Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton targets 'Big Oil' [demands probe into recent maintenance closures of US refineries]
AFP via Japan Today ^ | May 9, 2007 | NA

Posted on 05/09/2007 4:22:15 PM PDT by jdm

WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton Wednesday demanded a probe into recent maintenance closures of several U.S. refineries, and questioned whether oil firms were guilty of price gouging.

As anger mounts in the Congress over hikes in gasoline prices ahead of the key summer holiday season, the New York senator argued oil firms should not pass the cost of temporary shortages onto motorists.

"Consumers simply cannot continue to absorb the crippling cost of these rising gas prices," Clinton said.

"I am very concerned that oil companies are not being held responsible for their own infrastructure and are being allowed to pass shortages onto customers at the pump."

Clinton said that oil companies should be forced to use some of their windfall profits to cushion price hikes and asked the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to mount an investigation.

Democratic Senate Majority leader Harry Reid hit out at high prices and huge oil firms. "Every year, about this time, a refinery goes down for repairs. Is that coincidental?" he asked.

"Or is it part of a plan that these multinational, huge companies who are making obscene profits in the tens of billions of dollars — is this part of their game to keep the profits going."

On Tuesday, Democrats in the House of Representatives accused President George W Bush of presiding over a rise in gas prices over the course of his presidency.

When he took power in 2001, the average price of a gallon of petrol in the United States was $1.47, while today it had average 3.05 dollars, and was much higher in some areas, they said.

But Republicans have accused Democrats of doing little to ease the pain at the pump since taking control of the Congress earlier this year.

"Despite their promises, House Democrats have done nothing to address high energy costs this year — and history shows they have consistently opposed common sense energy solutions," a statement from the office of Republican Majority leader John Boehner said.

Gas prices in the United States are among the lowest of any industrialized nation, and its roads are awash with large, gas-guzzling cars.

But rising concern over greenhouse gases and global warming, and wallet pounding prices at the petrol pump have prompted rising concern about heavy petrol consumption.

On Monday, another Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama castigated U.S. automakers for their crusade to build faster and bigger cars, and unveiled a plan to encourage the development of more fuel-efficient cars.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; environmentalist; hillary; oil

1 posted on 05/09/2007 4:22:18 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm

Hillary demands assistance in ridding Bills shirts of Ring Around His Collars.


2 posted on 05/09/2007 4:25:18 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

3 posted on 05/09/2007 4:26:15 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

More grandstanding. Refineries ALWAYS need at least a partial annual shutdown for repairs and refitting.

What is the best time to do that? When the weather is good.

If they didn’t have maintenance shutdowns there would be a lot more catastrophic failures and then Hitlery would b!tch about that, too.


4 posted on 05/09/2007 4:28:06 PM PDT by 43north (7 of 11 living things are insects. This explains liberals and islamofascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

“Consumers simply cannot continue to absorb the crippling cost of these rising gas prices,” Clinton said.

“I am very concerned that oil companies are not being held responsible for their own infrastructure and are being allowed to pass shortages onto customers at the pump.”

Clinton said that oil companies should be forced to use some of their windfall profits to cushion price hikes and asked the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to mount an investigation


Does Hillary understand free enterprise economics?

Does Hillary understand that the “windfall profits” are largely paid out in dividends to investors, so there is not a windfall sitting in a bank somewhere for oil companies to subsidize the prices in the future?

Does Hillary understand how the economy works? She would have to impose major controls on the oil industry to change the way prices are set.


5 posted on 05/09/2007 4:29:15 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
When is someone going to “target the Dimms” for refusing to build one new refinery in 20+ years??
6 posted on 05/09/2007 4:30:44 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

I guess the pols should ask this question:

WHat would pi$$ off more people?

Gas at $3/gal anytime you want

or

Gas at $2/gal but signs at (most all of) the pumps say “out of gas”?

Been there, done that - I’ll pay the bit extra, thank you.


7 posted on 05/09/2007 4:31:48 PM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Which costs more - the price spike due to limited shortages or the various gas taxes?

Hmmmm . . .


8 posted on 05/09/2007 4:33:56 PM PDT by sig226 (Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Here’s the rare thing I agree with her on.

These maintenance shut downs should occur in October.


9 posted on 05/09/2007 4:34:45 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs ("First I think of a man, then I take away reason and accountability.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"Does Hillary understand free enterprise economics?"

Ask her about Cattle Futures... it's amazing how much she knows from just "reading the Wall Street Journal."

Hillary, in my opinion, is saying what went over well in the polls. People are angry about gas prices, she blames big oil. I notice she says nothing about the Eco-terrorists/tree huggers/dirt worshiping types who have passed laws that make new refineries just about impossible.

10 posted on 05/09/2007 4:36:12 PM PDT by Volunteer (Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Hillary should pull a Chavez on Big Oil. Problem solved.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 05/09/2007 4:38:09 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
"I am very concerned that oil companies are not being held responsible for their own infrastructure and are being allowed to pass shortages onto customers at the pump."

That one rates right up there with
"I can't be responsible for every under capitalized business in America"

And I'm thinking, Dammit woman, pick up an econ book every once and a while.

12 posted on 05/09/2007 4:38:34 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Have you seen the pice of hookers lately? Hillary needs to hold hearings on Big Ass.


13 posted on 05/09/2007 4:38:35 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
These maintenance shut downs should occur in October.

So how would you like to have your vacation time limited to October? Chances are, 'Big Oil' is also considering their own employees vacation requsts and staffing needs in contemplating the outages.

If the employees wish to take a summer vacation so they can take their children with them, then why not shutter the plant while the contractors perform the maintenance work?

14 posted on 05/09/2007 4:38:56 PM PDT by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
CORRECTION:

Have you seen the price of hookers lately? Hillary needs to hold hearings on Big Ass.

15 posted on 05/09/2007 4:39:08 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Exactly. But the MSM will not ask her why the Government makes more off a gallon of gas than the oil companies or the gas station does.


16 posted on 05/09/2007 4:43:18 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
These maintenance shut downs should occur in October

Well that would work out well for the northerners filling their oil tanks for the winter!

Actually, I think the 'maintenance' shutdowns every April-May are for the refineries to switch their processing to make the EPA required summer formulation gas. When they are up and running for the required selling date (used to be June 15th, but I think it's earlier now), the prices level off. Come August, they start doing 'maintenance' shutdowns to return to normal gasoline, which is allowed again in September. It's the federal government driving the seasonal supply shortages, not the refiners on their own.

17 posted on 05/09/2007 4:44:06 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Pure demagoguery from a grandstanding POS.  How about some hearings into why oil companies aren't being allowed to built refineries?
18 posted on 05/09/2007 4:46:33 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Big oil....big insurance, big pharma, wal-mart, big banks are all bad...the only big thing they like is big government and big unions.


19 posted on 05/09/2007 4:46:34 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Spring and Fall are the best times for repairs. Refineries and Power companies can't shut down during the peak summer or winter season. So valve repair services tend to be busiest in the Spring and Fall.

Not any business of politicians anyway.

20 posted on 05/09/2007 4:49:00 PM PDT by kcar (Victory is the best exit strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Image hosted by Photobucket.comin her infinite wisdom and logistical acumen, would the Beast rather they shut down in the middle of summer and the middle of winter to do PM etc, or in the spring and fall when they are switching from heating fuel to gas or gas to heating fuel to do it???
21 posted on 05/09/2007 4:53:42 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13

“If the employees wish to take a summer vacation so they can take their children with them, then why not shutter the plant while the contractors perform the maintenance work?”

Because it drives the price of gas to $4/gallon, wrecks consumer spending, and spikes inflation.

Haven’t you ever worked for a company that has a season where vacations are pretty much off limits during that time of year?

Why don’t we just shut the crabbing fleet down, for example. Never mind that crabbing season can be measured in weeks - some employees might want to take their kids to see the largest ball of twine or something.


22 posted on 05/09/2007 4:53:58 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Ignorance should be painful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Let’s see. The democrats don’t want us to drill in ANWAR. They don’t want us to drill off the Atlantic or Pacific Coast. Our refineries are running at 95% capacity and yet the environmentalists (democrats one and all) block new refineries with impact studies, high costs and lengthy bureaucracy. Democrats don’t want nuclear power. Every State has a different blend(s) which is being changed over at this time. Demand is up in the Spring and Summer (market forces). Fuel oil production is being phased out and refineries are converting to produce gasoline (which at 95% capacity subtracts from the ability to meet demand). Our refineries are old and held together with wires and tape so little surprise when a refinery hiccups. And who is responsible for our shortfall? Democrats, one and all.


23 posted on 05/09/2007 4:54:28 PM PDT by gesully (gesully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Hillary should pull a Chavez on Big Oil. Problem solved.

If she is elected President she will!

24 posted on 05/09/2007 4:59:38 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Hillary and Harry Reid could do away with the need for “summer blend” gasoline, and thus, scheduled maintenance closures. I’m sure that GWB would sign such a bill from the Democratic Congress.

Why are the Dems in favor of higher gas prices?


25 posted on 05/09/2007 5:01:28 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

Hillary should demand an investigation into the Vince Foster murder. Now, there would be a story.


26 posted on 05/09/2007 5:18:18 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

She sounds more like Hugo Chavez every day.


27 posted on 05/09/2007 5:21:47 PM PDT by hardworking (The biggest problem we have is the lack of term limits in the U.S. Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Why doesn’t Hillary investigate the “excessive” windfall of taxes the government is stealing from us.


28 posted on 05/09/2007 5:22:31 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdm
"Consumers simply cannot continue to absorb the crippling cost of these rising gas prices," Clinton said.

No prob, lady. Get off your large posterior and write some legislation to fast track 10-20 refineries, off shore drilling, oil shale research, etc.

There's plenty that can be done. Quit yer bitching and get to work!

29 posted on 05/09/2007 5:46:26 PM PDT by upchuck (Who will support Fred Thompson? Anyone who enjoys a dose of common sense not wrapped in doublespeak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

“Democratic Senate Majority leader Harry Reid hit out at high prices and huge oil firms. “Every year, about this time, a refinery goes down for repairs. Is that coincidental?” he asked. “

Road apples. The refineries go down to convert to the STUPID, GOVERNMENT MANDATED odd ball fuel mixtures. Harry, you are an ass.


30 posted on 05/09/2007 5:47:33 PM PDT by dbacks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"Does Hillary understand free enterprise economics? Does Hillary understand that the “windfall profits” are largely paid out in dividends to investors, so there is not a windfall sitting in a bank somewhere for oil companies to subsidize the prices in the future? Does Hillary understand how the economy works? She would have to impose major controls on the oil industry to change the way prices are set."

Uh...no. She's a socialist/communist.

31 posted on 05/09/2007 6:27:26 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

A candidate who cannot understand basic economics has no business attempting to become President of the United States. Zimbabwe could do with another President perhaps Ms Hillary would like to apply for that job.


32 posted on 05/09/2007 6:34:20 PM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm
...the New York senator argued oil firms should not pass the cost of temporary shortages onto motorists...

But, she believes it's perfectly fine for the cost of idiotic government policies and regulations to be passed on to motorists.

33 posted on 05/09/2007 6:34:36 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

ROFL!


34 posted on 05/09/2007 6:36:19 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
These maintenance shut downs should occur in October.

Which ones? and why October?

Or are you being sarcastic?

35 posted on 05/09/2007 6:40:22 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm; All
A few comments on "shut downs" at refineries from somone in the business:

First, they are called turn-a-rounds or overhauls.

Second, there are at least two types: 'major overhauls' and minor overhauls (a third type would be an emergency turn-a-round)

Let's look at them individually:

Major turn-a-round -- These are usually refinery wide, especially in medium to large refineries. They are scheduled years in advance. During such a turn-a-round they may be: installing more modern equipment, working through a long planned debottlenecking program, o verhauling major equipment (pumps, compressors, etc.). They are planned to the T, with contracts pre awarded to dozens of companies to come in and work in their areas of specific expertize. They are also planned so as to be quick and efficient, as down time is lost revenue time.

Minor turn-a-round -- similar to above but usually limited to one or two units within a refinery. A major refinery may have 4-7 Units (I am not a process guy so I may be off here). The turn-a-round may be for reasons similar to above or may be for more routine maintenance. For example, the loss of one unit during a turn-a-round may mean that refinery cannot produce Diesel, or jet fuel or a few other specific products. But they will still have revenue. They are also schedule 12-18 months in advance and are rotated between the units.

Limitations on turn-a-round's:

Sub contractor schedules/availibility
Pump repair facilities work load
Compressor repair facilities work load
Lead times on major equipment
vacation schedules
Availability of key people.

Additional comments:

Since refineries are concentrated in limited areas (Houston, Louisiana, Los Angeles), there is a need to spread out the schedules of shut downs so that sub contractors are ready and available to them.

In a major turn-a-round I would guess that as many as 200 to 300 workers for the sub contractors may be involved either at the refinery itself, or in supporting roles.

turn-a-rounds are scheduled preferably during spring and fall, as summer is when gas is at it's highest price and thus they do not want to lose revenue during this time.

Major turn-a-rounds occur each 5-7 years, depending on many factors.

Comment on me: I am not in the refining business, but more of a sub supplier for refiners during normal operations and often during turn-a-rounds.

36 posted on 05/09/2007 7:11:26 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

October is after the summer driving season.


37 posted on 05/09/2007 8:21:19 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Ignorance should be painful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Your original comment implied that all shut downs should occur in October. If they did do that (as if that was possible), there would be severe gas shortages in November.

Fortunately, the refiners have a better sense of running their business then Hillary and most of the others that add comments w/o knowledge.

38 posted on 05/09/2007 8:59:28 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jdm

that’s a laugh!

the democraps make just as much money from “big oil” as the republicans.


39 posted on 05/09/2007 9:01:22 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
No Hillary you worthess C%nt its your environmental wacko policies is the reason why the price of gas is up. If you and your Socialist party cares so dam much about the price of gasoline, then why don't you drop the taxes on the gas. After all you make more on a gallon of gas then Big Oil.

Oh speaking of Big Oil. I heard you have no problem taking donations from BP? If you think the Oil companies are so evil, then return the money they gave you for your campaign. I know I know you will NEVER do that!

40 posted on 05/09/2007 9:03:34 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson