Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WAR IN IRAQ New kind of bomb worries troops
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 22, 2007 | JULIAN E. BARNES

Posted on 06/22/2007 9:58:07 AM PDT by Dubya

BAGHDAD, IRAQ — U.S. soldiers working the streets of the capital fear one Iraqi weapon more than others — copper-plated explosives that can penetrate armor and have proved devastating to Humvees and are even capable of severely damaging tanks.

The power of EFPs, explosively formed penetrators or projectiles, to spray molten metal balls that punch through the armor on vehicles has some American soldiers rethinking their tactics. Some are asking whether the U.S. should give up its reliance on constant improvements to vehicle defenses.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombs; efp; explosives; ied; iraq; oif

1 posted on 06/22/2007 9:58:08 AM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya

These things are not new, they are decades old technology, and we have been talking about them for months here.

http://www.afrlhorizons.com/Briefs/Dec04/MN0407.html


2 posted on 06/22/2007 10:00:49 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Make your armor thicker, and somebody’s going to find a way to punch a hole in it. Welcome to the arms race.

The problem isn’t the tank armor or the EFPs themselves. The problem is where they’re getting them...and that’s Iran.

}:-)4


3 posted on 06/22/2007 10:01:20 AM PDT by Moose4 (Effing the ineffable since 1966.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

The EFPs in Iraq are coming from Iran.


4 posted on 06/22/2007 10:02:36 AM PDT by SIDENET (Inventor of the 12-hour "power nap".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

its..a.iranian..proxy..war


5 posted on 06/22/2007 10:04:05 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Every time a bomb kills one of our troops, a mushroom should sprout in Iran.


6 posted on 06/22/2007 10:06:37 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

I think we should bomb Iran until this problem goes away.....


7 posted on 06/22/2007 10:20:26 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Los Angles Times seem to have journalists that don’t even do their homework, worth a “F” if their articles were submited for the journalist 101 course.


8 posted on 06/22/2007 10:20:32 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
>>>These things are not new, they are decades old technology, and we have been talking about them for months here.<<<

Aren't these EFP's essentially a shaped charge projectile...which is the technology pioneered in the WWII Bazooka?

9 posted on 06/22/2007 10:23:42 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
The LA Times up to it's lies again:

fear one Iraqi weapon more than others — copper-plated explosive

Iraqi!? No those weapons are not homemade camel-dung blasters... they are serial produced in IRAN.

10 posted on 06/22/2007 10:33:38 AM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
Notice that the article states that Iran has supplied the terrorists with the EFPs that are killing U.S. troops.

What ever happened to the War on Terror meaning that we would go to war with those arming and financing the terrorists as George W. Bush originally told us we would do in the War on Terror?

Also why is Al-Sadr like Osama, still alive?

How long does it really take us to identify and eliminate enemies?

Can't win a war being PC, isn't that what we found out in Nam?

11 posted on 06/22/2007 10:37:08 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Because the IEDs are being set off primarily by either trip wire or frequency-emitting cell phones and garage openers, would not it make sense to develop cheap robotic signal generators that can mimic the frequencies and trip the wires ahead of the armor vehicles? Anybody?


12 posted on 06/22/2007 10:37:14 AM PDT by meandog (Bush--proving himself again and again to be the best friend the Dems have EVER had!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
Notice that the article states that Iran has supplied the terrorists with the EFPs that are killing U.S. troops.

What ever happened to the War on Terror meaning that we would go to war with those arming and financing the terrorists as George W. Bush originally told us we would do in the War on Terror?

Also why is Al-Sadr like Osama, still alive?

How long does it really take us to identify and eliminate enemies?

Can't win a war being PC, isn't that what we found out in Nam?

13 posted on 06/22/2007 10:37:17 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged; LibWhacker

I’m sure our intelligence knows where these are being made and the route to get them to Iraq.

Change the ROE and bomb the areas in question.

What could be wrong with stopping this by going to the source?


14 posted on 06/22/2007 10:42:09 AM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Already being done.


15 posted on 06/22/2007 10:44:05 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
You can say that again!

See post #14

16 posted on 06/22/2007 10:44:13 AM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Damn good question that needs to be answered now and the answers have been offered above.
17 posted on 06/22/2007 10:54:24 AM PDT by mcshot ("Some are inert and some are ert" military training truism from Pvt Benjamin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
I agree. We have to stop taking the safe and easy route to war. I know Sherman isn't the most popular guy here, but this quote seems fitting:
"Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in humiliation and disaster." --William Tecumseh Sherman

18 posted on 06/22/2007 10:57:31 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

This discussion should not be taking place.....There’s no way in hell our guys should be exposed to road bombs or anything else in their archaic bag of tricks....


19 posted on 06/22/2007 11:05:21 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Every time a bomb kills one of our troops, a mushroom should sprout in Iran.

Good idea and let's not stop there. Let's nuke also the countries that manufacture the AK47s, RPGs, small arms ammunition etc that kill our troops also.

Hell, drop a nuke or two on the USA also because I'm sure many of the small arms the insurgents use are the ones that were issued to them while in training by our troops.

20 posted on 06/22/2007 11:05:38 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Everyone here knows we are not playing hardball with these bastards...and they know it and use it! Our P.C. pantywaste
politicians are at fault!


21 posted on 06/22/2007 11:09:06 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"If you're going to take Vienna, take Vienna!"
Napoleon Bonaparte
22 posted on 06/22/2007 11:32:53 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
What ever happened to the War on Terror meaning that we would go to war with those arming and financing the terrorists as George W. Bush originally told us we would do in the War on Terror?

A political party won control of Congress based upon a platform of tying his hands - including attempting to make him promise not to attack Iran.

23 posted on 06/22/2007 11:33:37 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: varon

Nah, let’s organize a big circle jerk and do nothing about them.


24 posted on 06/22/2007 12:15:11 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Nah, let’s organize a big circle jerk and do nothing about them.

It seems they've taken your advice :-)

25 posted on 06/22/2007 12:41:27 PM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
Aren't these EFP's essentially a shaped charge projectile...which is the technology pioneered in the WWII Bazooka?

The shaped charge is an application of the "Munroe effect" which was first observed by Charles Edward Munroe in 1888. In essence the principle discovered by Munroe was that curving the surface of a high explosive allowed the shock-wave generated by a subsequent explosion to be focused much like a lens focuses light.

Most shaped charges in practical use are cased in metal since the focused blast wave vaporises the metal into a jet with better penetration then the blast wave alone. As you noted, Bazooka projectiles and RPGs utilize this effect. Another use is the implosion nuclear bomb in which "lenticular" shaped charges are used to compress a sub-critical sphere of Pu239 to a super-critical density, triggering a chain reaction detonation of the nuclear device.

There is a related device which consists of a high explosive charge encased in a rigid tube with one end open. The open end has a solid metal disk centered on the explosive. When the explosive is detonated the blast wave propels the disk outward at hypersonic velocity. The flat disk propels a column of compressed air heated to ten thousand degrees or more ahead of it. The "platter charge" as it is known, allows greater stand-off distances then simple shaped charges and are fairly easy to fabricate. In principle, it is rather like a single shot gun wherein the projectile is a plasma torch.

Regards,
GtG

26 posted on 06/22/2007 12:56:57 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
I think we should bomb Iran until this problem goes away.....

Bingo.

Kinda makes you wonder where President Bush's tough talk against "states that sponsor terrorism" (his post-9/11 speech) went, doesn't it?

27 posted on 06/22/2007 12:59:57 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
I have to wonder if that’s not the plan but it’s taking time to get the resources into the area. We might have learned our lesson in Iraq and know now that it’s not wise to launch a military effort unless and until you’ve considered ALL the possible outcomes and made plans for them. We have an awfully lot of resources in that region now, and apparently more on the way. Perhaps those additional 30,000 or so fighting forces will be doing double duty, taking care of the surge and then be available when the bombing gets underway. The worst mistake we could make would be to start bombing Iran only to have them come up with some response that no one expected.

If nothing else the current administration has probably learned that just because you plan something a certain way, no matter how carefully you plan, doesn’t mean that’s how it’s going to go.

28 posted on 06/22/2007 2:17:30 PM PDT by jwpjr (Sigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
A day or two after marching out of Atlanta, en route to Savannah, one of Sherman's columns encountered a "torpedo," (as landmines of the day were called), which messed up one of WST's subordinate officers.

Sherman provided a contingent of CSA prisoners with shovels and picks, and put them in the lead, clearing the route of march.

Certainly, putting uniformed enemy combatants in such peril would be a violation of current laws of land warfare. AQ and their ilk are not uniformed service members. Certainly, we have enough prisoners for a few chain gangs to clear the road and a wide shoulder along many of the MSRs, and a truck full of prisoners placed at random in each convoy might start making things a bit problematic for the would be bombers...

29 posted on 06/22/2007 2:31:06 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

There’s a solution available here that applies to problems eslewhere:

CLOSE THE DAMN BORDER!!!!!!


30 posted on 06/22/2007 2:36:29 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I love that solution! It would be particularly fitting for AQ since they seem to reject any conceivable law of warfare.


31 posted on 06/22/2007 2:40:47 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Whatever we do, we need to stop worrying about what al-jazeera reports, or the buzz on the "islamic street," and get serious about taking the fight to the enemy.

Sherman also said, "If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war, and not popularity seeking."

Sherman (and Grant) also enjoyed a chief executive who let his generals fight the war (once he found a couple that would take the fight to the enemy) and avoided micromanaging them from Washington.

Having said all that, I really think that our own reconstruction era, moreso than the war itself, holds a lot of lessons we could really learn from and apply in our present situation, yet I've not heard one policy maker, think tank, commentator, law maker etc., make so much as a passing reference, and I fear many of the fundamental mistakes of that era will be repeated.

32 posted on 06/22/2007 3:01:01 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

GtG: Good info. Thanks! You just became my go to guy on
munitions questions.


33 posted on 06/22/2007 5:10:37 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I've not heard one policy maker, think tank, commentator, law maker etc., make so much as a passing reference

The MSM will be all over it. But only after the fact.

God, I do hope Sherman has been reincarnated and has at least a couple of stars on his collar. We'll need him.

34 posted on 06/22/2007 5:55:19 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson