Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5-year term for investigator in forgery case - "I believe that the death penalty is illegal."
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Tuesday, May 1, 2007 | Mark Martin

Posted on 05/01/2007 11:22:18 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

5-year term for investigator in forgery case - "I believe that the death penalty is illegal...It is barbaric and an atrocity...Any acts I committed are out of a firm belief against the state killing these people."

Mark Martin, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

(05-01) 04:00 PDT Sacramento -- A former criminal defense investigator accused of forging statements from jurors, witnesses and others in death penalty cases pleaded guilty to four charges Monday and accepted a five-year prison sentence.

Kathleen Culhane, 40, said outside a Sacramento courtroom that she filed incorrect documents on behalf of five condemned inmates because she believes that capital punishment is wrong.

"I believe that the death penalty is illegal," she said. "It is barbaric and an atrocity. Any acts I committed are out of a firm belief against the state killing these people."

Culhane, who had worked on death penalty appeals since 1999, will likely go to prison in August when she is formally sentenced.

A prosecutor said Culhane's feelings on capital punishment were irrelevant and said filing false documents is "about as serious as it gets."

"It doesn't matter whether you're for or against the death penalty, you have to play by the rules," said Michael Farrell, senior assistant attorney general in state Attorney General Jerry Brown's office.

Culhane was charged in February with 45 criminal charges involving 23 declarations she filed with courts and the governor's office from 2002 to 2006. In the plea bargain with Brown's office, she admitted to one count of perjury, two counts of forgery and one count of filing a false document. Authorities say Culhane made up stories and forged the signatures of witnesses and jurors to benefit clients' appeals.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; anarchy; ca; california; capitalpunishment; corruption; criminaldefense; culhane; deathpenalty; deathrow; fascistjerrybrown; forgery; hugathug; justice; kathleenculhane; machiavelli; moralrelativism; officerofthecourt; radical; ruleoflaw; selfesteem
"I believe that the death penalty is illegal...It is barbaric and an atrocity...Any acts I committed are out of a firm belief against the state killing these people."

Convicted felon Kathleen Culhane and disgraced "investigator" should of also added to her quote:

"I believe that the ends justify the means and I believe that the concept of 'rule of law' doesn't apply to me. I also believe in cheat at any cost principles as depicted in his writing 'The Prince.'"

Well...maybe during her next five years in lock-up, she can get to know some of the psychopathic death row killers whom she so admires. Rot in jail, b-tch.

1 posted on 05/01/2007 11:22:24 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket SACRAMENTO / 5-year term for investigator in forgery case Kathleen Culhane, a former criminal defense investigator, received a five-year sentence for forging documents for death penalty appeals. Sacramento Bee photo by Kevin German via Associated Press
2 posted on 05/01/2007 11:23:42 AM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Nice slap on the wrist


3 posted on 05/01/2007 11:23:53 AM PDT by somniferum (Annoy a liberal.. Work hard and be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somniferum

It’s called anarchy.


4 posted on 05/01/2007 11:27:25 AM PDT by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom to OSSA Blalock-USS Ramage DDG61 Currently Deployed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I don’t like the death penalty because the process takes so blasted long. With each appeal the families of the victims have to go through the crime over and over again, while more attention is given to what is best for the criminal.


5 posted on 05/01/2007 11:29:52 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The income tax is unconstitutional too. Maybe we should all withhold our income taxes?


6 posted on 05/01/2007 11:30:38 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flynmudd
It’s called anarchy.

No, no, no...

It's called creative writing...

Some people make good money at it..

Some are just zealots and do so as an obssession.

7 posted on 05/01/2007 11:30:40 AM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

“”I believe that the ends justify the means and I believe that the concept of ‘rule of law’ doesn’t apply to me.”

Spoken like an illegal alien.


8 posted on 05/01/2007 11:31:07 AM PDT by CAWats (Memo from Bush to O'Donnell and Baldwin: No weapon formed against me will prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6

Regardless of what it’s called, I hope she like carpet.


9 posted on 05/01/2007 11:33:18 AM PDT by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom to OSSA Blalock-USS Ramage DDG61 Currently Deployed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"Maybe we should all withhold our income taxes?"

If we followed the investigator's example we wouldn't withhold; we'd merely falsify our declarations.

10 posted on 05/01/2007 11:33:41 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
Some are just zealots and do so as an obsession.


It's their religion.
11 posted on 05/01/2007 11:33:45 AM PDT by CAWats (Memo from Bush to O'Donnell and Baldwin: No weapon formed against me will prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

Obviously the death appeals process takes so long because of unscrupulous criminal defense teams who are willing to lie, cheat and forge their way through a 20-year death penalty appeal process.


12 posted on 05/01/2007 11:35:48 AM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Something tells me that this person would NOT want leniency for anybody that would attack an abortion clinic — even if the attacker was acting out of revulsion for the killings taking place inside.

But that’s just me judging by appearances and offering an opinion of what might be the case.

13 posted on 05/01/2007 11:36:57 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CAWats

We can thank Bill Clinton and his supporters for setting the example that everyone is above the law, and today we have tens of millions of illegals. And both Democrats and Republicans want more of them, thinking that if we make them citizens, they will vote for us....WRONG, they won’t be voting these old white guys, they will be voting for young, radical Hispanics!!!


14 posted on 05/01/2007 11:42:00 AM PDT by Stayfree (*******************Bin Laden's hiding place exposed at CapitolHillComedy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

2 years max!


15 posted on 05/01/2007 11:47:19 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Another liberal, the ends justify the means.

The cop looks like Joey Butofuco

16 posted on 05/01/2007 11:51:54 AM PDT by bmwcyle ( Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

she looks like Jodie Foster...


17 posted on 05/01/2007 11:53:06 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

she looks like Jodie Foster...


18 posted on 05/01/2007 11:53:08 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Being a liberal means the rules don't apply to you... don't you know anything?... It also means you never have to say I'm sorry.


19 posted on 05/01/2007 11:54:52 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
I don't believe in the death penalty either, except in cases of treason.

I also don't believe in lying, cheating, and forging court documents. What a moron.
20 posted on 05/01/2007 11:57:38 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

She is very stupid to say the lease, she believes the death penalty is illegal. Wow what a tard.


21 posted on 05/01/2007 12:09:07 PM PDT by stockpirate (Al Qaeda is in the United States, they are in the House and Senate, Democrats all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

If you have to get to forgery, maybe you are starting from the wrong position.


22 posted on 05/01/2007 12:17:08 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Personal convictions expel principle in the zealot’s mind.


23 posted on 05/01/2007 12:22:21 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

YES it’s Bill Clinton’s fault we have so many illegals in this country. Thanks for pointing this out to the rest of us. /Sarcasm


24 posted on 05/01/2007 12:23:27 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Jerry Brown is a liberal loon. I’m surprised he defended the law here.


25 posted on 05/28/2007 5:23:08 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Good thinking.


26 posted on 05/28/2007 5:24:04 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

Lookie a Bill Clinton defender.


27 posted on 05/28/2007 5:26:56 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pencil
“Lookie a Bill Clinton defender.”

Lookie we have a Bushbot who can’t think for himself. How many illegals have come in the country in the last 6+ years since Bush became President? What has he done to stop it? Maybe his amnesty talk has even encouraged a bunch...ya think?

Tell me how that is “defending” BC? Little Bushbots like yourself add little to the discourse here in my opinion.

28 posted on 05/29/2007 6:53:11 AM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Well, personally, I think she should die for her actions.

5 years is beyond light, she willingly and willfullly abused the criminal justice system. Her battle was not for justice, or even for holding up the state to its requirement of burden of proof.

She should be on death row.


29 posted on 05/29/2007 6:55:56 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

A Bushbot? Where did you get that slur from, democraticunderground.com?


30 posted on 05/29/2007 12:32:54 PM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pencil

Nope on FR. It’s not a slur per se, just an insult. Mostly directed toward people who somehow think President Bush and his polices are above reproach.


31 posted on 05/29/2007 2:33:49 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

I never commented here about President Bush. That’s just your projection. But to suggest that Bill Clinton actually protected the borders in the 1990s is a fallacy. Illegal immigration skyrocketed during his tenure.


32 posted on 06/01/2007 7:43:45 AM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pencil

“I never commented here about President Bush. That’s just your projection. But to suggest that Bill Clinton actually protected the borders in the 1990s is a fallacy. Illegal immigration skyrocketed during his tenure.”

And I never suggested Clinton didn’t. My point is that Bush deserves as much blame as Clinton if not more due to the amnesty talk.


33 posted on 06/01/2007 8:44:41 AM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

> Well, personally, I think she should die for her actions.

I wonder if any/many of the cases she interfered with will be re-tried? And if so, how many will result in executions?

I don’t think she should get the Death Penalty for this: as bad as it is, ten years should be adequate. But she *should* be made to witness every execution that arises from the re-trials, and personally apologize to the hapless condemned felon and his family before they string him up.


34 posted on 06/10/2007 11:27:07 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

Nope, she willing and willfully undermined the justice system and thumbed her nose at the rule of law, and did all this as an AGENT of the court. Capital Punishment is more than justified as far as I’m concerned.

She believed herself and her cause to be above and beyond the law and in the process perverted the justice system to achieve her goals. I think 10 years is wholey inadequate.

You cannot have a nation of laws, if attacks on that system are not treated as complete affronts to the entire foundations of society. Her actions were treasonous, and warrant death.


35 posted on 06/11/2007 9:24:13 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Five years? Give her the chair.

Now wouldn't that be ironic!
36 posted on 06/11/2007 9:27:16 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

> You cannot have a nation of laws, if attacks on that system are not treated as complete affronts to the entire foundations of society. Her actions were treasonous, and warrant death.

Put that way, it is difficult to argue with your logic. In which case, America needs to revisit the preferred means of execution.

Lethal Injection is just a tad too... sterile and clinical. It has no stigma attached to it: it’s just a medical procedure.

There was nothing wrong with hanging as an execution methodology, and it carried a certain stigma that no other execution methods did.

So, if what you are talking about is “Treason”, then it follows that it is best to ensure that the Traitor is Hanged, and thereby gets the full benefit of the stigma that goes with being hoist up the yardarm to dance a merry jig midair, “to encourage the others...”


37 posted on 06/11/2007 1:48:19 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson