Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite strains, U.S. could fight a third war: (Sec'y of Defense) Gates
Reuters ^ | March 22, 2007 | Kristin Roberts

Posted on 03/25/2007 1:31:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I suspect we'd all be surprised how peaceful Afghanistan and Iraq would become if Iran had to defend their home soil.

Our ability to fight a third war is also highly dependent on who and how a third war would start. If Iran starts it, they will see a NATO force strike back the likes of which have not been seen for 60 years.

IMO, Iran is agitating, wanting someone to attack them. The diminutive one cannot count on his people to fight if he starts the fight, but a fight is what he is wanting..


41 posted on 03/26/2007 5:51:14 AM PDT by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, will lie to anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24; Jedi Master Pikachu; xzins; Gamecock; P-Marlowe; OrthodoxPresbyterian

You are exactly correct, Jude.

The US could easily win any war against just about any nation, if the issue is battlefield victory. Most nations would easily be subdued. (The exceptions are China, Russia, England, France, Pakistan, India,....maybe Brazil and Israel.)

You might note that those are all nuclear powers.

If we aren't interested in nation building after the offensive campaign, then the idea of kicking butt and going home could easily be achieved.


42 posted on 03/26/2007 7:14:39 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Northern Alliance

Iraq is really a police action. How many Police Officers get killed by criminals each year in America?


43 posted on 03/26/2007 7:50:12 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I think the point is that, the datalink to the RPV is vulnerable, especially if you're talking real time interaction as an RPV would require.

In addition to sat kills, you also have to consider the possibility of jamming. Put out enough strong RF and the RPV will be useless. Some sort of on board AI may prevent loss of assets, but otherwise the mission fails.

And back to the satellite, the Chicoms used a missile, but what about directed energy weapons. Those would not be limited by higher orbits of satellites. You don't think the US is the only country working on them, do you?

Are more sophisticated RPV's coming. Absolutely! Are pilots going to go away entirely? I don't think so.

44 posted on 03/26/2007 8:10:59 AM PDT by AFreeBird (This space for rent. Inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Walk up to the next group of Afghanistan War Veterans and tell them they were in a Police Action. Better yet, stop into the nearest US Army or US Marine Corps Recruiting Office and see if you're man enough to find out for yourself if it's a war or a police action.



45 posted on 03/26/2007 6:23:35 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson