Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Offshore Outsourcing Mostly About Lower Salaries? No Kidding!
Information Week ^ | Apr 6, 2007 | Mary Hayes Weier

Posted on 04/08/2007 9:15:18 PM PDT by A. Pole

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Vinnie
Why not outsource the position of CEO?

Indeed. And Halliburton just did outsource their entire HQ to Dubai.

H'mmm. When do their U.S. taxpayer-funded contracts come up for renewal? Time to "In Source"

21 posted on 04/09/2007 9:01:36 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
It's not only lower wages. When you look at the litigation and other regulatory costs,,,it's no wonder companies go overseas.

If you were a CEO,,,,and the CFO came in your office and said,,,,"How about this? We go overseas,,,,not only lower wages,,,,but reduced legal costs (no lawsuits for affirmative action, sexual harrassment, age discrimination, etc),,,,no unions,,,no social security costs,,,reduced health care costs,,,, etc. " He makes a compelling case.

22 posted on 04/09/2007 9:07:55 AM PDT by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
It's not only lower wages. When you look at the litigation and other regulatory costs,,,it's no wonder companies go overseas.

Actually, the regulations and litigation can only be partially evaded...as the manufacturers of toxic pet food will soon discover. I don't think the US companies are going to allow themselves to be the sole saps taking the fall for what the Red Chinese...may have done quite deliberately as a test of the U.S. food-safety protections.

But taxes are clearly in favor of shutting down in the U.S. and rushing pell mell to China, which SUBSIDIZES its exports. Then importing back to the U.S., which unlike China, has no tariff protection. The Chinese "partnered" operation pays no US corporate or personal income taxes on its Chinese production. Nor capital gains so long as the profits are not repatriated back to the U.S. but plowed back "re-invested" into Chinese expansion.

As for no unions...that isn't quite true. They simply require that the unions MUST be communist party unions (so much for true "freedom" eh) and the head of the union shop...must be the boss of the plant!?!!

23 posted on 04/09/2007 9:17:07 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Then importing back to the U.S., which unlike China, has no tariff protection.

We have no tariffs on imports from China? Source?

The Chinese "partnered" operation pays no US corporate or personal income taxes on its Chinese production.

An American company pays taxes on all income earned anywhere in the world, even China.

24 posted on 04/09/2007 12:20:05 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson