Skip to comments.
A Two-Time Universe? Physicist Explores How Second Dimension of Time Could Unify Physics Laws
PhysOrg.com | USC College ^
| 5/17/07
| Tom Siegfried
Posted on 05/16/2007 1:43:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: LibWhacker
My mistake... Date published was 5/15, not 5/17.
To: LibWhacker
With two times, Bars believes, many of the mysteries of today’s laws of physics may disappear. There are a lot of two-timer mysteries in bars...........
3
posted on
05/16/2007 1:46:36 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
To: LibWhacker
If you have multiple dimensions of time it would be nearly impossible to prove whether events are synchronous, which would really screw up the meaning of the word "is".
4
posted on
05/16/2007 1:50:03 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
To: LibWhacker
Ah, but in which time dimension?
To: LibWhacker
mistake... Date published was 5/15, not 5/17.Sometimes the effects of that second dimension of time arn't so small. ;)
6
posted on
05/16/2007 1:50:32 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: LibWhacker
My mistake... Date published was 5/15, not 5/17. Does that mean this article has two published times?
7
posted on
05/16/2007 1:51:40 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO COMPROMISE YOUR PRINCIPLES ANYWAY... WHY WAIT?)
To: NonValueAdded; anymouse; pgyanke
To: LibWhacker
There’s how long men perceive time to elapse, and how long women perceive it to elapse. Totally completely different, like they’re on different dimensions!!
9
posted on
05/16/2007 1:55:01 PM PDT
by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: LibWhacker
10
posted on
05/16/2007 1:58:17 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: LibWhacker
No officer, I didn’t do that, or if I did it was in the other time dimension . . .
To: LibWhacker
This is somewhat old ground. One problem with yet another time dimension is that causality would be gone. While time is an illusion anyway, planar time would not add much when there are 26 dimensions to begin with, some timelike, some spacelike and none actually either.
12
posted on
05/16/2007 1:59:58 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: LibWhacker
My mistake... Date published was 5/15, not 5/17. Hmmmmm
13
posted on
05/16/2007 2:02:22 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
(A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)
To: LibWhacker
A Two-Time Universe? I sense a Country and Western song coming on...
14
posted on
05/16/2007 2:03:30 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
To: RightWhale
While time is an illusion anyway, planar time would not add much when there are 26 dimensions to begin with, some timelike, some spacelike and none actually either. I'd love to see the mathematical proof of that claim -- particularly if I could understand it (which I probably couldn't)!
To: LibWhacker
Bars’ math suggests that the familiar world of four dimensions — three of space, one of time — is merely a shadow of a richer six-dimensional reality. In this view the ordinary world is like a two-dimensional wall displaying shadows of the objects in a three-dimensional room.
Socrates and his cave analogy was way ahead of its time.
16
posted on
05/16/2007 2:07:36 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: LibWhacker
The second dimension of time.....is where the demons live. MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
17
posted on
05/16/2007 2:11:54 PM PDT
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: LibWhacker
the Darwinists keep coming up with outlandish ideas to try to explain their sham theory.
18
posted on
05/16/2007 2:12:17 PM PDT
by
balch3
To: coloradan
Yes, men and women are from different space-times that overlap. There is ‘manspace-time’ and ‘womanspace-time.’ I think Bars is onto something here!
19
posted on
05/16/2007 2:12:18 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: LibWhacker
You know, we mathematicians have got to learn to promise crap we can’t deliver.
Physicists and biologists have been doing it for decades.
20
posted on
05/16/2007 2:13:36 PM PDT
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson