Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bonds is wrong to wear No. 42
ESPN - Page 2 ^ | 4/16/2007 | Jeff Pearlman

Posted on 04/15/2007 9:37:49 PM PDT by smith288

Bonds is wrong to wear No. 42

On Feb. 7, President Bush took a trip to Shenandoah National Park, where he dressed up in earth tones, stood before some trees and held a news conference to announce an increase in the National Park Service's budget.

It was a glorious time for all. Tony Snow, the White House press secretary, boasted that the president was "keenly committed both to environmentalism and conservationism from the start." Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne went one step further, likening Bush to Teddy Roosevelt.

Yes, that Teddy Roosevelt.

Of course, by now all noncomatose homo sapiens realize that Bush is to the environment what Hulk Hogan was to the Iron Sheik's head. He's pro- Alaska oil drilling, anti- the ban on snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, pro- curtailing the federal standard for arsenic in drinking water and, most recently, anti- the right of states to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from motor vehicles.

He also hates long walks on the beach and birds that chirp.

And yet, when Bush shows up at a forest gate to kiss a leopard, none of us flinch. We are numb to the phenomenon. It is what it is -- a public figure extolling a virtue, then doing zilch to support it.

Which leads us, naturally, to Barry Lamar Bonds.

As announced last week, the San Francisco slugger plans on celebrating the 60th anniversary of Jackie Robinson's big league debut by joining other active players in wearing No. 42. "I'm proud to do this," Bonds told MLB.com's Barry Bloom. "There's no person who was more important to the African-American cause in baseball history than Jackie Robinson. He paved the way for Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, everybody. You just can't underestimate the impact Jackie had on this game."

Though Bonds' words are righteous (Bloom, his personal stenographer, would allow nothing less), his gesture is as authentic as a Sidd Finch heater. Now in his 22nd major league season, Bonds' track record in areas of race and sports is, to be polite, abysmal. Here is a man who, according to infinite associates and peers, has rarely -- if ever -- gone out of his way to assist a rookie African-American teammate trying to find his way; who sees young black fans not as potential heirs to the game, but as autograph-seeking gnats to be insulted or dismissed. Four years ago, Bonds spit in the face of the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum by ignoring an invitation to be presented with one of its Legacy Awards (taken aback by the public outcry, he finally visited four months later).

To his credit, Bonds once used his celebrity to influence a political campaign. To his discredit, the candidate he endorsed was former California governor Pete Wilson, an arch-conservative whose stances on minority issues were only slightly to the left of David Duke. In fact, Wilson seems something of a role model for the Bonds Guide to Honoring Dead Civil Rights Icons: In 1995, while promoting the "California Civil Rights Initiative," a ballot measure that would ban all state affirmative action, Wilson routinely evoked the name (but not spirit) of Martin Luther King.

Hmmm ...

Of the countless transgressions that make Bonds the last man who should wear No. 42, the one that gets me -- that really, really, really gets me -- is the way he has treated his black baseball forefathers like Aaron not as legends to be honored, but as stepping stones in his own maligned assault on the record books.

Whether one believes he cheated or not, reportedly the amount of documentation detailing Bonds' usage of performance-enhancing drugs stretches to Pluto. With this in mind, how can Bonds both wear No. 42 for Robinson and surpass Aaron as baseball's all-time home run leader?

If little else, Bonds is no dummy. He knows of Aaron's legacy: of the hate mail and the death threats, of the extra security guards and the terror that one bullet from the stands would end his life. Surely Bonds knows that Aaron is not simply a baseball hero, but a shining beacon from the civil rights era. The courage Aaron displayed in taking the field each night, usually in a Deep South still dripping with racist venom, is something Bonds can never duplicate.

So, again, how does Bonds break the all-time home run record with a straight face? How can he speak of "the great Hank Aaron" (as he does) while doing everything in his power to expunge his name from the record books?

Answer: Self-denial. Does Bush think global warming is just a harmless hoax? Does Hillary Clinton truly believe her Iraq authorization votes were righteous? Does Sean Hannity actually think that by attending an event on Martin Luther King's birthday he's in touch with civil rights? Does Sanjaya really think he can sing? As my father used to tell me, "Before you fool others, fool yourself."

It's true. We are fools.

I have no doubt Barry Bonds believes that, by wearing No. 42, he is doing what appears to be the right thing. Read that again -- what appears to be. Yet the right thing is seldom about words (ask Don Imus), written or said. It's about intent, purpose and -- most of all -- actions. Who do they impact? What do they mean? What do they say?

Here, on the 60th anniversary of Jackie Robinson changing the world, is what Bonds is saying: I am Barry Bonds -- and I don't give a damn.

Jeff Pearlman is a former Sports Illustrated senior writer and the author of "Love Me, Hate Me: Barry Bonds and the Making of an Antihero", now available in paperback. You can reach him at anngold22@yahoo.com.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: baseball; bonds; environment; robinson
This guy annoys me. I dont like Bonds but I sense an unhealthy fixation on Bonds and trying a little to hard to find faults. And the out of the blue slam on Bush?
1 posted on 04/15/2007 9:37:51 PM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smith288
Jeff Pearlman. Another in a long line of ultra-lib, jackass Jewish sprotswriters.

F him.

I'm sure he has a picture of Arafat on his self hating wall.

2 posted on 04/15/2007 9:42:48 PM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

In total agreement here.


3 posted on 04/15/2007 9:43:08 PM PDT by Chuck54 (A truly happy person is one who can enjoy the scenery on a detour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

The needle pusher.


4 posted on 04/15/2007 9:43:29 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
An asterisk would be far more appropriate than a number for Bonds’ jersey.
5 posted on 04/15/2007 9:44:00 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

It irks me that they wrongly pretend to know and care about nature from their urban penthouses. Bush deserves lots of credit.


6 posted on 04/15/2007 10:06:40 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Baseball went down hill as soon as Bob Euycer (sp?) left the game.
7 posted on 04/15/2007 10:09:17 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Is ESPN Communist? Didn’t Keith Olbermann work for ESPN? Can I assume they are just a bunch of liberal pukes?


8 posted on 04/15/2007 10:18:53 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
*
9 posted on 04/15/2007 10:20:27 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Prevent Glo-Ball Warming ... turn out the sun when not in use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

According to the left-wing idiot who wrote this article, Pete Wilson was only slightly to the left of David Duke because he didn’t support affirmative action? Oh, brother!

The real racists in this country are the left-wing jerks who support affirmative action, which in itself is a racist practice.

On ESPN tonight, they were going on and on (to the point I had to change the channel) about how not enough blacks are playing baseball. They’re alarmed by it. They’re distressed by it. Most of the ESPN on-air reporters are racists. They’re looking at Major Leaguers and seeing only skin color. When they say not enough blacks are in the big leagues, they must also be saying there are TOO MANY whites in Major League Baseball. That is indeed racism, not anything Pete Wilson did.


10 posted on 04/15/2007 10:33:27 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
LOL. Make that two: *, *'s

Bond's and Perlman.

11 posted on 04/15/2007 10:37:23 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Baseball survived the Blacksox scandal of 1919.

It will survive the Barry Bonds travesty.

The scars will fade.

12 posted on 04/15/2007 10:42:40 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
It's true. We are fools.

Speak for yourself, shmendrick. I could go on about your lack of understanding on the arsenic issue, but I won't. because you are a fool. By the way, and not to take anything away from Jackie, but what about the guys who HIRED Robinson? What if they picked Larry Doby instead?

13 posted on 04/15/2007 10:49:44 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: smith288
Bonds is wrong to wear No. 42

The headline screams, "I WANT ATTENTION LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME!"

Jeff Perlman -- another idiot, should be working at SI.

15 posted on 04/16/2007 5:27:03 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

The writing quality of SI dropped into the “See Dick. See Dick run” category some time ago. This article reads like caveman grunts. This guy takes a stick into the backyard and digs for grubs for breakfast.


16 posted on 04/16/2007 5:28:17 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Ice-cubes melting in the sun is an act of God. Get over it, Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oh, he used to work at SI. That explains it.

AND he was the guy who laughed along with John Rocker, egging him on to trash blacks, etc., then picking a fight with him in the runway later on.

This guy's a real scumbag of a journalist.

17 posted on 04/16/2007 5:31:41 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Liberal sportswriters are the biggest critics of Bonds. Why that goes unnoticed on FR, I have no idea.


18 posted on 04/16/2007 8:15:51 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Liberal sportswriters are the biggest critics of Bonds. Why that goes unnoticed on FR, I have no idea.

Not sure what you are getting at? We supposed to support Bonds or the liberal a-hole who doesn't like Bonds?

My criticism of this tripe is that he has little expertise on the subject of the environment but decided to slam Bush and somehow compare him to the scumbag of baseball, Barry Bonds.

I am no fan of Bonds but I think I dislike liberal, dishonest, agenda driven asses like Mr Pearlman.

19 posted on 04/16/2007 10:21:41 AM PDT by smith288 (Ohio State, close to being 2007 NCAA Champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Correction:

I am no fan of Bonds but I think I dislike liberal, dishonest, agenda driven asses like Mr Pearlman more....
20 posted on 04/16/2007 10:36:06 AM PDT by smith288 (Ohio State, close to being 2007 NCAA Champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54
So should Bonds have refused to wear the number? Apparently that'd be better in Perelman's eyes.

What a "maroon".

21 posted on 04/16/2007 10:40:53 AM PDT by Teacher317 (Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smith288

That was crazy. But then again, most leftists are.


22 posted on 04/16/2007 3:30:32 PM PDT by kenth (I got tired of my last tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson