To: John Cena
Good. This case was nothing more that people worshiping the law, regardless of what it says. Putting a 17 year old honor student in prison for 10 years for oral sex is stupid.
2 posted on
06/11/2007 11:07:09 AM PDT by
burzum
(None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
To: burzum
Not only that, but our esteemed (not) former president says oral sex doesn’t count.
6 posted on
06/11/2007 11:08:19 AM PDT by
paddles
To: burzum
And if he’d been 18 then he should’ve been prosecuted? What if she was 14 and he was 17?
The law does not distinuish between the minor who is 18 and drunk and the minor who is 20years and 11months and drunk. Both are in violation of the law.
7 posted on
06/11/2007 11:09:06 AM PDT by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: burzum
What it amounts to is paternalism ~ thinking that young black men are unable to control themselves when made sexual offers by young women.
Honor student or not the guy proved he's an idiot.
8 posted on
06/11/2007 11:09:28 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: burzum
Thank God-this case was an embarressment to me as a Georgian. It probably was racist; I fail to see how such a verdict could have been rendered otherwise.
27 posted on
06/11/2007 11:23:45 AM PDT by
nyconse
To: burzum
There is no “honor” in raping a 15 year old girl —even though it was consensual, it was statutory rape.
To: burzum
Agreed. This is a judge who understands justice.
45 posted on
06/11/2007 11:43:24 AM PDT by
Silly
(http://www.paulklenk.us)
To: burzum
This case was nothing more that people worshiping the law, regardless of what it says... It's what we call the rule of law, combined with divided powers. We used to teach it in the schools...
62 posted on
06/11/2007 11:51:51 AM PDT by
gogeo
(Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
To: burzum
Good. This case was nothing more that people worshiping the law, regardless of what it says. Putting a 17 year old honor student in prison for 10 years for oral sex is stupid. I agree.
101 posted on
06/11/2007 12:16:21 PM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.)
To: burzum
How did he beat the rap on raping that drugged, unconscious 17 year old girl?
This guy would appear to be a serial rapist.
To: burzum
Putting a 17 year old honor student in prison for 10 years for oral sex is stupid.After all, he could be the next Bill Clinton.
289 posted on
06/11/2007 6:47:20 PM PDT by
reg45
To: burzum
The common law principle of abatement was upheld in this case. It’s not surprising the Democrat AG wants to overrule common law.
303 posted on
06/11/2007 8:02:25 PM PDT by
Pencil
To: burzum
This whole case was absurd. Sending a 17 year old away for ten years for a consensual act with a 15 year old is idiotic. What a waste or resources to try this case and lock the kid up. Having made the kid spend time in jail around hard core criminals for nothing also makes him more likely to become a real criminal himself.
To: burzum
Good. This case was nothing more that people worshiping the law, regardless of what it says. Putting a 17 year old honor student in prison for 10 years for oral sex is stupid. I agree. I remember seeing the story on this young man and the case when he was first sentenced to prison. He never should have gone to prison.
326 posted on
06/11/2007 10:00:55 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson