Posted on 08/03/2007 4:50:56 AM PDT by JohnA
MOSCOW - Advantages of Russia's firefighting fleet of aircraft over foreign competition are apparent, Emergency Situations Minister Sergei Shoigu told a press conference at RIA Novosti Tuesday as he spoke about Russia's recent effort to help several European nations fight rampant fires.
"One Ilyushin 76 tanker carries seven times more water than a Canadair. It takes 42 tons of water on board, while a Canadair carries only 6 tons," Shoigu said.
The minister also mentioned outstanding performance features of Russia's B-200 plane and MI-26 helicopter, which alongside Il-76 play a key role in the ministry's firefighting campaigns.
"B-200 takes twice as much water [as a Canadair], its crew is two times smaller, it can offload four times more water after a single fueling," said Shoigu. Russian firefighting planes can also land on water and take off from it, he added.
According to Shoigu, Russia's serial manufacturing of such aircraft is unrivaled globally in terms of quality and performance features.
Since July 21 Russian aircraft have splashed water to put out fires raging in Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, Montenegro and Portugal. During the July 21-30 span these aircraft have logged in 59 hours 48 minutes of flight time, releasing a total of 2,694 tons of water.
Speaking about a concerted continental effort to curb fires, Shoigu said that Russia's earlier initiative to set up a European Center for Fighting Catastrophes hasn't achieved visible progress yet as Moscow's European partners keep delaying action on the issue.
Smokey the Russian Bear.
Wowsers!! In 9 days multiple planes logged almost 60 hours of flight time.
I’m glad to see Russia competing in a positive way, they need much more of this than in supplying Iran or China with arms. Second, yes their planes hold more water, but with their greater size is there a cost in manueverability? Can their planes fill up with water by skimming a lake?
That’s from this NATO exercise: http://www.nato.int/multi/photos/2002/m020925d.htm
Interesting. The Be200 looks to be a considerably larger plane than the CL-415, which would make sense considering its considerably larger payload. I wonder if it need a comparably larger body of water to “land” and climb out from, compared to the CL-415? I also wonder about its fuel efficiency with turbofan engines as opposed to the turboprops of the Bombardier.
In any case, as you say, the CL-415 is not the ideal tool for every circumstance. If you don’t use a ball peen hammer for a sledge hammer job, the converse also holds true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.