Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA Releases Tape After Woman Says Sippy Cup Caused Airport Raucus
Fox News ^ | June 16, 2007

Posted on 06/16/2007 12:33:12 PM PDT by 3AngelaD

ARLINGTON, Virginia — The Transportation Security Administration is denying allegations that an airport screener seized a toddler's cup and mistreated his mother, taking the unusual step of posting security camera footage on its Web site. At issue is whether Monica Emmerson, a former Secret Service officer, was improperly detained June 11 after she spilled water out of her child's cup at Washington's Reagan National Airport.

TSA has banned most fluids at airport security checkpoints because of concern about possible liquid explosives.

A TSA report said Emmerson told an officer she was a Secret Service agent, flashed her credentials and said she was exempt from the "stupid" policy restricting liquids on planes.

The story spread on the Internet after blogger Bill Adler saw a note Emmerson wrote on a Web site for city parents and interviewed her. He wrote that a TSA screener seized the cup after asking if there was water in it, causing Emmerson's son to cry. Emmerson was told she would have to leave the security checkpoint and dump out the water if she wanted to keep the cup.

As she left the security line, Emmerson "accidentally spilled" the water, she and Adler wrote.

TSA, however, said Emmerson dumped, not spilled, the water on the floor. Emmerson declined to comment.

The video that TSA posted on its Web site shows Emmerson being escorted from the security checkpoint as she appears to take the top off the sippy cup and shake it upside down. It shows that after she was confronted by several officers, she used paper towels fetched by the TSA to clean up the spot.

The TSA said in a statement that the incident and the videotape demonstrate that its "officers display professionalism and concern for all passengers."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; cyapolicy; dca; donutwatch; mythbusters; sippycup; trialbymedia; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last
I thought there was something screwy about the original story. She had to have known about the no-liquids rule because it has been in effect for nearly a year now. Another one who thinks the rules don't apply to her and her child.
1 posted on 06/16/2007 12:33:14 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

And flashing her out-of-date SS credentials was a very stupid thing to do. I too felt that the whole story was weird.


2 posted on 06/16/2007 12:38:17 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Yea just got finished watching the video and incident report on the TSA's websight.

Interesting that the original news omitted that she was a secret service agent. She should have known the rules. She obviously wasn't flying on official business so she shouldn't get special treatment.

Then there is the entire water spilling thing. Splashed on accident my butt. She opened and dumped it on purpose...then shook it to get all the little drops out of it.

I gotta side with TSA on this one. Lady knew exactly what she was doing.

3 posted on 06/16/2007 12:38:33 PM PDT by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
A TSA report said Emmerson told an officer she was a Secret Service agent, flashed her credentials and said she was exempt from the "stupid" policy restricting liquids on planes.

If she is an agent, she should know better, if she is not, she should have been arrested.

4 posted on 06/16/2007 12:39:27 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
I, too, knew this didn't sound exactly right when I first read it!

Are "secret agents" really exempt from "stupid" rules?


5 posted on 06/16/2007 12:42:55 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (With an F, and an R, and an E, and a D, and an F-R-E-D...FRED!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup; Domandred
"Monica Emmerson, a former Secret Service officer..."
6 posted on 06/16/2007 12:43:16 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

Do you have a bigger picture of that squirrel?


7 posted on 06/16/2007 12:44:47 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
TSA has banned most fluids at airport security checkpoints because of concern about possible liquid explosives.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

8 posted on 06/16/2007 12:45:04 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
TSA goons piss me off too.

I haven't flown in four years because they piss me off so much that I know I will make some snide remark that will get me arrested.

The TSA is a useless as t**ts on a boar hog.

The real danger to commercial aircraft is shoulder-fired missiles, and all the high school dropout former welfare recipients in the world rooting through your underwear won't make you one once safer from them.

I hope the airlines all go bankrupt.

9 posted on 06/16/2007 12:49:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (http://www.imwithfred.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Like a lot of others here, I thought there was something missing from the original report. It’s amazing how many Freepers will willing to dump on the TSA without hearing their side of the story. What did you expect from the perp? The whole truth? Not likely.


10 posted on 06/16/2007 12:50:19 PM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer

“Like a lot of others here, I thought there was something missing from the original report. It’s amazing how many Freepers will willing to dump on the TSA without hearing their side of the story. What did you expect from the perp? The whole truth? Not likely.”

TSA is a welfare program disguised as tranportation security.


11 posted on 06/16/2007 12:53:11 PM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

12 posted on 06/16/2007 12:53:55 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

It seemed odd that they made her clean it up. But if she dumped it on the floor on purpose, it only makes sense. Spilled water on the floor might seem harmless, but if somebody slipped and fell, there would be a major lawsuit.

That’s why you have all those little yellow signs all over the place warning you that someone has been mopping the floor. Lawyers.


13 posted on 06/16/2007 12:54:34 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don’t punish the airlines for government stupidity.


14 posted on 06/16/2007 12:55:35 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You guys should read all the numerous thread on the Travel/Security section of www.flyertalk.com .

Some of the run ins posted there about “airport security”
will have you shaking your head in disbelief.

A common complain is something on the order of,
“they confiscated my 4 ounce bottle of mouthwash,
yet all the cargo on the plane is unscreened.”

I’ve seen some amazing stuff posted in the 5 years that I’ve been a member of that website.


15 posted on 06/16/2007 12:56:35 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Forget the fence....Build a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Another one who thinks the rules don't apply to her and her child.

Yes because we know the rules are to keep us 'safe'. Oh wait a minute, we're talking about the federal government. Those rules are to justify the existence of highly paid buffoons to harass private citizens so it looks like they're keeping us safe.

You don't actually believe those bobbleheads are useful do you?

16 posted on 06/16/2007 12:57:57 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds like those t**ts on a boar hog has got you logging lots of miles on your car. Perhaps you don’t go anywhere anymore.


17 posted on 06/16/2007 12:58:46 PM PDT by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
"Monica Emmerson, a former Secret Service officer..."

Ooops.. breezed right over that.

18 posted on 06/16/2007 12:59:40 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

Seems like they could have charged her for impersonating a federal officer or something.


19 posted on 06/16/2007 1:07:05 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Here's the TSA report from the same website as the video...

On June 11,2007 at approx. 13:45 TSO [REDACTED] responded to a CIC check on lane four at center pier checkpoint. A female passenger traveling with a child in a stroller had entered the checkpoint with a 16 ounce bottle of Deer Park water and a plastic children's drink cup with approx. 6 to 8 ounces of fluid inside. TSO [REDACTED] a s k e d the female if the children's cup had formula or juice in it and she stated no. TSO [REDACTED] g a v e the female her options of placing the 16 oz. Deer Park water in her check baggage or have TSA dispose of the bottle and he informed the passenger that the child's container was too big and would have to be poured out. TSO [REDACTED] stated the female passenger became upset and stated she was an officer and flashed her Secret Service badge and credentials and said that she should be exempt from all this and this was a stupid policy and this whole thing was [REDACTED] .

TSO [REDACTED] took the female to the exit lane with the stroller and her bag. When she got past the exit lane podium she opened the child's drink container and held her arm out and poured the contents (approx. 6 to 8 ounces) on the floor. MWAA Officer [REDACTED] was manning the exit lane at the time and observed the entire scene and approached the female passenger after observing this and stopped her when she tried to re-enter the sterile area after trying come back through after spilling the fluids on the floor.The female passenger again flashed her badge and credentials and told the MWAA officer "Do you know who I am?' An argument then ensued between the officer and the passenger over whether the spilling of the fluid was intentional or accidental. Officer [REDACTED] asked the passenger to clean up the spill and she did. The female passenger then requested to speak to officer [REDACTED] supervisor and several MWAA officers responded including a MWAA Major. After a short discussion between MWAA and the passenger she was cleared to re-enter the screening checkpoint which she did by going through lane five and after re-submitting her bag and articles for x-ray screening she proceeded to her gate.

TSA site

20 posted on 06/16/2007 1:07:25 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Yes'm!


21 posted on 06/16/2007 1:08:45 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (With an F, and an R, and an E, and a D, and an F-R-E-D...FRED!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“those little yellow signs”
The ones that say “Piso Mojado”????????


22 posted on 06/16/2007 1:22:33 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Bottom line? This Emmerson lady is a two-bit LIAR!


23 posted on 06/16/2007 1:29:41 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

What about an ignorant law?

24 posted on 06/16/2007 1:31:14 PM PDT by RagingBull (Talent does what it can; genius does what it must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RagingBull
What about an ignorant law?

There's no excuse....

