Rudy Beefs Up Political Team

National Journal ^ | 2/14/07

[justshutupandtakeit]

I am "blinded" by no such thing. Attempts to draw the message you believed sent is the real blindness. Guliani can reach out beyond the staunch conservatives you acknowledge to be few into the place where other voters are. No other candidate that I see can do this. They just reach smaller and smaller audiences.

But it doesn't even matter what I think but what does matter is that those opposed to him come up with someone who can beat him. And the simple fact is they cannot even come close.

[P-40]

And the simple fact is they cannot even come close.

The primary is a long, long time away and, aside from the name, few really know much about Guiliani. Once they get to know him...they won't like him very much.

[justshutupandtakeit]

That is an often repeated hope of the Rudyphobic. But, of course, it is false. Guliani's views are as well known IF NOT BETTER than those of any of his opponents. His abilities are also well known and it is those which will make him the nominee.

It is also false that the primaries are so far away. NOW is the time for fundraising and staffing to prepare for the earliest ones less than a year away. In fact, it is precisely because there is so little time that beating Rudy is going to be almost impossible. The only credible oppostion is McCain. There is NO one more conservative capable of even getting half the vote Rudy will.

[P-40]

That is an often repeated hope of the Rudyphobic.

Rudyphobic? Is that the best you can come up with? Why would anyone be afraid of that drag queen?

[justshutupandtakeit]

About all I see from his opponents is fear. What else would spur them into rhetorical overkill damaging to their side? Your comments are perfect examples.

[P-40]

About all I see from his opponents is fear.

Fear of what? Your candidate is a loon! Who is afraid of a loon? That you have to spam the forum with every random article about this loon is proof of that. Go post Rudy threads to Field & Stream or something.

[spunkets]

" In the real world, these boxes of energy are reduced to infinitely small dimension then integrated over the global and solar landscape in order to understand the dynamic impact of the energy sources and sinks.

The Sun is the only energy source. The heat generated from the Earth's interior can be considered fixed. The only relevant item of interest as far as GW is concerned is the magnitude of absorption from the polar molecule terms, from the atmosphere. That's what they want to control. If the concentration of polar molecules goes up too high, the Earth will get uncomfortably hot.

" Given that we do not have the capability to create such a model, it's unlikely that anyone can draw the definitive conclusion about what energy sources are responsible for which outcomes especially when energy manifests itself into things far beyond that of the photon or bird shot, and instead into the ecosystem which redirects energy into different forms.

There's plenty of information to create models. Simple calcs define the bounds of what's possible to observe. The model just outputs turbulent events, which are really only curiousities. The equilibrium calcs give the avg, and limits to the magnitude of any turbulence observed in model outputs. Since the energy change is only ~0.35%/^oC, that's all any turbulent event has available. That means the climate will be essentially the same is the temp changes one, or two degrees C. The details are irrelevant in the big picture.

[justshutupandtakeit]

"That you have to spam the forum with every random article about this loon is proof of that." If I had posted even ONE article your yammering might make a bit of sense. Since I haven't it is just more bilge.

The Spammers are those who post the same canned articles time after time believing they influence anyone to vote against him. More miserable failures. But the Rudyphobic won't stop.

The articles which are posted are hardly random but are indicative of what is actually happening, Guliani is making news and picking up allies. VERY conservative allies.

[P-40]

But the Rudyphobic won't stop.

If Judy's supporters have to resort to that bit of nonsense....then he is not worth my vote. I just don't vote for left-wing loons. And I did not say you personally were spamming the forum but your buddies sure are.

[P-40]

The Sun is the only energy source.

What about...love? :)

[justshutupandtakeit]

Posting articles is not "spamming". Articles which are outside FR's guidelines are not allowed.

[P-40]

Posting articles is not "spamming".

If every single article the liberal media comes up with talking about the 'great conservative' wonder Rudy G gets posted here, that is spam.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Most of the articles deal with conservatives endorsing Rudy or speeches he gives. You know "news" the stuff we never see from the obscure and unknown candidates.

I find it particularly hilarious that you are bitching about this when just your efforts alone has put this thread up close to two hundred replies and has kept it bumped. The same thing goes with other articles, their growth is as much from the Rudyphobic as the Rudyphilic.

[P-40]

Most of the articles deal with conservatives endorsing Rudy or speeches he gives.

And the articles come from primarily liberal sources...oddly enough.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Oh so you know of a bunch of NON-Liberal newspapers? When Guliani gives a speech to the California GOP it didn't happen unless the Manchester Guardian runs the story?

[P-40]

When Guliani gives a speech to the California GOP

It is not the fact that he gave a speech, it is what is written and said about the candidate. The same sources that are gushing all over Hilary and gushing all over Rudy. That should give you pause.

If you like him, fine. Vote for him. Don't expect my vote.

[justshutupandtakeit]

There is no "gushing" over Rudy mentioning that he spoke at a convention and received four standing ovations is not gushing unless it didn't happen.

The absence of a credible candidate more conservative than Rudy is not evidence of "gushing". The only gushing I see is the vitriol and bile gushing from the Rudyphobic.

[P-40]

Now you are only looking at one article...

[justshutupandtakeit]

But I have seen several here none of the gushing type.

[P-40]

But I have seen several here none of the gushing type.

No, you wouldn't.