Posted on 05/15/2007 3:44:53 AM PDT by Hazcat
I don't believe for one second you're truly interested, but here's THOMPSON'S FLOOR SPEECH ON CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM March 27, 2001
I’m sure Mr Thompson will handle the situation easily.
Michael Moore should be debating behind bars.
One could could only "dignify" Moore by turning a firehose on him to "bathe" him!
Not Moore—America already *knows* he is the weakest link and the biggest loser!!! BUT this would give FRED a lot of publicity that would make all the other candidates green with envy—FRED doesn’t even have to respond. He should just ignore the anti-American one and we can watch Moore have a national meltdown when that happens! LOL! :-)
I’m going to Costco to get bulk quantities of popcorn, anyone else need some? ;-)
When did he get that, like in 6th grade?! Bwahahahaha!
“Attack”? A one or two paragraph commentary?
You think with all that fat MM would have much thicker skin...
Well, if he was 17 in the 6th grade.
(Which could actually be the case with Moore.)
Good question. Apparently he was born in April 1954.
The "71-72" statement makes me think it was a school thing.
So he would have turned 18 in April '72.
I don't know how many times he went thru 6th grade, but it's possible.
From the Altadis USA Web site, Montecristo's parent company (emphasis mine):
"The world's most famous cigar trademark. Originating in Cuba, our Montecristo, now distributed in the U.S., is manufactured by hand in the Dominican Republic. Considered one of the finest cigars on the market, the Montecristo is blended for the true connoisseur. It is a medium to full bodied cigar with a sweet aroma and impeccable construction."
So it proves yet again that Mr. Moore is willing to distort the truth to slander people.
I was JUST making comment on ‘toon... not Fred. Sorry, should have made that clear.
LLS
He’s NOT Rudy.
He’s NOT Mitt.
He’s NOT John.
He’s NOT Tommy.
He’s NOT Ron.
I could go on and on, but I’ve got to get my kid ready for school. :-)
Sounds like another “Rooty Tooter” with their panties in a bunch
More Moore blowing smoke!
As to my HTML skills...no need to be envious. It's fairly simple to learn. Visit The HTML Sandbox.
Moore would be percieved as the winner because he would use a lot of fallacious arguments that are almost impossible to defend against. In a regulated debate that wouldn't be allowed but this would be some sort of TV debate where anything goes.
Remember during the 2004 convention when Moore wiped the floor with Bill O'Reily? Now O'Reily isn't a very bright guy or a quick thinker and Moore cheated by using fallacious arguments but still, to the unbiased viewer Moore came across better.
Thompson has absolutely nothing to gain from this win or lose and Moore has everything to gain.
Won’t Fred have to talk between bars while Moore serves his term in jail?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.