A tractor and trailer brings labourers back from the Mvurwi farmland area of Zimbabwe in 2000. White Zimbabwean farmers are facing uncertainty about their future after the elapse of 45-day eviction notices.(AFP/File/Odd Andersen)
Posted on 02/05/2007 6:34:43 PM PST by NormsRevenge
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa - Zimbabwe's national security minister has told the country's last remaining white farmers that they will be jailed if they refuse to abide by a deadline that passed over the weekend for them to leave their farms, according to a newspaper report on Monday.
The official Chronicle newspaper quoted the minister Didymus Mutasa as saying police would be "unleashed" to deal with white farmers who ignored the eviction notice.
"Those farmers who do not comply with the orders to vacate the land will be dealt with severely," said the minister, known to be close to President Robert Mugabe. The deadline was on Saturday.
Farming officials said there were no immediate reports of arrests but they feared the worst.
Zimbabwe is suffering its worst economic crisis since independence, with acute shortages of hard currency, food, gasoline, medicines and essential imports. The meltdown is blamed largely on disruptions to the agriculture-based economy after the often violent seizures of thousands of white-owned commercial farms began in 2000.
Annual inflation is running at more than 1,000 percent, the highest in the world.
The U.S. State Department last year put Zimbabwe on a list of six countries where restrictions on rights were particularly severe, along with China, Cuba, Iran, Myanmar and North Korea.
There were around 4,500 white commercial farmers in Zimbabwe in 2000, when Mugabe launched the program of land seizures that has seen agricultural production plummet. Now only around 400 white farmers remain — and at least 150 of them were handed eviction letters in December giving them just 45 days to leave their land to make way for new black farmers.
Mugabe says land reform was necessary to correct colonial-era imbalances in ownership. The longtime Zimbabwean leader blames the more-than-40-percent drop in production on repeated drought and Western sanctions.
Once known as the breadbasket of southern Africa, Zimbabwe has seen its status reduced to an importer of its staple maize crop since land reforms were launched.
Critics say many of the new black farmers were allocated farms on the basis of political patronage rather than agricultural expertise, and lack the dedication and financial resources to make a success of farming.
The chairman of farming lobby group Justice for Agriculture, John Worsley-Worswick, said that white farmers were feeling "very exposed and very vulnerable."
Farming groups like the Commercial Farmers Union and Justice for Agriculture had told their members to stay on their land and risk arrest.
"There's ongoing pressure," Worsley-Worswick said by telephone from Harare. "We are expecting arrests as farmers go back today."
Mutasa said security officials would check this week on white farmers.
"It's the duty of police to see to it that those who don't abide by the laws are incarcerated," the minister was quoted as saying by the Bulawayo based newspaper.
Farmers were given a glimmer of hope last month when Ngoni Masoka, a senior official from the Lands Ministry, said they would be allowed to stay on to harvest crops they had planted "without any disruption in that process."
U.N. agencies estimate that about 4 million people are in need of food aid in Zimbabwe.
Last year, some 700,000 people lost their homes or livelihoods in a government demolition campaign aimed at street vendors, market stall holders and allegedly illegal housing.
Mugabe.
and the new head of the UN wants to stop the use of capital punishment or so I read.
Right after chucklenuts Mugabe gets his ...
A tractor and trailer brings labourers back from the Mvurwi farmland area of Zimbabwe in 2000. White Zimbabwean farmers are facing uncertainty about their future after the elapse of 45-day eviction notices.(AFP/File/Odd Andersen)
Zimbabwe children walk past an occupied farm on their way home from school in 2000. White Zimbabwean farmers, facing an uncertain future after the lapse of 45-day eviction notices, have said they hoped the government would allow them to harvest standing crops as promised.(AFP/File)
And we all know that Zimbabwe has advanced by leaps and bounds over the last several years./sarc
4 million people need food aid?
Why isn't the number 6 million? Unfortunately the only way zimbabwe is ever going to recover is by crashing first.
Anyone notice that these insane third world dictator types live along time? One would think that Mugabe could have slipped in a bathtub, or been on a chopper when it went down, but ohh no...
Evicted from their own farms for being white? I wonder if Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton will loudly denounce this blatant racism?
It wasn't much more than a few months ago, that Mugabe was trying to convince evicted farmers who had fled the country to return and "rent" the farms that were seized from them.
1 month ago.. Thanks!
Zimbabwe Poised To Welcome Back White Farmers ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1761887/posts
Posted by blam
On News/Activism ^ 01/03/2007 10:37:16 AM PST · 87 replies · 2,162+ views
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 1-3-2007 | Christopher Thompson
Zimbabwe poised to welcome back white farmers Christopher Thompson, Harare Wednesday January 3, 2007 Guardian Unlimited (UK) President Robert Mugabe's regime in Zimbabwe, which has mounted a six-year campaign to seize white-owned farms, is poised to allow hundreds of white farmers to return to their land as the country faces starvation and economic collapse. "There could be some 300 whites back on farms by the end of next year," Sam Moyo, a government land adviser, told the Guardian. "Most of them will be running commercial farms." Since November, 19 white farmers who lost ownership of their land have been granted...
Nobody cares about white farmers. Not France, England or the Unsited states, and forget entirely the UN.
The White man doesnt amount to squat. Now if this were black farmers the world would be in an uproar like they were when Apartheid was present.
That would be the liberal whites that helped Mugabe take over..
Most ALL the Decent White people left before 2000..
They are getting what they deserve, the white liberals left there...
Africa wins again...
I don't suppose we'll ever hear from Cathie Buckle any time soon.
When the white farmers are all gone these morons are going to
starve to death.
Thanks. I thought I was going nuts. Positive that I remembered that article and now this one says nope all whites must leave.
I would set fire to the farmhouse and barns on my way out.
Just a semantic thing, but these farmers, to their great misfortune, do NOT face an uncertain future. They stay, they'll be killed or imprisoned, more likely killed.
This lovely character was behind the farm invasions. He actually went by the name of Hitler!
The AIDS infected Chenjerai "Hitler" Hunzvi (October 23, 1949—June 4, 2001) born in Chiminya, a village in the Mashonaland province of Zimbabwe. Hunzvi is remembered for his militant leadership of the War Veterans Association, a group synonymous with Zimbabwe's chaotic land reform programme.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/1369182.stm
I wouldn't hope to trust..I'd say screw Mugabe if were them. Let him and his commies ROT!
Further proof that colonialism was a GOOD THING in Zimbabwe. Mugabe has proven beyond any doubt that his thugs and the liberals who backed his rise to power are incapable of creating anything but misery.
I think at this point I'd burn the fields and then leave.
I hope you're right. I was wondering why the hell ANY white farmers would still be taking their chances in Zimbabwe.
In Zimbabwe and Venezuela we have two shining examples of what things are like where liberals get their every wish. It's too bad the liberals aren't paying attention.
An ex post facto argument. Colonialism did not stop Mugabe. If anything, Mugabe's reign of terror is proof of why colonialism -- with its use of force to expropriate land -- was a bad thing.
Your reparationist garbage aside, the only things responsible for Mugabe are Mugabe himself and the white liberals like Jimmy Carter who enabled him. If only Salazar had lived another decade, Zimbabwe might be a viable place today.
You had been warned earlier today not to carry debates over from other threads.
I will add that misrepresenting my position in other debates is also bad form.
Now, to the substance of your post on this thread:
the only things responsible for Mugabe are Mugabe himself and the white liberals like Jimmy Carter who enabled him.
Why do you feel that the ripple effect of the 1970s colonialism has no effect on the contemporary Zimbabwean catastrophe, but Jimmy Carter does even though he left office within a year of the fall of the Rhodesian regime?
As I said, your reparationist garbage aside, the only things responsible for Mugabe are Mugabe himself and the white liberals like Jimmy Carter who enabled him. If only Salazar had lived another decade, Zimbabwe might be a viable place today.
Diversity is a one way street.
Dead Portuguese fascists, ineffectual American presidents ... every one of them had more influence on Mugabe than the colonial architects of the violent, chaotic, racist state he rules today.
According to you.
For me? Not one thin dime to feed this country when the mindless corruption reaps obvious future mass starvation...
Exactly.
They were handed something decent and ruined it.
It would be more accurate to say that they fought a dirty war against a tyrannical racist state, won, and are now continuing the tyrannical racist state with a different racism and a different ideology behind the tyranny.
Yes indeed. Even the most embittered critic of colonization or reparations proponent cannot deny that before Mugabe's reign Rhodesia was a stable, economically viable, and agriculturally productive region in the middle of a continent that is otherwise economically backwards, impoverished, frequently starving, and prone to constant political instability.
Another corrupt, horrific African regime to which Bono, Bill Gates and Bush want to send US taxpayer money.
Oh yeah. For white people, it was great.
Never said it was perfect. It was uncategorically better off than it is today though. Now the country is in ruin and everybody's starving.
No, it wasn't perfect. It wasn't even decent.
When the white farmers are all gone these morons are going to starve to death.
Well, maybe that is the idea. It looks like food product is returning to normal precolonial output. If they don't starve to death HIV/AIDS will kill off the population.
It's called communist population pruning.
Zimbabwe is now one of the worst affected countries in the world with an adult prevalence rate of 33.7% at the end of 2001. Population growth declined to 1.9% between 1995-2000 (the lowest in Africa) compared to the 2.5% anticipated without AIDS, and life expectancy has dropped to 42.9 years, compared with a potential of 65 years.
The growth rate is anticipated to drop even further to 0,3% in 2010, unless there is a drop in current rates of infection. As a result the population is forecast to stand at only 12 m by 2010. It was only in April 1999 that the government first appeared to acknowledge the severity of the threat.
No. Millions of starving people, an AIDS epidemic affecting 1/3rd of the population, and an Afrocentric marxist dictatorship is indecent. For all its faults Rhodesia never led to any of that, and actually ranks quite favorably in comparison.
Yep, and they do it with complete devastation. Rhodesia went from being one of the most stable and productive countries on a continent known for its basketcase countries to its single worst example of a basketcase country in barely two decades. The sole reason: an Afrocentric marxist guerrilla insurgent named Robert Mugabe and his liberal enablers.
Interesting observation.
Not true. The U.S. and UK have pretty well embargoed Zimbabwe, thankfully.
No, that's just a bad argument. Here's why:
The UK colonized both India and Rhodesia. Both India and Rhodesia overthrew their colonial governments.
India's economy and food production has grown since their independence. Rhodesia's, now Zimbabwe's economy and food production has shrunk...as have their life spans and standard of living.
Thus, one can not blame "colonialism" for India's prosperity or Zimbabwe's starvation. Both nations were colonized by the same people at the same time. Both replaced their colonial governments with indigenous ones...yet clearly both have seen different post-colonial paths with markedly different results between the two.
Logically, that means that *colonialism* is not common to their end results.
Blaming "colonialism" for Zimbabwe's current state would therefor be illogical.
Yes, like Jimmy Carter. His administration really sold out Rhodesia. Had Ford been president, the power might have gone to more moderate people. Democracy is not always the answer. Clueless people (as in Zimbabwe and Venezuela) can elect dictators, then there's no getting rid of them except with guns. Too bad Mugabe wasn't riddled with bullets at some point in the last nearly 30 years, but he wasn't. We can still hope this happens, but no one should be under any illusions about democracy in Africa, or its future.
It was better for everyone.
You got that right. Democracy is great except for its one fatal flaw - sometimes it elects a Hitler type to power. Liberals like Jihad Jimmy Carter always embrace the Hitlers as the "will of the people" no matter how horrible they truly are. The result is invariably the death of a whole bunch of innocent people.
Whatever problems Rhodesia had, one thing is certain. If it had been sustained, hundreds of thousands of people would not be dead or currently dying of AIDS and starvation there.
***Diversity is a one way street***
Let me fix that for you--
Diversity is a wrong way street.
Maybe it ranks favorably in comparison, but it was not decent.
Many people think that life in the USSR ranks favorably in comparison to Russia's current mafia-state. That does not make the USSR decent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.