Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amtrak Boots Kids Off Train
cnn ^ | 7-25-07

Posted on 07/25/2007 7:01:07 AM PDT by LouAvul

Conductor Tossed Kids For Disorderly Conduct, Amtrak Says

TAOS, N.M. -- Four children, ages 12 to 15, were removed from an Amtrak train in the dark, 600 miles from home, after accusations that one of them stole an iPod.

No charges were filed against any of the children, who spent the night at the Kingman, Ariz., police station after Amtrak put them off the train at 2 a.m. Saturday as they returned home from California. Police let the four stay in the conference room until a parent retrieved them.

Zackary Sharfin, 13, and his 12-year-old brother Christopher had traveled with family friends Carley Maestas, 15, and her 13-year-old brother Anthony to visit the Maestas' children's mother in Fresno.

The brothers' father, Peter Sharfin, said the problem likely started when Christopher lost his cell phone and Zackary began looking for it.

A Kingman police report also said Zackary was accused of stealing a cell phone and of touching a child.

Zackary said he was walking through the train, looking for his brother's phone, and bumped into a girl by accident. He also said he found the iPod in the train's game room and was trying to turn it in.

Peter Sharfin accused Amtrak of overreacting and abusing the children.

............

Amtrak spokeswoman Vernae Graham said conductors have the right to remove passengers and that they always call police to pick them up at the next station.

Graham said the conductor removed the kids for disorderly conduct, although she did not have details.

"All I know is that it was disorderly conduct, and that could have been a variety of behaviors," Graham said. "It takes a lot for someone to be removed from a train."

(Excerpt) Read more at kpho.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: amtrak; chitchat; rail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-192 next last

1 posted on 07/25/2007 7:01:08 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Four children, ages 12 to 15, on a train 600 miles from home, at 2 a.m.

What were their parents thinking?

Without more (and reliable) information, it seems to me that Amtrak's removing them from the train might not have been the smartest move. Couldn't they all have been placed in seats under supervision until the train reached its destination?

2 posted on 07/25/2007 7:04:23 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Go ahead and water the lawn - my give-a-damn's busted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Amtrak spokeswoman Vernae Graham said conductors have the right to remove passengers and that they always call police to pick them up at the next station.

Which they do at a drop of the hat. Like that guy having a diabetic episode the other day. We don't need your kind on OUR train.

3 posted on 07/25/2007 7:06:21 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

What kind of jerks send children on a cross-country train trip without supervision?

Good for Amtrak. I hope to see this trend spread to the airlines. (They can send the police to the impact crater.)


4 posted on 07/25/2007 7:06:32 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Couldn't they all have been placed in seats under supervision until the train reached its destination?

I don't think it should be Atrak's job to babysit. I think they did the right thing by the accounts given above.

5 posted on 07/25/2007 7:07:33 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim; RockinRight; Hoodlum91; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; najida; Xenalyte

Happy to be a FREERIDER ping!


6 posted on 07/25/2007 7:08:03 AM PDT by Allegra (23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

I don’t think there’s enough information to say whether it was the right thing, or even, as I said, the smartest thing.

In hindsight, the smartest thing would have been not letting a group of unaccompanied young adolescents board the train!


7 posted on 07/25/2007 7:10:02 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Go ahead and water the lawn - my give-a-damn's busted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Why is it that nobody seems to be able to use some common sense when dealing with these situations?
What was probably a minor incident (kids goofing around and perhaps being smart alecks) turns into a big mess.


8 posted on 07/25/2007 7:10:22 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Couldn't they all have been placed in seats under supervision until the train reached its destination?

In today's society, probably not. They likely have no one to watch them... they would worry about being sued... I really don't think that they believed they had much choice.

9 posted on 07/25/2007 7:10:43 AM PDT by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I have no doubt that the kids are telling their parents one thing, and what actually went on is another story. [FYI, I’ve raised 4 children of my own.] Children at this age, especially cooped up on a train with no adult, are going to find something to do. That something isn’t always good.
I can’t imagine sending my kids unescorted cross-country.


10 posted on 07/25/2007 7:10:52 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
What kind of jerks send children on a cross-country train trip without supervision?

Literally thousands every day. I would wager that at least 60% of commercial flights have one or more unaccompanied minors on them.

11 posted on 07/25/2007 7:10:56 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("It's like being a house elf, but without the job satisfaction.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
They likely have no one to watch them

They likely have a bunch of union employees getting a paycheck for watching the scenery go by ... but it's probably against the rules for them to be asked to do something useful.

No matter what, they're likely to be sued, though.

12 posted on 07/25/2007 7:12:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Go ahead and water the lawn - my give-a-damn's busted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

They had a picture of these kids in yesterday’s Abq Journal, they really looked like smug little punks.


13 posted on 07/25/2007 7:14:01 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"Couldn't they all have been placed in seats under supervision."

Supervision by whom. Amtrak doesn't employ babysitters. In fact, they were places in seats under supervision by the police. Hooray for Amtrak.

14 posted on 07/25/2007 7:14:20 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Couldn't they all have been placed in seats under supervision until the train reached its destination?

Amtrak has a hard enough time conducting train operations, never mind supervising brats.

15 posted on 07/25/2007 7:14:24 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate children. Interesting phenomenon.

(They can send the police to the impact crater.)

16 posted on 07/25/2007 7:15:07 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Literally thousands every day. I would wager that at least 60% of commercial flights have one or more unaccompanied minors on them.

Unaccompanied minors on a 1 or 2 hour plane flight are one thing. Unaccompanied minors on a 1, 2 or 3 day train ride are entirely different.

17 posted on 07/25/2007 7:15:16 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Zackary said he was walking through the train, looking for his brother's phone, and bumped into a girl by accident. He also said he found the iPod in the train's game room and was trying to turn it in.

Oh yeah, sure (rolls eyes).

18 posted on 07/25/2007 7:16:31 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops
What was probably a minor incident
I work around 14 year-olds. I seriously doubt it was "a minor incident." Try multiple incidents and, I'll bet, multiple warnings. Kids at this age are prone to ignoring warnings about their behavior because they don't see what's wrong with what they're doing.
19 posted on 07/25/2007 7:17:28 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

That line does peg the ol’ BS meter, no?


20 posted on 07/25/2007 7:18:10 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
What a PR nightmare! If Amtrak doesn't watch itself, people may start turning to passenger rail competitors. </dripping sarcasm>

Like others on this thread have said, there's not enough information to render a solid opinion about this event at this point in time. Obviously, the best case scenario doesn't include 12-16 year olds traveling without adult supervision. I'd like to point out I traveled by Amtrak in the 1980's as a 12 year old, with a friend, sans a parent. I did not get thrown off the train, but I wasn't running around the cars, if I recall.

21 posted on 07/25/2007 7:18:20 AM PDT by GreenAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Sharfin said Amtrak has called several times, but that he does not want to talk to them.

Instead, her lawyer will be wanting to talk to them very shortly...

22 posted on 07/25/2007 7:19:01 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Isn’t it a bit odd that the childrens’ names are mentioned..?

I don’t have children, so maybe my opinion doesn’t mean much, but I don’t think 13-14-15 is too young for “children” to ride a train. At that age I was getting on bus-subway or bus-trolley-Hudson tube to go rummaging for electronics junk in NYC on Canal Street right under the WTC site. And yes, those were different times and I had demonstrated semi mature behavior. Maybe the kidcluster dials up the random behavior.


23 posted on 07/25/2007 7:19:33 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Poor little innocent babies /sarcasm


24 posted on 07/25/2007 7:19:55 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate children. Interesting phenomenon.

I've noticed that as well. Apparently, the great majority of Freepers were very nearly perfect as children.

25 posted on 07/25/2007 7:21:42 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DManA; Allegra
I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate children. Interesting phenomenon.

I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate Freepers who "hate children." Interesting phenomenon.

26 posted on 07/25/2007 7:22:01 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

You really saw hate in that post? I didn’t for instance suggest he take a 20,000 foot leap of an airplane.


27 posted on 07/25/2007 7:23:17 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Peter Sharfin accused Amtrak of overreacting and abusing the children.

Boy, that's a shocker.

/not

28 posted on 07/25/2007 7:25:23 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

The really stupid statement is that of the father who says he felt putting the brats OFF the train was child endangerment. What does he think putting them ON the train in the first place was, if not child endangerment?


29 posted on 07/25/2007 7:26:05 AM PDT by CinnamonBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Oh yeah, sure (rolls eyes).

According to Zack (on the video here), that is what the conductor said, too. LOL

30 posted on 07/25/2007 7:26:27 AM PDT by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

31 posted on 07/25/2007 7:27:34 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

I bet you a year’s salary none of those kids have ever been spanked.


32 posted on 07/25/2007 7:29:25 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“under supervision”

Think “false imprisonment”, “assualt”, “touching a child”, etc. if the “union employees getting a paycheck for watching the scenery go by” attempted to restrict the children to their seats. They have duties to attend to while the train is in motion, union or not, and they don’t include babysitting out of control children for longer than it takes to turn them over the an agent at the next stop.


33 posted on 07/25/2007 7:29:36 AM PDT by RetiredNavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TChris

I don’t claim it is anywhere near a majority. Stories like this really bring them out. Shoot the little bastards.


34 posted on 07/25/2007 7:29:38 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DManA

I don’t think Freepers Hate children, just glad to be rid of ‘em.


35 posted on 07/25/2007 7:30:58 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Children should neither be seen or heard from - ever again.
W. C. Fields


36 posted on 07/25/2007 7:31:40 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mollynme

Dad Sharfin is full of fertilizer, in more ways than one. IMO.


37 posted on 07/25/2007 7:32:47 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

‘Smug little punks.’ You bet your last dollar. It was a fairly strong CONSEQUENCE to something these kids did. I would never have let my son travel alone at that age/ parents should be sued.


38 posted on 07/25/2007 7:33:45 AM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DManA

I don’t hate children as long as they are properly laminated.


39 posted on 07/25/2007 7:33:50 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate Freepers who "hate children." Interesting phenomenon.

I hate Freepers who hate Freepers who hate children. But then again I hate everybody.

40 posted on 07/25/2007 7:34:07 AM PDT by OSHA (Liberals will lick the boot on their necks if they think the other boot is on yours and mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CinnamonBear
The really stupid statement is that of the father who says he felt putting the brats OFF the train was child endangerment. What does he think putting them ON the train in the first place was, if not child endangerment?

Hmmm...it's a trick question; he didn't think at all!

41 posted on 07/25/2007 7:35:30 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
I hate Freepers who hate Freepers who hate children. But then again I hate everybody.

Well said. I hate you.

42 posted on 07/25/2007 7:36:47 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Good G-d, I want to slap them through my monitor!


43 posted on 07/25/2007 7:37:35 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

One of those kids is less than a year away from a driver’s license. I’d have had no issue with my 15 year old son (now 25) doing a trip like the one described with my daughter (3 years younger than him).

It was no cross-country trip either, it was from Fresno to Taos, NM.

If a parent has progressively, and knowingly, provided opportunities for kids to demonstrate responsibility, 15 years old is plenty old enough to travel without their mommies. My observation (and it is only that, I’m making no grand pronouncement) is that parents wait too long to provide those kinds of chances, and our window is pretty short as it is. JMO.


44 posted on 07/25/2007 7:38:52 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CinnamonBear
If Amtrak doen't have the wherewithal to deal with minors don't accept them as passengers. Or charge a surcharge to cover the expense like airlines do.

Or inform the parents "Children are subject to being dropped of in the middle of nowhere for any or no reason at our discretion". That'll solve the problem too.

45 posted on 07/25/2007 7:38:59 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows; DManA; Allegra
I have been noting lately how many Freepers hate Freepers who "hate children."

I've been noting lately how many Freepers don't believe that children should be properly supervised and disciplined.

46 posted on 07/25/2007 7:39:38 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Happy to be a FREERIDER ping!

LOL!!! Now there's a ping list I'd like to join!

I'm tired of trying to defend our childlessness to the parental elite and am happy at the thought of spending my old age with my DH and a big pile of money.

Good for Amtrak - keep those brats out of my way.

47 posted on 07/25/2007 7:41:20 AM PDT by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

In Taos even the adults are smug little punks.


48 posted on 07/25/2007 7:41:44 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Are you sure they don’t have that information out there already?


49 posted on 07/25/2007 7:42:44 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

I can see that...

I have a part time job at a video store (I guess I ought to update my info page) and we have a lot of problems with parents comming in and just letting them go. From toddlers (I kid you not!) on up, some run rampant.

I heard a trio one day discussing playing hide and seek and chase through the store (it’s a fairly large store) while Mom was busy looking for her movies. I called over that it wasn’t a good idea. The middle child, a girl about 9 or 10, SNEERED at me and said, “Well, were JUST children!” She repeated it three times, same phrase, continuing to sneer. My immediate thought was ‘well, yeah, but if you’re just childfen, you better go stand with Mom,’ but I realized that Mom was probably responsible for the ‘just children’ saying every time they got into trouble.

So I just stared at her. For a long, long time. No threat, just stared. Wouldn’t you know it, little smart alec got spooked, disapointed I didn’t say or do something she could throw a fit about, or just realized she wasn’t going to be able to do anything without me seeing and went to stand with Mom.

So guess what? The two boys started chasing each other through the store, screaching and hooting. I went to them and told them to stop, as we had other customers in the store and someone would get hurt. Shockingly, they listned, but the looks on their faces... You could see they have very seldom been told (at least close up) not to do something.

I expected the oldest (11 or 12)to give the ‘just children’ mantra, but he didn’t and we had no more trouble the rest of their visit. I was sure glad to see them go, and do not look forward to the next visit.

I got a million similar stories, but the SNEER on that child’s face...


50 posted on 07/25/2007 7:43:16 AM PDT by Dyslexic Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson