Skip to comments.St Petersburg Police Slash Tents of the Homeless
Posted on 01/20/2007 10:12:26 AM PST by meg88
click here to read article
Where are all of these freebies for working citizens?
We should eat the homeless.
Unfortunately, the flesh is too tough and salty.
Where are all of these freebies for working citizens?Firstly, I hate camping or anything resembling camping (in particular, sleeping under a tent on hard or lumpy ground) so I don't feel I could ever opt for these kind of freebies ...
The police are the armed extension of the government. What the government tells them to do, they do. Keeping innocent people safe from criminals is not part of their job. Enforcing the administration's policies is.
Take a look here about Dignity Village in Portland, Oregon --
Apparently the "homeless" are politically active, too...
Gosh, remember those 8 years under Clinton where the homeless ceased to exist?
Destroying private property without paying retribution seems to be a growing police practice these days.
Sounds more like St. Petersburg Russia than St. Petersburg Florida!
The government no longer recognizes private property.
A bus ticket to Key West, and have a barrier on the freeway preventing them back onto the mainland. House the whole homeless population out there...and wait for a huricane.
Sounds more like St. Petersburg Russia than St. Petersburg Florida!>>>>
I read nearly all this before it dawned on me that it was Floridiyay, not Rooskie.
The cops should all be arrested for destruction of property.
"Harmon said officers had legal authority to confiscate or destroy the tents because they are allowed to remove a hazard that lies on a right of way, which is city property."
They had no legal authority to do so. They had authority to arrest the vagrants maybe, not destroy and steal their property.
UNLESS illegals are involved.
Then they are solicitous beyond belief.
Be quicker to offer them all jobs. You'll never see them again. ;)
Criminy, could we get something like this started here?
You're a wise man Jeeves.
Just what do you expect them to do? Dirty old tents bring nothing at the auctions. Now, drug dealers' expensive cars are another matter...
They gays would have no part of that.
The worth of the item isn't the issue. It's the destruction of property without due process of law that causes me concern.
Maybe they would be accepted by the community if we required the homeless to wear gerbil costumes.
Oh my Lord those links are over the top. The out of the doorways one says :
Dignity is a formerly mobile tent city in Portland, Oregon, well on its way to becoming a green, sustainable, urban village.
and also that the tent city of vagabonds has begun hosting weekly craft lessons in conjunction with the local high schools ?
Flea publik eudkashion !!!!!
Sometimes, squatters get lucky and find a squat which the landlord seems to have really abandoned. Police and neighbors have been dealt with successfully and after many months the landlord still hasn't complained or been seen. In that case, squatters might start laying plans for gaining adverse possession.
I'm a little surprised at the responses posted These people are breaking the law
True. But "Feed the Homeless to the Hungry" has long been my solution to both problems.
I suppose you'd oppose my holiday "Burn a Bums Box" campaign too then eh ?
Were the vagrants loitering on public or private property?
The uproar about this tent city has been going on for quite a while. They were given a chance to move to other quarters.
Typical "Community Policing" orthodox BS! Its never the perp.;
The bartender shouldn't have served the drunk driver that last drink...
Its not the shooter, its the easy availability of guns that is the problem...
Detroit makes it too easy to steal cars...
Its the tents...not the lazy no-goods that inhabit them.
Not a problem so long as you coordinate it with the annual "Return them to their owners" shopping cart roundup.
It's like the same old story....keep feeding the ducks and they will never leave. This time they were told to leave after refusing to do so. I see very little wrong with that.
Boy any "homeless post" sure brings out the bleeding hearts posters...what a bunch of KOS Kids needing to grow up.
I would have thought it was already pretty well marinated and seasoned. Although I have heard if it's not drinking wine, then you shouldn't use it in cooking.
It says city.
If it is not legal to camp, the police can do whatever they need to to chase the people out. Especially when they are knowingly violating the law.
"the man, who gave only a first name of Mo(pbuh),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I hope they are taxed like the rest of us, especially for their housing/land.
"Another spot for the displaced tent dwellers was beside busy Martin Luther King Jr. Street."
Marked on every tourist map from Albany to Zanesville...
Why not? I'm pretty sure sausage is currently made from homeless pigs.
They can not confiscate, or destroy private property w/o specific statutory authority. They did not have that, so what they did is a crime. It was theft and destruction of property.
You said -- "I hope they are taxed like the rest of us, especially for their housing/land."
You know..., property taxes in Oregon are on the high side. But, there is no sales tax. I'd rather keep the sales tax out of Oregon, myself. And the voters have voted against it over the years.
But, even with property taxes being what they are in Oregon, I mean -- how much is property tax going to be on a place that has no "real value"? I mean, tax a shelter that is worth $50 and will cost $100 to tear down and carry away (if need be). Well, yes then, maybe tax them. Okay, let's see one nickel a year in property taxes, maybe a dime -- I don't know (at the going rate).
All right -- let's see if we can find one or two bottles on the street to pay my property taxes per year. That should do it.
Oh..., of course, you do know that Oregon was the beginning of the "Bottle Bill" -- where you have to charge deposit on pop bottles (anything with carbonation). They figured, when they began that law that the "bums" would be the ones who "cleaned up" the different areas of the state by picking up the bottles for deposit (and they do!).
Well, so much for property taxes...
This whole homeless tent city is the brainchild of a Rev. Bruce Wright.
He got people to donate the tents, in an attempt to set up a tent city and confront the city on the situation of the homeless.
The homeless in downtown St. Pete has been a huge problem because they flock to the city in the winter and disrupt downtown businesses. The are sanitation issues and property rights issues as they congregate downtown.
So this Rev. decided he was going to make a name for himself by "standing up" for the homeless. He's basically the instigator behind all the trouble. They even have picket lines of homeless demanding more "rights" in downtown St. Pete at the main entertainment complexes.
Here's the blog about the organization behind all the hub bub and organization of the homeless.
From the Rev.'s Bio: the groups he is affiliated with
He is a member in the following organizations: NAADAC, Poor Peoples Economic Human Rights Campaign, Critical Resistance, Every Church a Peace Church, League of Revolutionaries for a New America, St. Pete. For Peace, Food Not Bombs, Pinellas County Coalition for the Homeless, Homeless Legal Defense Fund, Pinellas County Juvenile Justice Council, St. Pete. Task Force on Homelessness, and the St. Petersburg Ministerial Association
The article mentions efforts to get them to move. I could have predicted they wouldn't work.
Given that these people are generally mentally ill, they can't be dealt with in normal ways.