 |
 |
Posted on 05/07/2007 11:30:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
No Thanks, I have no use for him.
I like Guiliani. If Thompson does not get into the race I will vote for Guilani or Romney. If Thompson gets in, he will get my vote. If the choices in the 2008 election are Hillary and Guilani, I will not stay home or vote third party. I will vote for Guilani to keep Hillary out of the whitehouse. Hell I would vote for a rock to keep Hillary out.
“Indeed, we still have eight months before the first caucus and primary votes are cast, a lifetime in politics.”
They can say that again, and that’s at the high-end expected survival rate (LOL). He’s yet to figure out his biggest contender is going to be himself. Slow roasting is ok with me. Fred’s not spending a dime and isn’t jumping headfirst into a meat-grinder. Life is good.
I would vote for a cockroach to keep Hillary out.
So I guess that makes you a RudyBooster of the last resort.
That crap is more suited for Wideawakes. Not FR.
Fact: A vote for Rooty is a vote for liberalism.
What does Hillary offer that is different from Rudy, gender aside?
Two down, one to go.
So if it comes down to that choice, should we flip a coin?
In a desperation move, he hires Roger Clemens to be his
running mate.
She will surrender the WOT, Rudy will not. He is not my first choice but if need be, I will vote for him to keep my family safe. That trumps all to me at this point in time.
Well, I’m sorry you feel that way. I believe regarding the WOT, neither would act different than the other. Thanks for answering.
Hillary has just talked about defunding the Iraq war, and has publicly called for GW to end the Iraq war and bring the troops home before 2008. Rudy agres with GW that the Iraq war needs to be won with Al Qaeda defeated, have Iraq stabilized, then come home. Two completely different visions between Hillary and Rudy. Hillary has already surrendered. That would put you and yours and me and mine in grave danger. You are welcome. :)
|
|
I thought it must be a typo but Googled it and indeed the actual title has “trys”. Weird.
“Two completely different visions between Hillary and Rudy.”
It might look that way. I suppose I should also note that I don’t believe what either one says they’ll do. Which in my mind brings them back together doing exactly what the polls tell them they should do.
I thing Rudy is a good person; more than competent; and I am grateful he was in charge in NYC. He would make a good 'something' for the next Repub president.
He just is not 'presidential' material. And his wife; has already failed, by every stroke; the 'First Lady' rounds. . .
(is she even a Repub; or like Arnold; is Rudy married to a Demrat? If Judy is a Repub. . .want to know when she changed her registration ;^)
Why is gun control being totally ignored? Nothing about it in the debate the other night. No new position statement from Giuliani. The media totally ignores the issue. And people wonder why I categorically refuse to vote for the man. I'll never vote for a gun grabber and Giuliani is a gun grabber. Hence, he will not get my vote, even if he is the nominee.
How will you keep your family safe after Giuliani signs every gun control bill that comes across his desk? Are you ready to surrender your Second Amendment rights and rely on 911? Giuliani isn't just the lessor of two evils...he is just as evil as Hitlery and Hussein.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.