Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats seek another Patriot Act change
The Hill ^ | 11 May 2007 | Susan Crabtree

Posted on 05/12/2007 5:59:09 PM PDT by BGHater

A group of Democratic senators plans to introduce legislation reversing a new law allowing U.S. attorneys to live outside the districts they are appointed to serve.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Charles Schumer (N.Y.), Max Baucus (Mont.) and Jon Tester (Mont.) plan to drop a bill Monday that will undo a provision inserted into last year’s Patriot Act reauthorization. That language, included at the Department of Justice’s request, allows U.S. attorneys to live outside their districts if the attorney general gives them dual or additional responsibilities.

The senators’ planned bill would require that U.S. attorneys reside in the district they are appointed to serve, and assistant U.S. attorneys to live in the district or within 25 miles of it.

This is the second change to last year’s Patriot Act that Democrats have initiated as a result of the findings of an investigation into the Justice Department’s firing of eight U.S. attorneys. Democrats have also opposed a provision that would allow the attorney general to appoint an interim U.S. attorney when an opening occurs and allow that prosecutor to serve indefinitely — thereby effectively circumventing the Senate confirmation process.

In March, the Senate voted to return to the original law allowing interim appointments by the attorney general for only 120 days, and then allowing district courts to appoint interim U.S. attorneys if a permanent replacement has not been nominated and confirmed.

Democrats were outraged when they discovered that the residency provision was inserted into the Patriot Act to allow U.S. Attorney Bill Mercer to live in Washington, D.C., and continue to serve as both principal associate deputy attorney general and U.S. attorney for Montana. He is now acting associate attorney general, the No. 3 position at the DoJ.

“U.S. Attorneys cannot do their jobs adequately from Washington, D.C. The position requires a huge commitment, and each district deserves a highly-qualified U.S. Attorney focused on the needs of the local area and fighting crime and terrorism in their state,” Feinstein said in a statement. “U.S. Attorneys serve the residents of their district. They should not be allowed to work full-time in Washington while holding a U.S. Attorney position.”

According to Feinstein, several federal prosecutors besides Mercer currently serve full-time positions in Washington while retaining their jobs in their home states. Those U.S. attorneys include:

- Michael J. Sullivan of Boston, who has been serving as the acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Washington for the past six months.

- Mary Beth Buchanan of Pittsburgh, the acting director of the Office of Violence Against Women, who prior to that had served as director of the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys.

- Kevin O’Connor of Connecticut, an associate deputy attorney general coordinating anti-gang policies.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: attorneys; district; justicedepartment; patriotact

1 posted on 05/12/2007 5:59:14 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

They need to introduce a bill that would send all lawyers to the gallows. That would be a refreshing change.


2 posted on 05/12/2007 6:02:24 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Schumer is trying to get HS “deleted” or broken up - mostly because as a “new agency” they don’t have enough moles inside to control it and really f* it up. There is little doubt what they’re “up to...”
3 posted on 05/12/2007 6:31:42 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Why don't they just pass legislation making Congress the appointer of US Attorneys?

Well, actually - the DEMOCRAT portion of Congress, whether they're in the majority or minority.

Unless a Democrat president is elected, in which case it would be OK for the executive branch to handle the burden for a while...

4 posted on 05/12/2007 6:42:01 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Gun Control, the Sequel: More and Morerer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Yeah! lets tell the terrorists that we have them under our watchful eye and we will be coming down on them soon. Sounds like a good liberal idea to me!


5 posted on 05/12/2007 6:45:20 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (ID RATHER BE HUNTING WITH DICK THAN DRIVING WITH TED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson