Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo: Gonzales Must Go
The Stiletto ^ | March 21, 2007 | The Stiletto

Posted on 03/21/2007 4:21:43 AM PDT by theothercheek

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Enduring Freedom

the spineless gop often let the dems do their dirty work

whenever they want one of their own to go, rather than courageously confront and lobby for change, they out-source to the democratic party and hide in the caves

the gop party is the party of cowards and fools


21 posted on 03/21/2007 5:03:07 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (what does al qaeda and bush have in common? caves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

I know. As far as I'm concerned the firing of the 8 US attorneys is a bulls**t reason to get rid of Gonzales, but if that's what it takes then so be it. There are so many other reasons, but I do think the Sandy Berger thing is at the top of the heap. I have to think that both Ashcroft and Gonzales were told by Bush to back off Berger. Why Bush wants to protect Clinton's legacy I do not know, but it doesn't matter which party is in power Job One is always to protect the status quo, the elites. If Scooter Libby "lied" about conversations he did not remember having, Berger lied about EVERYTHING!!! At the least he should be up on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. I think We The People have to scream our heads off about Berger and make sure that Gonzales' replacement re-opens the investigation as soon as his buns hit the attorney general's desk chair.


22 posted on 03/21/2007 5:06:20 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: paguch

I agree with you and pantehrmom. There's much more to this than we are being told. I have to admit, I can't wait to see the back of Bush, already, and thank G-d Cheney is not running. Otherwise it would be more of the SOS.


23 posted on 03/21/2007 5:09:53 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

"Doing right by the People" is a matter of individual perspective. To some, national health care would be doing right by the People. To me, it would not.

In matters of conscience reasonable people may reasonably differ.


24 posted on 03/21/2007 5:10:01 AM PDT by aligncare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

the reason you don't fire gonzo is because the dems will be emboldened if you do


The Dems have been emboldened by keeping him. I can't tell you how many people I've talked to that gave up on the GOP because of the Berger amnesty.


25 posted on 03/21/2007 5:11:23 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

We would not be having this discussion were RUdy president now. Nor would we be having one about Mel Martinez at the RNC.


26 posted on 03/21/2007 5:18:12 AM PDT by twonie (RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: paguch

I am getting real sick and tired of the so called WAR ON TERROR. What an insult to the men and women who are laying their lives on the line. The hypocracy of these people! Yeah, lets send our military over to Iraq to fight but, lets leave OUR BORDERS OPEN, even though we were attacked on our own soil. Yeah, really it was no big deal that Sandy Berger stole those documents, I mean, it was all in the past, don't ya know. It really doesn't matter because he was part of the Clinton administration and we all know the attack occured while Bush was in office. All those previous attacks really weren't all that important, not enough people died. In the meantime, us poor citizen's would be doing jail time for the things this justice department is allowing everyone else to get away with.


27 posted on 03/21/2007 5:21:44 AM PDT by panthermom (DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: twonie

We would not be having this discussion were RUdy president now. Nor would we be having one about Mel Martinez at the RNC.


There's nothing about Rudy that indicates he would go against the powers that be. He wouldn't cave to criticism like Bush often seems to, but I'm not sure that there isn't more going on.


28 posted on 03/21/2007 5:22:34 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

bush is protecting clinton because he is one of the family

dad said so!


29 posted on 03/21/2007 5:25:22 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (what does al qaeda and bush have in common? caves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I dont agree. I have felt Gonzales sucked from the beginning.

I dont believe he should be replaced because he fired the Attorney Generals however, he does need firing.

This may be bad timing but Gonzales sucks.


30 posted on 03/21/2007 5:26:15 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
I agree totally. Gonzales is a RINO and his department's illegitimate prosecution of Border agents and failure to adequately enforce immigration laws is a travesty.
31 posted on 03/21/2007 5:26:40 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

I guess I'm one of them. Though for me, it was more like giving up on Bush - a process that started with the Harriet Myers fiasco (I don't know who would have been a more incompetent Justice her or Gonzales), continued with the border patrol agents fiasco (prosecuting the agents for the cover-up is one thing, but giving amnesty to an illegal alien drugs smuggler to bring the case against them is a whole 'nother thing) and was completed with the Berger fiasco (we're fighting them over there without ever being able to find out what they were up to over here).


32 posted on 03/21/2007 5:30:03 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

BARF!!!


33 posted on 03/21/2007 5:31:13 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Another pile-on. And I'm sick of it.

Why can't we focus (and why can't the administration) publicize) the good things that have come out of the Justice Department under Gonzales????


For me, the rounding up of THOUSANDS of internet predators and Kiddie porn perps is the number 1 reason I stand behind him. How about the arrest of shild prositiution traffickers? Show me any similar success from the 'other side'. Show me where any other governemnt has even taken on such a task. We need to concentrate on accomplishments, not failures or misteps, real or perceived.

Or are we another 'when i do right, no one remembers..." The firing of the justices is a NON-issue. Period.


34 posted on 03/21/2007 5:33:24 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

I guess I'm one of them. Though for me, it was more like giving up on Bush - a process that started with the Harriet Myers fiasco (I don't know who would have been a more incompetent Justice her or Gonzales), continued with the border patrol agents fiasco (prosecuting the agents for the cover-up is one thing, but giving amnesty to an illegal alien drugs smuggler to bring the case against them is a whole 'nother thing) and was completed with the Berger fiasco (we're fighting them over there without ever being able to find out what they were up to over here).


It's been the same with me. It's hard to support your President when you can't be sure what side he's on.


35 posted on 03/21/2007 5:34:50 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The firing of the justices is a NON-issue. Period.


Agreed.


36 posted on 03/21/2007 5:36:03 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

The democrats know that a lot of us want him gone too and are just manufacturing a scandal to go with it. That way they can show their slack jawed supporters how effective they are.


37 posted on 03/21/2007 5:37:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Until yesterday, I was considering supporting Tom Tancredo for President. I favored Duncan Hunter, and two or three other candidates I could at least consider holding my nose and voting for.

Now, Tancredo is OFF my list. He appears to be a political opportunist at the expense of the current administration. Bush and Co. have been far from perfect, but to use an absolutely fake scandal created by Democrats as a political weapon to promote his own campaign is repugnant.

President Bush should tell Congress where to stuff their subpeona's -- and he should reserve especially potent venom for the likes of Tancredo.

Geez, what is it with Republicans anyway!?!


38 posted on 03/21/2007 5:46:24 AM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
I dont agree. I have felt Gonzales sucked from the beginning.

I am not a big Gonzales fan either, but you don't fire him when the Democrats tell you too. That only serves to empower the little weasles and encourage even worse behavior. After being driven over numerous times by the Democrats, it is a bit late for Bush to finally make a stand, but better late then never I suppose.

39 posted on 03/21/2007 5:49:44 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

"whenever they want one of their own to go"

Gonzales may be one of your own, but he dam sure isn't one of mine.


40 posted on 03/21/2007 5:54:16 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson