To: Ellesu
It's my humble opinion that we, as a country, are in deep doo-doo when the nation's highest court is issuing opinions and rules affecting how a sheriff's deputy in Georgia attempts to stop and/or arrest a law breaker in a local jurisdiction.
To: jwparkerjr
I agree with every word you wrote. What in hell is going on when the Supremes need to get involved in a car chase? Must be the influence of the demorats on the court and some ambulance chasing scumbag for a lawyer, and some dumbassed minority driving a cadillac in a dangerous manner. Go figure!
4 posted on
02/26/2007 5:06:32 AM PST by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: jwparkerjr
Just wait until they decide between orange pop and orange juice.
17 posted on
02/26/2007 8:10:19 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: jwparkerjr
You're right, and Paul Madison effectively attacks the court for this very reason in a new article
here. Post it to FR if you think it is whorty.
35 posted on
02/27/2007 8:05:08 AM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: jwparkerjr
It's my humble opinion that we, as a country, are in deep doo-doo when the nation's highest court is issuing opinions and rules affecting how a sheriff's deputy in Georgia attempts to stop and/or arrest a law breaker in a local jurisdiction. That is very much correct.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson