Ron Paul Honored as "Taxpayers' Friend" for Tenth Consecutive Year

US House of Representatives -- Texas 14th District ^ | February 21, 2002 | US House Press Releases

[jmc813]

Ron Paul is a cut and run coward. He turned his back on the troops. When the going got tough, Ron left the troops without his support. Shameful. Ron Paul voted against the Iraq War Resolution authorizing force be used against Saddam. If Ronny the coward had his way, Saddam would stil be in power today to murder and rape the innocent.

This is a thread about Paul's exemplqary record on taxes. Would you care to add your thoughts on that?

[jrooney]

Read all the posts here - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1787992/posts

All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Are you aware the source you linked, Global Americana Institute, receives funds from a MoveOn.org entity, PAX AMERICANA?

I wasn't aware of that; but the identity of convicted Terrorist Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, as well as Al Dawa's role in various anti-American terrorist attacks, has been reported in numerous international news outlets.

If you think it important, I'll go ahead and re-source some of the links for my next Posting.

[jrooney]

He has a great record on taxes, so does GW. Same posters here that praise Ron for his taxes, don't GW. Why is that? Are lower taxes going to keep you alive? No. BTW, there are links provided by the poster about the Iraq war, thus makes this a thread about that too.

[jmc813]

I see. Conservative ideological consistency is only laudable if it does not interfere with Bush foreign policy.

It is an interesting exercise in futility to keep asking the Paul haters if there are any domestic policies in which they disagree with Paul on. They simply ignore your question and ramble on about his Iraq stances.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?

You find one or two sources you consider objectionable, and suddenly it's "All" my information?

Now you're just telling blatant lies, and you know it.

The identity of convicted Terrorist Jamal Jafaar Mohammed, as well as Al Dawa's role in various anti-American terrorist attacks, has been reported in numerous international news outlets. Since it will deprive you of such sleazy lies, I'll go ahead and re-source my links for my next Posting.

[Calpernia]

>>>If you think it important, I'll go ahead and re-source some of the links for my next Posting.

Left wing propaganda postings are very important. To be weeded out, that is.

[Irontank]

All his information comes from left wing sources about the Iraq war. Why would a supposed conservative do that?

Because those on the left and right are opoosed to this war...granted...there are a lot of leftist, hate-America types in the anti-war camp...but, certainly not all of us.

Someone once posted on here that the anti-war left was anti-war because they believe the rest of the world is too good for America...the anti-war right is anti-war because we believe America is too good for the rest of the world...and I think there is a lot of truth in that

[Calpernia]

How does one get nominated to Select Committees? (I honestly don't know). Are they appointed? Volunteer? Voted?

[jrooney]

What are your views on Ronald Reagan, since his image is posted abovve next to Ron Paul's? He sure as hell was no isolationist.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Left wing propaganda postings are very important. To be weeded out, that is.

Thanks for the good, and very circumspect, advice. It's much appreciated, I can't do this all by myself. ;-)

There's an abundance of sources of information on the terrorist acts of Jamal Jafaar Mohammed in particular and Al Dawa in general. I'll re-Source my links for the next Thread.

[jmc813]

He has a great record on taxes, so does GW. Same posters here that praise Ron for his taxes, don't GW. Why is that?

Hey, I'm the first one to bash Bush when he deserves it, but I think that he's been really good on taxes too. His spending has been borderline retarded though.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Well, in the case of Ron Paul's resolution, Congress would first have to establish a House POW/MIA select committee.

So far, Ron Paul and his co-sponsor Anna G. Eshoo are the only Congressmen pushing for this. The rest of the House is just sitting on it.

Letting our missing troops rot.

[Wormwood]

What are your views on Ronald Reagan, since his image is posted abovve next to Ron Paul's? He sure as hell was no isolationist.

This would be a good time for you to start calling Reagan a "Cut and Run Coward" for leaving Beirut in 1984.

I'd like to see that in really big red text, if you could.

[jrooney]

I have said it many times on other threads when their has been Ronald Reagan supporters bashing GW for his handling of the Iraq war. I think that was the bigeest failure by Ronald Reagan, and I have no problems bashing him over it.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Hey, I'm the first one to bash Bush when he deserves it, but I think that he's been really good on taxes too. His spending has been borderline retarded though.

Ditto and Ditto (Taxes & Spending)

[Calpernia]

>>>>It is an interesting exercise in futility to keep asking the Paul haters if there are any domestic policies in which they disagree with Paul on.

I'm very intrigued about his domestic policies. I'm extremely confused by his foreign. Hence is why I'm on the ping list and reading these threads.

[jrooney]

Those big red words exposing Ron Paul really bother you and his supporters because he is exposed for his votes on the WOT. I will keep doing it when I see fit.

[mysterio]

Ron Paul actively fights unConstitutional legislation. It's amazing that he is the exception rather than the rule.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

I have said it many times on other threads when their has been Ronald Reagan supporters bashing GW for his handling of the Iraq war. I think that was the bigeest failure by Ronald Reagan, and I have no problems bashing him over it.

Well, that answers your question of why I posted Ron Paul and Reagan together (well, that and the fact that Ron Paul was the leader of Ronald Reagan's electoral delegation from Texas in 1976).

Ron Paul believes in the wisdom of Ronald Reagan's approach to foreign policy, and you don't.

Ron Paul is a Reagan Republican, and you're not.