Here's a tickler for y'all...
My wife's carry.
Posted on 04/08/2007 8:46:57 PM PDT by freespirited
Shelly Parker did everything she could to keep her home safe. She owned a dog. She called police when she suspected illegal activity on her block. She installed a security camera on her front window.
Her crime-fighting efforts made an impression. One night, Parker found her car window smashed and saw rocks scattered around the vehicle. She felt it was retaliation....
A police officer gave her some advice.
Get a gun, he told her.
Parker later joined five other residents who took the government to court in an effort to overturn the city's 31-year-old handgun ban. In March, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in their favor, striking down key elements of the statute by a 2 to 1 vote. ... the judges said the Second Amendment gives residents the right to keep loaded guns in their homes.
The lawsuit bearing her name, Parker vs. the District of Columbia, probably will make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The D.C. attorney general's office said that the city will file a petition tomorrow to have the case reheard before the full Court of Appeals. The gun law is expected to remain intact while proceedings unfold.
The court's decision has been hailed by gun-rights organizations and others who consider themselves staunch defenders of constitutional rights. But D.C. officials and gun-control advocates fear wiping out the ban will proliferate violence. Some have argued that the half-dozen residents who filed the lawsuit are outside the norm in a city once labeled the nation's murder capital.
For Parker, the court ruling is a victory for residents who believe a firearm provides protection when fighting for safe communities. "The only thing between me and somebody entering my home are harsh words," Parker said. "That's all I have."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
And who runs D.C? Liberals, of course. Liberal govt = fear and frustration. When will the people of D.C. learn their lesson.
As you read through the article all of the liberals simply say , more or less: “I’m afraid of guns so they should be illegal.” If we banned everything that liberals were afraid of we’d no longer have a constitution (afraid of guns, afraid of free speech, afraid of Christians/conservative Jews, afraid of SUVs, etc.)
bttt
“As you read through the article all of the liberals simply say , more or less: “I’m afraid of guns so they should be illegal.” If we banned everything that liberals were afraid of we’d no longer have a constitution (afraid of guns, afraid of free speech, afraid of Christians/conservative Jews, afraid of SUVs, etc.)”
Well, I’m afraid of freaking liberals. Can you blame me? Damn, I surrounded.
ping for later read
Here's a tickler for y'all...
My wife's carry.
Banning liberals... Now there’s an idea!
Now that is a fine looking tribute to the Second Amendment
P232. Very elegant.
I just wish modern firearms had very small and elegant maker’s marks on them, rather than giant stampings or laser etchings of the make and model.
Czech vz.82
L
photo courtesy of Pearce Grips
“The success stories of self-defense are few and far between compared to the accidents and negligence and guns being stolen and ending up in crimes and homicides,” he said.” (from the article)
Even if that were true....which it certainly is not, it does not diminish the fact that a person has the RIGHT to own a gun and defend themselves.
Dollars to donut shops the way “he” is counting this is by incidents of people actually shooting back at an attacker. Much more commonly, simply showing the gun suffices and the would be attacker flees.
It’s beyond me why politicians think they have the right to tell a citizen that he or she has no right to use a gun for protection.
Definitely and it's even better to go on and read the comments, all of which ar pro-2d Amendment. I was surprised to see so much good sense from DC residents.
Fascinating article. When “Parker” becomes as famed as “Miranda”, this tale will be an important part of the history.
Here’s a startling paragraph from the article:
‘Some black neighbors said that the police didn’t pay much attention to the area and patrolled more vigilantly on the other side of Lincoln Park, which was more affluent and white. Parker said some even told her that they were initially disappointed when they saw she was the home buyer. “I had some of my neighbors say, ‘I had hoped you were white.’ They had hoped it had been somebody who was white, somebody who would really step in and put the fear of God in the drug dealer and stop some of the nonsense going on,” she recalled.’
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Of note: Parker, and four other plaintiffs, lost the case for lack of standing - because she did not file for a permit which, by law, would never be granted.
This is something lost in the bustle about Parker. Only plaintiff Heller actually applied for the in-home-possession permit, knowing full well that by law the permit would not be granted, even to an upstanding citizen (himself an off-duty cop) - and he was of course rejected. (Why DC maintains an office for processing permit applications which shall, by law, _never_ be granted, I don't understand.) Only by having that rejection in-hand did the DC Circuit grant him standing ... and explicitly denied standing to the other 5 plaintiffs.
Nice Kimber! Is the Ultra Carry new?
Yes they are. I have two Rugers. One is a .357 Blackhawk that I bought in 1971, and the other a Ruger .357 Bisley Vaquero that I got about two years ago. I shoot them both in SASS events. Fun guns in 158 gr. .38 spl.
I also have a Marlin 1894 Cowboy Competition and a Stoeger 12 ga. sbs Coach Gun for SASS also.
You may want to look into a Heckler & Koch (German) pistol. I did a LOT of research, and it is an incredibly well engineered pistol.
Here's my HK P2000:
It's a DA/SA with the decocker on the rear next to the hammer. 11# pull on the first shot, 4# on the remaining 12 rounds. It comes with four adjustable backstraps to custom fit the grip to the individual.
It's Terrific carry as well as home defense gun.
I’ve had the 9mm version for years now. And the design has been around since before 1995, when it was th HS95 and adopted by the Croatian military and police. That become the HS2000 and later the XD. So it it’s basic design has about 12 years under its belt.
I don’t think your man Rudy would approve of yur having that gun.
He did everything he could to undermine the Second Amendment as Mayor of New York.
So, Flashbunny, I think you should look elsewhere for a candidate!!!
Rudy certainly ain’t my man! Check out my homepage!
(You may be confusing me with some other ‘bunny’ on the site that’s pro rudy. That’s happened before.)
I stand corrected. I didn’t know it had such a long history. Good to know. Thanks.
No problem. Most people equate the existence of the pistol as being from the time springfield took over the importation from Intrac. Probably because with Intrac it had a different name and almost no ad budget.
If the court had said that, they'd be wrong. But they didn't, they said the Second Amendment protects the right of individual citizens to keep loaded guns in their homes. Big Difference. Government can protect, respect, or violate the right, but it can't give it, nor can it take it away.
Mine, or nearly so, I don't have the "carry" rear sight, but I do have a ported barrel. Mine is also .45 ACP, while I think the photo of a .40.
No - It's been around a while. I've had mine for 6 - 7 years. They are making them in SS now too. They also have some neat factory "custom" jobs. Accurate sumbitch too.
Sorry. I think the other was “Bunnyslippers”
The liberal leftist government of DC can’t and won’t help protect citizens.
Since our #1 obligation in life is to preserve the self, we have an obligation to defend ourselves. So it is morally right and justified to own a gun (even if it’s illegal) for self defense.
Politicians however (as we all know) are frequently intimidated by firearms. Not only is this not a bad thing, it's exactly the point, and is why the framers enshrined protection of the right in the constitution in the first place. The second amendment is one of the "checks and balances" we hear so much about, and it's great that it's looking like it's going to be seen that way again.
In fact, it's the politicians who are the most anti-gun who are by no coincidence, the ones we most desperately need to bring back in line. We need to remind them that they work for us, and not the other way around.
That Redhawk is 45LC. I got it to go with my Puma 454 (also shoots the 45LC).
I use full power hand loads (1050 fps) and even some old Elmer Kieth loads that hit around 1500fps from the 5.5 barrel and around 1800 fps from the Puma. These are pushing 260 grain RNFPGC.
The Puma is 18 inch ported and makes quite a ‘boom’. LOTS of fun at the range.
Except on the caliber ;)
What? You don’t like 9mm?
Someone (Jeff Cooper?) once said: “A 9mm is a .45 set on stun”
A really small 9mm (no double stack - short barrel) is OK if concealment is your first priority - but there are so many better options.
Sorry to disagree with Col. Cooper but the 9mm is a fine SD round weather you are going concealed or not.
That said I prefer a .45 BUT, that is just my preference. A 9mm will stop anyone properly hit with it as will many other rounds.
I always ask those that think only a ** caliber is worth carrying if they would mind if a shot them with a smaller caliber than they stated. So far I haven’t had any takers. ;)
Ah. Another “mine is bigger than yours” comment.
Having read FBI ballistics test reports, I can assure you that this is a “mine is more effective” comment.
The conclusions of the report very simply put:
In terms of incapacitation, Handgun rounds are generally inferior to rifle ammunition.
The 9mm was identified as being particularly ineffective.
The .45 and the .357 were determined to be the most effective SD handgun cartridges. (The study predated 10mm and .40 S&W)
I owned a S&W 5906 and traded it in on the Kimber.
Old data. Come over to my house and I'll put 16 rounds in a 3" circle at 7 yards in under five seconds.
To each his own. I can afford .45 acp weapons. I just don't like the caliber. Is everyone supposed to like .45 acp?
These caliber wars are stooopid.
The Navy SEALS don't seem to have problems with 9mm. But I guess you're more experienced than they.
The Kimber owners I know dumped them and went with Sigs and Colts.
I don't have a good picture of mine, so I'm borrowing one off of Google... ;-)
EAA Witness 10mm Full sized. Wonder Finish. 20# recoil spring, polished feed ramp, Wolf mag springs, trimmed down the ejector, and did a home trigger job on it that really cleaned up the DA break on it. Coming up are Elite series wooden grips, adjustable rear sight, ambi-safety, and possibly a threaded 6" barrel for suppressed goodness.
My piece:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.