estimated 90,000 diapers, and Mrs. Duggaraka Queen Bitchhas been pregnant for 126 months or 10.5 years of her adult life.
Why is this story treated as something other than what it is: grotesque and freakish?
It is amazing how in denial we all are about human overpopulation. Put simply (and we all know it, but wont say it out loud): There are too many fucking people. There are too many people fucking, and not using contraception.
As my friend Parke says, Instead of being celebrated, their profligate procreation should be decried and mandatory sterilization imposed immediately upon these crazy people. I propose: a progressive federal tax on children beyond the second one per couple. Or at least eliminating tax deductions for them.The single most important issue of our time is the one no one talks about: overpopulation. You would think it's a four-letter word from the way that politicians of all stripes avoid it.
One wonder if this person would have the balls to say that about a Muslim Woman?
It’s amazing when you look back at the 1900’s here in America, women had so many children. Just amazing. I understand that in Mexico the national average is 2 kids per woman, but guess what the average Mexican birthrate is when they come to America? 6.
The problem in this country is that people either have few or no children or children without fathers, etc.
We need illegal immigrants to keep our economy going because too few babies have been born in recent years.
I personally hope the Duggars have more children... even if all that does is make a leftist's head explode :)
The poetic justice in all this is that if good people like the Duggars keep having lots of kids (not everyone has 17, but 3-5 is still above replacement level), we will eventually breed out the pieces of human trash like the letter writer.
Demographics are great, when they work FOR you.
ditto, personally as the mother of 4, I am a bit envious. What a blessing to have so many children.
In the industrialized world populations are falling below replacement numbers.
Overpoupulation is junk science from the 70’s. If you assume an average family size of 4 people, you could give every family in the world 1 acre to live on and only use up 2/3 or the land of the USA.
The left considers people like this family ‘breeders’. Frankly, I’m glad she and her husband have so many good kids. They, and the kids of other ‘breeders’ will eventually outlast the left because the left, with their enviro-wacko notions, aren’t having kids. For this reason, the left, for the most part, will eventually die out.
ESPECIALLY if all that does is make a leftist's head explode :)
I hope the Dear Lord blesses him/her with noooo children!! Can you imagine this person for a parent? The language itself is enough to make a sailor blush!
Another person that hates people.
Agreed! :)
AS the author referred, the Duggar’s primary sin is doubtless that they’re caucasian/Christian.
Ok, which one of you VRWC guards let this lunatic out of the psych ward?
What a disgusting little viper.
A pity his mother bred him.
There is such anger on the left. They are so angry that they can’t even think straight. All 17 of these children, because they are homeschooled, will probably grow up to be TAXPAYING citizens. They will help to support this angry man in his old age via Social Security et al.
This guy lays it on a little thick but his basic theme is in line with the Liberal Democratic platform. Surprised he had time to write this with Yearly Kos going on.
You would have to ask Mrs. Duggar that, or my Mom, who had 12 of us. My parents did ok, we are all healthy, law abiding, principled people, and wouldn’t have had it any other way.
Yes, times have certainly changed. My parents were born in 1900 (Dad) and 1911 (Mom), each into large families. I had 20 sets of aunts and uncles (most passed on now) and approximately 90 first cousins. That kind of growth in population, useful in a rural, farming community, could not be sustained now, but I would never fault anyone for having more than 2.4 children as long as they can support and educate them.
At the same time folks down in NC are all up in arms over involuntary sterilization of the mentally defective in the middle of the last century.
We already know they hate life. At least they’re being consistent, with a respectable intensity of vulgarity.
Somewhere between this article’s unbalanced view and your unbalanced response (in the title) there is a balanced perspective. Agreed that the 17th child is no less human than the 1st or should be discussed in any terms than those we would use to discuss any other human being. At the same time, every advanced society, including the Chinese, recognize the problems of overpopulation and folks modify their activities accordingly. Much of the hatred directed against Bush is a reaction to the fact that he, personally, is insensitive to the impacts of population growth in the US, the principal contributor to which is illegal immigration. So, I don’t think that this woman, and her husband, should be freed from expressions of opporbrium on their excess contributions to demands on land and public resources. I think your view that we need to run a competition between native and nonnative breeders to see who can increase the population most rapidly is a, I believe futile, recipe for disaster.
He is talking about the home too. I know I watched a program on these folks and they built that home over the course of several years. They built it! Not taxpayers and besides with a house that big...they’re paying their fair share.
12-17, what’s the difference. We always had extras around anyway. Our house was THE place to go play LOL. Really once you pass 10, a few more is nothing. God has blessed them richly with 17 healthy children.
I pity any of his progeny. What a hateful person.
This is the true left shining through. The left is full of fascists and tyrant wannabes. My guess is this person would prefer to kill the Duggars rather than sterilize them.
I like the Duggars. I always thought Mr. Duggar was a lucky guy for finding his wife. If there were more families like the Duggars, we would have a better country.
Remember, the left isn't breeding. That's why they have to rely on lies, propaganda, and indoctrination.
Mrs. Duggar is the antithesis of the women I'm mocking with my tag line and I've always wondered where the women like her went, but I think I know what happened.
From what I saw on the show on TLC about them, the mother takes care of the baby/youngest and the older children are each responsible for a younger child - a "buddy" they called it. Mom's "buddy" is always the baby, the rest are organized by and older one who make sure their buddy is taken care of. They didn't go into a lot of detail of how much the older has to do, but it appeared to make sure they were dressed properly, teeth/hair brushed, buckled in when in the vehicle, things of that nature.
From another practical standpoint, the mom was dead lucky that several of the older ones were girls who tend to just be better at that type of thing. I also think that chores are divied out also. One show had a feature on their new laundry facilities and one child was pointed out that it would make her life so much easier and that the new kitchen would help another.
But I also go the feeling that they all do things together a whole lot, which of course makes things easier too.
The oldest is a 19 year old boy - I wonder if he has gone off to college? Anyone know?
Flown over the country in a jet lately? We are so far from overpopulation it’s laughable.
I’ve seen some of the shows about them, and they accept quite a bit of charity in the form of food and clothing donations, etc. Does anybody have a problem with their popping out more babies when they can’t support the ones they already have? Granted, they don’t seem to be drawing any government support (at least none that I know of,) but it still seems to me that they’re sponging off other people to support their chosen lifestyle. Donning flame-retardant suit.
And that's the important thing.
Jumpin’ jimminy! This writer definitely makes a case for legal abortion. Her own.
“For one, the taxpayers of Rogers, Arkansas must be up in arms. They have to foot the bills for all these kids educations, the public services to water them and wash their shit, piss and puke away, the roads to carry their trucks and SUVs, the public welfare to support them when they falter. And just imagine how much the neighbors on either side of them just love the Duggars!
1)The Duggars homeschool. No tax dollars for that. They run their own businesses. They GENERATE taxes.
2)They never use public services. Part of their faith is self sustinance.
3)Also part of their faith is helping others. They help keep others from faltering, and using public income. And when they “falter”, they lift each other up. That’s why people always had large families before SS.
5)They don’t have SUVs. The family drives around in a bus they refurbished. I imagine as they get older there will be some individual vehicles, but they don’t believe in consumptive opulence as a family. They don’t even watch TV - they believe in playing outside or reading, instead.
They built their own house with their own hands, and live on a very large piece of land. I assume their neighbors love having charitable people who love to “help out” around.
Clueless.
You could fit them all in Texas, I believe.
The filth doesn't have any, without a doubt.
He's just a vile, disgusting snake, probably unkempt, unshaven, living in some horrid hovel piled high with crap, and spewing at a world he was unfortunately born into and never connected with.
In other words, he's a Democrat.
17 is very impressive. I’d like to see her have a few more just for the novelty of it. And why not? When you got 17 rugrats, what’s a couple more? I’ve never heard of any woman having more than 15. All I can say is WOW! I’m impressed. Seventeen kids and they are actually all cared for. It’s amazing. I have no kids. I should send them a letter asking them to have one more as a favor to me to make up for me having none.
Just another @$$hole who can’t get over the fact that Paul Erlich was wrong, is wrong, and will continue to be wrong.
It is always a productive strategy to read liberals/leftists with a critical mind, understanding that they idealize "the pee-pul" in the abstract, but in reality hate "the masses." Just one more illustration of how anti-human the left really is.
I think they can support themselves fairly well - if companies want to donate for publicity more power to them. That’s marketing at work.
When they built their house I think they intended to furnish it themselves. I know TLC arranged to give them some furnishings, but I don’t have a problem with that as long as they aren’t accepting government help.
Another liberal celebrates freedom of choice. </sarc>
Once the global warming thing works no longer...this is the next great leftist cause to turn into a demagogic furor.
Just lovely, they'll become millions and millions of little Kervorkians...without even his standards of morality (meaning they'll want to kill everyone who thinks different than they are).
Leftist iconoclasts define themselves with every word that comes from their mouths.
My "unbalanced" response as you call it was in regard to the typical leftist hypocritical positions particularly on all things Christian and white.
I think your view that we need to run a competition between native and nonnative breeders to see who can increase the population most rapidly is a, I believe futile, recipe for disaster.
Competition? Where did I say that? it is an ASSumption on your part.
They keep track of all the kids by actually teaching and demanding all their children learn and accept responsibility.
That's because all of us suckers pay a truckload of taxes to support them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.