25 posted on 06/16/2007 1:33:35 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Sounds like another case of the dreaded "Don't you know who I am?!?" disease. ;)

I've always been polite to TSA screeners, and they've never failed to be polite to me in return. People who think the rules don't apply to them, "constitutionalists" who are spoiling for a fight, and cranks who berate eveyone they come into contact with are going to bring problems upon themselves. The security line isn't the place to argue the appropriateness of the policies.

26 posted on 06/16/2007 1:34:13 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Same here. I used to work for one. They treat their employees like garbage. And sadly that tends to be reflected in how they treat their customers.


27 posted on 06/16/2007 1:35:27 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

FYI, never fly Continental Airlines. Heck a friend of mine just got bumped off a flight this morning because the idiots working the ticket counters don’t know the new homeland security rules regardng temp passports.


28 posted on 06/16/2007 1:36:49 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: billbears

That may well be, but so what? You thinking the rules are stupid and the buffoons are too highly paid doesn’t change what happened, and doesn’t change the circumstances at the airport. And you certainly do not waive your id around like it is a magic pass through airport security. All she did was hold up everybody else in the line and inconvience dozens of people, probably arranging for some to miss their plane. Not exactly the right time or place to indulge in a little civil disobedience in defiance of TSA. She is an adult and should have figured that out. Another one who thinks the rules don’t apply to her and her child.


29 posted on 06/16/2007 1:38:15 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I see she used the mantra of the liberal democrat:

“Do you know who I am?”


30 posted on 06/16/2007 1:39:28 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
Why not? They should be fighting these idiotic rules, instead of going along with them.

The no-liquids rule is absolutely idiotic.

We know who is trying to do us harm. Why not start looking for them, instead of harassing everyone?

31 posted on 06/16/2007 1:39:49 PM PDT by B Knotts (Anybody but Giuliani!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

The TSA guys did have some fun with her, though. After she initially cleaned it up, she apparently asked to speak to a supervisor- who made her clean it up again! Meanwhile, about ten million people walked over the wet area before the one guard kinda, somewhat, blocked it off. It was funny, though.


32 posted on 06/16/2007 1:40:10 PM PDT by jimboster (fROM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I have had the same kind of experiences, and I have to fly a lot. They have always been pleasant and polite to me, even on the very day last summer when the no-liquid rule went into effect. I was coming back from Hawaii and had to sacrifice my favorite lip gloss on the altar of airport security. The man and the woman inspectors both apologized profusely. Generally if you are nice and respectful to people, they will return the favor. But if you go around with a huge chip on your shoulder looking to be offended, you will encounter what you are looking for.


33 posted on 06/16/2007 1:43:55 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Who in the hell hired this wacko at Secret Service????????Did she have the same psyche screening as our illustrious former female astronaut/diaper model?????


34 posted on 06/16/2007 1:45:37 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer

“Willing to dump on the TSA” because of our own experiences with them. Besides, I am always skeptical of those in authority. I’m not quite sure what these videos are supposed to prove. I viewed them and they seemed pretty inconclusive to me. There is no sound, so no ability to hear what anybody is saying or the level of the dialogue.

I’ll continue to give Ms. Emmerson the benefit of the doubt.


35 posted on 06/16/2007 1:46:05 PM PDT by Emo4SC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Emo4SC

Yeah! Let people dump water on the floor. What do we care.


36 posted on 06/16/2007 1:54:09 PM PDT by donna (They hand off my culture & citizenship to criminals & then call me racist for objecting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Not exactly the right time or place to indulge in a little civil disobedience in defiance of TSA.

So tell us. When is the right time for civil disobedience? When would be acceptable to you? Civil disobedience most often happens when you're fed up to the gills with the nonsense, not when it's most convenient for those who won't stand up no matter what.

37 posted on 06/16/2007 1:56:06 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
There is a multi-tiered approach to policing in this country. On the lowest level are folks like us, who abide by the law and submit to whatever indignities the authorities prescribe. On the next level up is the friends and family of the connected, who get all sorts of get-out-of-jail cards and get a warning where you get the ticket. The next level up is occupied by law enforcement officers of all stripes, who can count on professional courtesy to get them out of almost any scrape they might find themselves in. At the very top-most rung are our elected servants, who grant themselves every privilege and clearance to avoid the very laws they write for the rest of us.

This is just flat-out wrong. The law must apply to all equally. If our betters do not have to abide by the law, they will have no appreciation for what it takes to abide by the law. Furthermore, there will come a time when the long suffering people will not accept this unequal treatment any longer.

This woman, as a badge-flashing former Secret Service Agent, obviously felt that her privilege was not being respected. While I sympathize with her annoyance at the petty stupidities inflicted on the traveling public by the TSA, I loathe her assumption that they may apply to me but not to her.

38 posted on 06/16/2007 1:59:29 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity. But is stupidity sufficient?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Maybe when there are not 50 people behind you in the security line trying to get on a plane, some not wanting to miss their mother’s funeral. Maybe when you are not traveling with a toddler. Maybe when you are not in the wrong.


39 posted on 06/16/2007 2:02:57 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I watched the tape, the child had the cup in his hand. I went over that tape several times and did not see a deliberate spill. She was chased by a TSA woman initially and then several more came over. Long time talking. She had to take child out of stroller. Child took off down the corridor. One of the TSA men then held the child for her and she went and mopped up spill. Later roll of paper towels came and she mopped up floor.
The woman was offended by the hassle by TSA. The rule about 3 ounces seems silly and she wanted to get through. She seemed to have tried to shortcut the incident by showing ID that she was a safe person and should not have to obey the silly rule.TSA seemed professional but no sound. They just kept her there for 40 minutes and she missed her flight.


40 posted on 06/16/2007 2:03:08 PM PDT by fernwood (those who sacrifice freedom for safety, get neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
The female passenger again flashed her badge and credentials and told the MWAA officer "Do you know who I am?'

Seeing red, here...

She forgot to say "My taxes pay your salary!" That one works every time...

41 posted on 06/16/2007 2:03:20 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity. But is stupidity sufficient?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
"Monica Emmerson, a former Secret Service officer..."

Why does she still have credentials? I would think this would be a serious security issue the Secret Service needs to look into, especially if you have people that can try to exert some influence, using old credentials?

42 posted on 06/16/2007 2:03:44 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
I gotta side with TSA on this one. Lady knew exactly what she was doing.

Whatcha wanna bet Monica Emmerson is true blue liberal Democrat?

43 posted on 06/16/2007 2:06:52 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Why does she still have credentials?

Good point. Government agencies usually make an employee perform an employement termination form, which includes a line where each ID, building pass and credential is accounted for as returned, and signed off by the appropriate offfice.

Of course, a lot of people certify that they "lost" their credentials and take them with them. That fraudulent certification surely carries a heavy penalty, all by itself. Then the subsequent fraudulent use of the credentials only compounds the offense.

This woman could be in a heap o' trouble...

44 posted on 06/16/2007 2:10:36 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity. But is stupidity sufficient?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
"Airport Raucus"???

Get with the program, Fox. This is the kind of copyediting we expect from the drones at the alphabets. The word is "ruckus" -- regardless of how raucous this incident was or wasn't.

Ditto for "reign in" (it's "rein in," from the horsey world), "duel citizenship" (two is "dual," although it might yet come to dueling), and "boarder" (unless you're talking about pirates, or someone who lives in your house by mutual arrangement instead of skipping blithely over that non-existent line in the desert that we used to call the "border").

45 posted on 06/16/2007 2:21:54 PM PDT by Tenniel2 (If illegals voted Republican, there'd be a radioactive wall from San Ysidro to Port Isabel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Maybe when there are not 50 people behind you in the security line trying to get on a plane, some not wanting to miss their mother’s funeral. Maybe when you are not traveling with a toddler. Maybe when you are not in the wrong.

I see. So civil disobedience is acceptable as long as you aren't put out. Gotcha.

Just glad so many that stood up for basic freedoms throughout history didn't take that into concern before doing it. Course today it seems good 'conservatives' would want them rounded up and tossed into the pokey for inconveniencing them....

46 posted on 06/16/2007 2:27:00 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fernwood

The deliberate spill starts at 2:00:59 on the tape. The TSA escorted her out but after dumping the water and trying to enter the secure area the wrong way, a female cop stopped her. The TSA guy left her with the cop. Everyone around her from then on were cops.


47 posted on 06/16/2007 2:30:53 PM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
TSA Video
48 posted on 06/16/2007 2:34:08 PM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Good thing she didn't act up in a Middle East airport...
49 posted on 06/16/2007 2:40:17 PM PDT by mikrofon (All Your Bags Are Belong to Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Good thing Libby wasn’t standing behind her in line.


50 posted on 06/16/2007 2:41:40 PM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson