Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America-bashing has gone far enough
IMRA/Gulf News ^ | 2-4-07 | Khalaf Al Habtoor

Posted on 02/04/2007 6:47:15 AM PST by SJackson

America-bashing has gone far enough
Gulf News - 04 February, 2007
Author: Khalaf Al Habtoor
www.gulfinthemedia.com/index.php?m=opinions&id=282583⟨=en

[IMRA: Khalaf Al Habtoor is the chief executive of Dubai's Al Habtoor Group. For a fascinating profile: www.ameinfo.com/40569.html ]

You can't tune in to an Arabic channel nowadays without coming across analysts, former politicians and ex-generals moaning and groaning about America and the West. Their views almost always paint the Middle East as a terminal victim of neo-imperialism, corporate greed and raw aggression.

In the world of the professional pundit we are always the innocent bystanders. The conflicts besetting this region are not of our making, they say. Everything is America's fault. Few ever come up with viable solutions.

To be fair the US government deserves much of the anger directed towards it for its ill-thought out Mideast policy. A recent BBC poll that sought the opinions of 26,000 people in 25 countries indicates 49 per cent feel the US plays a mainly negative role in today's world. Surprisingly, attitudes in Germany, France and Indonesia were least favourable.

But here's an interesting snippet. Some 57 per cent of Americans disapprove of the way their government handled the Iraq war.

Okay. So we know that Washington has blundered over Iraq but this shouldn't mean that everything America and its allies propose is automatically perceived as negative.

This trend has become so bad there is now a situation of them and us, which has led some Arab nations to cool relations with the West and cast around for new friends.

A January 25 Reuter's report was headlined "Gulf states seen shifting away from US assets". The fact is we must be careful what we wish for because it just might happen.

Let's ask ourselves these questions. Do we really want to sever or water down our alliances with the world's superpower? And if we were to do something that foolish what might be the economic, political and strategic consequences?

With regard to the GCC states it would be nice if we could emulate stand-alone, neutral Switzerland. The problem is we can't. Our countries are blessed - some might say cursed - with the world's most coveted resource: oil. Everyone wants a stake in it and we need to protect it. In truth, we cannot do this alone.

Fragile

So, like it or not, we need to cooperate with a friendly foreign power at least until such time as we are set-up militarily and technologically to stand on our own feet. Imperfect as it is, the US is the only superpower in town.

There are pretenders, countries that aim to muscle out the West and which are currently out to woo us. But their challenges are fragile and, in any case, their world view, ideologies and agendas are not ours.

To be painfully frank, if America and the West were to dump us we would soon be saying 'Come back, all is forgiven'.

If we no longer had the benefit of US satellites, for instance, our communications would be cut. If the West stopped supplying spare parts, our planes would be grounded; our hospital equipment left to rust.

Moreover if we work towards harming the US economy, in the end we will only be harming ourselves since our own economies are inter-related and inter-dependent and especially since our currencies are pegged with the dollar. I believe the time has come to stop the anti-Western rhetoric, and work with the West instead of against it.

With a sincere will, together we can strive towards a peaceful Iraq, which does not discriminate on sectarian lines. Together we can help Lebanon heal its war wounds and divisions. And together we can concentrate on bringing a Palestinian state to fruition.

This requires a massive change of heart on our side. We are hurt, rightly so, and it won't be easy but it's worth remembering this. In January 2009, the White House is due to receive new tenants. Whether these will be Republican or Democrat there will be a change in policy.

The US public proved their eagerness for a new direction in the November 2006 mid-term elections and presidential candidates are reflecting this new mood in their pre-campaign speeches.

One after the other they speak of the need for diplomacy and a new hearts and minds approach vis-a-vis this part of the world. In this case, we must not burn our boats.

In the meantime it's worth reflecting on the good things the US has done in the world and put the last few years in perspective as an out-of-character aberration.

Realistically speaking we need each other, so let's be courageous enough to offer Washington the hand of friendship. We need to transparently and professionally convey our concerns and requirements while emphasising that any new way of dealing with each another cannot be a one way street.

With our region imperiled and the future of our children at stake the road ahead demands an adult and sensible approach, not one based on revenge and grievance.

The nub of the issue is this. How do you envision the future of your country? Do you want to live in a free economy that offers you the freedom to choose your own lifestyle? If so, then the West is indispensable. And that's the bottom line.

We're at a crossroads. There are hard choices to be made. The responsibility lies with all of us to choose wisely and well.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2007 6:47:16 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

2 posted on 02/04/2007 6:47:50 AM PST by SJackson (Let a thousand flowers bloom and let all our rifles be aimed at the occupation, Abu Mazen 1/11/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This is a crock of crap.

He says the America bashing should stop, but he bashes throughout the screed.

Nothing more than muslim/islamist cultist BS.

3 posted on 02/04/2007 7:00:37 AM PST by OldSmaj (Death to islam. I am now and will always be, a sworn enemy of all things muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
the Middle East [is] a terminal victim of neo-imperialism, corporate greed and raw aggression.

If that were true, our imperialist forces could have conquered the entire Middle East decades ago. We could have held the world's oil deposits in our own hands and made all those Saudi petrol dollars our own. If we had done that, we wouldn't now be looking at a world that's spitting on our flag or making a bunch of noise about how tyrannical we are. We would see the backs of a bunch of heads as they all bowed to their overlords.

Instead, we invested billions of dollars into helping a tribe of illiterate bedouins develop oil fields which we then bought at land office prices. We sat on our hands and watched our ally in Iran overthrown by an extremist cult leader who approved the kidnapping of scores of innocent embassy workers. We stood by and watched murderers and savages kill Olympic athletes, crippled men, and airline passengers. We would have been perfectly justified in launching a full-scale war. We did nothing.

Finally, after multiple attempts to murder our citizens and soldiers -- some successful, some not -- we responded with force. And in short order, the cowards who had been screeching about our horrible injustices were either dead, bled, or fled. Then we moved into Iraq and did the same thing. You spit in the giant's face long enough, you have no room to complain when he kicks your ass.

"Imperialism?" Puhleeeze. You sniveling babies don't know the meaning of the word.

4 posted on 02/04/2007 7:06:21 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Surprisingly, attitudes in Germany, France and Indonesia were least favourable.

What's surprising about that?

Germany- kicked their @$$ twice in the last century, recently caught 'em with their fingers in the cookie jar.

France- saved their @$$ twice in the last century, recently caught 'em with their fingers in the cookie jar.

Indonesia- Islamic hellhole.

5 posted on 02/04/2007 7:08:55 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
A recent BBC poll that sought the opinions of 26,000 people in 25 countries indicates 49 per cent feel the US plays a mainly negative role in today's world.

Which means 51% - the majority - do NOT feel this way. I would have been more inclined to give this piece serious consideration had the author not deferred to some ridiculous poll. (spit)

Surprisingly, attitudes in Germany, France and Indonesia were least favourable.

SURPRISINGLY???? To whom?

6 posted on 02/04/2007 7:17:28 AM PST by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Isn't this author American Bashing? Yet, another misleading title by an American Basher.


7 posted on 02/04/2007 7:43:23 AM PST by Paige
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In the meantime it's worth reflecting on the good things the US has done in the world and put the last few years in perspective as an out-of-character aberration.

An out of character aberration?

The author tries to come across as wise and understanding of the relations between the middle-east and the west, especially the U.S., but most of what I got from this piece is that he's a dumb-ass and an idiot that fails to really understand what happened post 9/11 and pre-9/11 and post 9/11 Iraq. The reasons why we entered Iraq are well-documented and this writer just skipped around the whole Saddam vs middle-east and Saddam versus the U.S., and Saddam versus the UN, and Saddam versus the world issues.

Looking out for what's good for the region, the middle-east, is a great cause, but skipping on the real reasons for the Iraq war and the rest of the reasons for the middle-east always being in conflict is to be, well, less than honest.
8 posted on 02/04/2007 7:44:56 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In plain English...Don't piss off the Golden Goose.
Summary of FY 2006 Budget and Program Highlights
For FY 2006, the President is requesting appropriations under the Foreign Operations Subcommittee of $8,254,340,000 in discretionary funds for USAID-administered programs, including those programs jointly administered with the State Department, and associated management costs. This excludes $1.97 billion the President has requested for the Global HIV/AIDS Initiative, coordinated by the State Department. Also requested is $885,000,000 in P.L. 480 Title II, which is appropriated to the Department of Agriculture but is managed by USAID. The total request, including P.L. 480, is $9,139,340,000. Levels do not include any potential funding managed by USAID from the Millennium Challenge Account.
The tables and descriptions that follow provide further details in support of the budget request. Data provided in the tables are in thousands of dollars and cover a four-year period.
Table I lists all the accounts managed by USAID. Where there are transfers of some of these funds to other agencies, these levels are noted. Levels for FY 2003, FY 2004 and FY 2005 reflect rescissions. The FY 2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005 supplementals are listed as separate line items under the accounts that received these funds.
Tables II through XIV cover the individual USAID-managed accounts.

This is ONE year.
I know nobody will bother looking to see the vast amounts that are illustrated for the last 4 years, but I feel that I've done my part.

9 posted on 02/04/2007 7:45:09 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Our countries are blessed - some might say cursed - with the world's most coveted resource: oil.

Wrongo - Food is the most coveted resource; and I'm betting they need more than a few bites of what America produces.

Checkmate.

10 posted on 02/04/2007 7:48:12 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

see 10 - shorter than your example, but I'd say you and I are on the same page...


11 posted on 02/04/2007 7:49:51 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
From the link...
AGRICULTURE SUBCOMMITTEE
P.L. 480 Food for Peace Title II 2 1,440,575 1,184,967 1,173,041 885,000
12 posted on 02/04/2007 8:10:32 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Do we really want to sever or water down our alliances with the world's superpower? And if we were to do something that foolish what might be the economic, political and strategic consequences?

Khalaf at least got that part right. Nobody, and I mean no-bod-eee is going to like it if America is destroyed or forced to back down from the war on terror. The world then is at the mercy of France and Russia, and worse, islam. We all know that Putin and Cheric are fine upstanding gentlemen who have not a corrupt bone in their bodies....eh...and the muslims have bald facedly promised to kill us all.

When the lights go out in America, the lights go out all over the world. The thugs take over....not the brightest among us, but the biggest and meanest.

13 posted on 02/04/2007 8:11:04 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I would actually prefer our own Democrats to stop America-bashing first.


14 posted on 02/04/2007 8:12:27 AM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

By all means, let is forget the casus bellum. I mean the cause of the war that started in 1991 and which is only now being brought to a conclusion.


15 posted on 02/04/2007 9:07:42 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Wrongo - Food is the most coveted resource; and I'm betting they need more than a few bites of what America produces.

Very true, though they're probably more likely to let their citizens starve than we are to tolerate oil supply disruptions. Of course if they feel they're cursed with oil, they could give it away.

16 posted on 02/04/2007 9:55:06 AM PST by SJackson (Let a thousand flowers bloom and let all our rifles be aimed at the occupation, Abu Mazen 1/11/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
To be fair the US government deserves much of the anger directed towards it for its ill-thought out Mideast policy.

Ok, if he's going to undermine his own essay's premise early into the discussion, why finish the article? He's just admitted that the America-bashers have a valid point.

17 posted on 02/04/2007 10:11:01 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I would actually prefer our own Democrats to stop America-bashing first.

Good point . . . . and one that too many of us missed while refuting the author.

18 posted on 02/04/2007 10:15:20 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; All

Fox is running a new promo:

"America has problems; The problem is not America"

It's great to see that!


19 posted on 02/04/2007 11:17:00 AM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

America bashing *has* gone far enough. This particular article crosses the line.

God BLESS America! And God d*mn anyone who says otherwise.


20 posted on 02/04/2007 1:31:06 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson