Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political activity by White House probed [including a White House office led by Karl Rove.......]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 04/24/2007 2:02:32 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Political activity by White House probed

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 22 minutes ago

A little-known federal investigative unit has launched a probe into allegations of illegal political activity within the executive branch, including a White House office led by President Bush's close adviser, Karl Rove.

The new investigation, which began several weeks ago, grew out of two other investigations still under way at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel: the firing of U.S. Attorney David Iglesias from New Mexico and a presentation by Rove aide J. Scott Jennings to political appointees at the General Services Administration on how to help Republican candidates in 2008.

"We're in the preliminary stages of opening this expanded investigation," Loren Smith, a spokesman for the special counsel's office, an independent investigative and prosecutorial agency, said Tuesday. "The recent suggestion of illegal political activities across the executive branch was the basis we used to decide that it was important to look into possible violations of the Hatch Act."

The office, led by Scott J. Bloch, enforces the Hatch Act, a 70-year-old law that bars federal employees from engaging in political activities using government resources or on government time.

Whether politics played an inappropriate part in the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, including Iglesias, was at the heart of the controversy that has threatened Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' job. Whether executive branch employees violated federal laws that restrict them from using their posts for political activity also is at the center of the controversy about the January meeting at GSA.

"Six participants have confirmed that, at the end of the presentation, GSA Administrator Lurita Doan asked all present to consider how they could use GSA to 'help our candidates' in 2008,'"

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rymb

1 posted on 04/24/2007 2:02:35 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
engaging in political activities using government resources or on government time.

Like campaigning?
2 posted on 04/24/2007 2:04:27 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Can anyone say, “Clinton War Room”.?


3 posted on 04/24/2007 2:06:05 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR


4 posted on 04/24/2007 2:07:43 PM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"We're in the preliminary stages of opening this expanded investigation," Loren Smith, a spokesman for the special counsel's office, an independent investigative and prosecutorial agency, said Tuesday.

Is this the same office that vigorously went after Bill Clinton and the Chinese, and Al Gore and the Buddhist Temple, and Bill Clinton and the Lincoln Bedroom Motel?

5 posted on 04/24/2007 2:07:48 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The special council has absolutely no authority to prosecute and the most he can do is write a nasty letter to the President asking him to remove Rove. The media is really scraping the bottom of the barrel on finding a scandal.
6 posted on 04/24/2007 2:11:04 PM PDT by tobyhill (only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


7 posted on 04/24/2007 2:33:32 PM PDT by italianquaker ("blue dog democrats", that dog dont hunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I am so sick of this crap!!!!!!


8 posted on 04/24/2007 2:40:47 PM PDT by Antique Gal (Antique Gal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Antique Gal
Koochie Kucinich just offered articles of impeachment against Cheney and said that if he went for the President first Cheney would become President and that’s why he did it.
9 posted on 04/24/2007 2:46:08 PM PDT by tobyhill (only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Childish, “You impeached ours” now “We impeach yours” B.S..


10 posted on 04/24/2007 2:59:53 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Childish, “You impeached ours” now “We impeach yours” B.S.

Exactly. It's up to the Bush administration to hammer the democrats over this. Will they? NO!

11 posted on 04/24/2007 3:22:53 PM PDT by sarasotarepublican (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

According to www.macsmind.com/wordpress/, this is being done by the White House to wrap this issue up for good. Nothing to worry about. I hope he is right


12 posted on 04/24/2007 4:27:32 PM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

But a valid thing to investigate is about the fact that Iglesias was fired for “not being there enough”, but he was not there because he was doing his national guard duty. It’s illegal to fire a guy for not being at work if his military service requires it. If Rove or anyone else did that, they deserve what is coming to them.


13 posted on 04/24/2007 4:52:19 PM PDT by ProudAmericanVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This is just too rich not to share with everyone;

Rove's Newest Investigator Is Under Investigation

14 posted on 04/24/2007 7:26:52 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

This site seems a bad lefty one. Anti Bush hate stuff out the wazoo.

The point being made there is that this investigator of Rove is head of an office because Bush appointed him. If people are complaining about him it’s mainly because he’s Bush’s man and some think he’s not doing his job properly in that he’s too partisan, etc. Read “Pro Bush” is what I got from it. That he would be investigating Rove I think would hack off the leftys because they would assume he’s there to cover up for Rove and not to cause him or Bush trouble.

So, I’m not sure what your point is that he himself is being investigated. That’s not a good thing, from what I gleaned from the blog and the comments.


15 posted on 04/24/2007 8:46:15 PM PDT by txrangerette (Congressman Duncan Hunter for POTUS...check him out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

My point is, I just find it very funny that the investigator is and has been under investigation himself.

The site does seems a bit worried about that. Is it possibly a diversion from the Dems other endless investigations?

Who appointed Bloch? What will be the effect of him also being under investigation?

In the LA Times article, Bloch pretty much says he is acting on his own, but is he? It seems a lot rides on the outcome of the investigation against him.

It will be interesting to see just how it plays out, but if it upsets the left, I usually like it.


16 posted on 04/24/2007 9:22:20 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Where’s that picture of OBAMA, sitting with his top campaign advisor, IN HIS SENATE OFFICE???!!!


17 posted on 04/25/2007 5:03:15 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

This might be a very smart move by Rove/Bush to head off the RAT a*oles.


18 posted on 04/25/2007 5:05:45 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmericanVet

They serve at the pleasure of the President. Enough said.


19 posted on 04/25/2007 5:08:10 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..Doing real on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmericanVet

BTW, welcome to FRee Republic.


20 posted on 04/25/2007 5:08:49 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..Doing real on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed; txrangerette; AmericaUnited

There may be a reason for that :

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-probe25apr25,0,3685373,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines


“Critics doubt official looking into Rove
Advocacy groups cite Bloch’s ties to the administration.
By Tom Hamburger, Times Staff Writer
April 25, 2007

WASHINGTON — Even as Special Counsel Scott J. Bloch moved forward with plans for a sweeping probe of the Bush administration, several advocacy groups complained that his ties to the administration and to conservative groups, as well as his record on gay rights and whistle-blowers, made him the wrong man for the job.

“There is a serious question as to whether Bloch will just provide cover for an administration that is covering for him,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a Democratic-leaning group.

A spokesman for the Office of Special Counsel, communications director James Mitchell, waved away the complaints, saying agency staffers have already begun to form an internal task force, led in part by career staff, to probe three broad areas of activity involving the White House and senior advisor Karl Rove.

The agency will use its subpoena power if necessary, Mitchell said. It will focus on whether White House political concerns improperly intruded on the decision to fire at least one U.S. attorney; whether Rove’s office staff or others violated the Hatch Act in briefing Cabinet agency managers on political developments and Republican campaign goals; and whether the White House improperly used Republican National Committee e-mail accounts for official business.

Many of those e-mails are now missing, and Bloch has said his agency will probably join the effort to find them.

The advocacy groups charge, among other things, that Bloch initiated a policy that made it more difficult for gay employees to allege discrimination.

A whistle-blower group said Bloch had a poor record of protecting those reporting wrongdoing. And, these critics pointed out, the Office of Personnel Management is investigating alleged improper employment practices including intimidation of workers at the Special Counsel agency.

...

Mitchell said office procedures on whistle-blower and other cases were reviewed by a bipartisan congressional staff in 2005 that later provided a positive report.

While Bloch has alienated advocacy groups on the left, he has also lost support from White House insiders, according to one report. The Weekly Standard, a conservative magazine, reported last year that Bloch was ostracized by the White House and might even be urged to step down.

Mitchell said such attacks are expected by investigators like Bloch. “He is a watchdog,” Mitchell said. “That’s what he likes to do.”



21 posted on 04/25/2007 8:51:25 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson