To: jwparkerjr
I agree with every word you wrote. What in hell is going on when the Supremes need to get involved in a car chase? Must be the influence of the demorats on the court and some ambulance chasing scumbag for a lawyer, and some dumbassed minority driving a cadillac in a dangerous manner. Go figure!
4 posted on
02/26/2007 5:06:32 AM PST by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: geezerwheezer
My concern is that we keep piling rules and restrictions on one side of the law and order situation. It's much easier to restrict the part f the system that we have some control over while the other side goes on playing with whatever rules suit them and they can get away with. Meanwhile, the good guys are forced to walk nearer and nearer the line that separates them from the bad guys. You will never convince me that in the years it's taken this case to make its way to the highest court in the nation that we haven't adversely impacted the way the first level defenders of our law and safety do their job.
To: geezerwheezer
What in hell is going on when the Supremes need to get involved in a car chase?
It's my understanding that the last court ruling in this case was in favor of the perp.
That is, the cops were at fault. The Supremes (I hope) will reverse.
70 posted on
02/28/2007 11:07:00 AM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson