Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim law reaches Britain
Daily Exress (UK) ^ | 11/30/2006 | David Pilditch

Posted on 11/30/2006 6:17:10 AM PST by Dark Skies

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2006 6:17:10 AM PST by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

“Somalis, wherever we live in the world, have our own law.”

Wonder if someone is checking what goes on in places such as Rochester, MN and in the huge Somali population in Vermont?


2 posted on 11/30/2006 6:20:54 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

slowly it will become Europe's new Court replacing the EU


3 posted on 11/30/2006 6:27:32 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

The Mohammadens tried this where I practice law in some domestic violence cases. The judges are quite clear and direct that they don't care about Islamic cultural traditions and "legal systems", advise them that in their courtrooms American law applies and then proceed to apply it with vigor. These attempts to apply Sharia around here seem to have died down.


4 posted on 11/30/2006 6:28:22 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Good to here.


5 posted on 11/30/2006 6:31:19 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Here=Hear. Dang spell check!


6 posted on 11/30/2006 6:32:41 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Last night politicians and religious leaders expressed outrage that sharia law is gaining an increasing foothold in our society.

You reap what you sow.
7 posted on 11/30/2006 6:35:20 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Most of europe (soon to be eurabia) is looking at this type of situation.

Want to lose sleep over this issue? Read "AMERICA ALONE" by Mark Steyn.


8 posted on 11/30/2006 6:38:09 AM PST by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! "On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" By David Grossman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Mrs Ivan

Is this really going on? If so are patriotic Brits as outraged as patriotic Americans are?


9 posted on 11/30/2006 6:39:23 AM PST by RockinRight (There's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes and dead armadillos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
There were a number of threads on this yesterday - as ever the Express is a long way behind everyone else!

BBC: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1745606/posts

Daily Telegraph: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1745531/posts

On the latter thread I remarked - "Contrary to what the article suggests, Muslim populations in the UK tend to be rather concentrated in specific parts of two or three large cities - the idea that Sharia courts now operate in most larger cities is to me, an exaggeration." (italics are quotes from the article).

10 posted on 11/30/2006 6:49:34 AM PST by Mrs Ivan (English, and damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Um, I do believe this violates British law. Why doesn't the ACLU represent the victims of sharia law in this obvious violation of their constitutional rights?


11 posted on 11/30/2006 6:50:14 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

I take it none of those judges were appointed by Clinton.

Congratulations on living in a place where judges still vigorously apply the law as it is given to them, instead of trying to be "progressive" for the Democrats.


12 posted on 11/30/2006 6:52:30 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

"in the huge Somali population in Vermont?"

I didn't know that such a population existed. Does that mean that all the former New York leftists (see Howard Dean) will now move out?


13 posted on 11/30/2006 6:54:29 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Um, I do believe this violates British law. Why doesn't the ACLU represent the victims of sharia law in this obvious violation of their constitutional rights?

Because the American Civil Liberties Union is primarily concerned with what goes on in America and doesn't hire many experts in UK constitutional rights and because in the story as published no British resident or American or even Somali was identified as a victim of sharia law?

14 posted on 11/30/2006 7:09:45 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scooby321; kittymyrib

<< slowly (Sharia) will become Europe's new Court replacing the EU >>

Slowly?

You kid yourself!

Inexorably, perhaps -- but not slowly.


15 posted on 11/30/2006 7:11:07 AM PST by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
The trial was conducted by community elders who ordered the attackers to pay compensation to the victim.

That is certainly reasonable, and hardly worth fretting over. If they start ordering physical punishment, violence, retribution or special punishment against women, then the government should intervene.

16 posted on 11/30/2006 7:17:16 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Dont have the ACLU here. Dont have a constitution as such either, so no probs :)


17 posted on 11/30/2006 7:38:29 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: montag813

And what if the attackers refuse?


18 posted on 11/30/2006 7:43:25 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Interest free loans and mortgages??? That would mean that if the bank was forced to do this, the interest they are NOT making would be shoved over onto the rest of us.
I feel this is totally discrimination.

I certainly hope some lawyer feels the same way and files suit for same.
If they want to live outside Islam countries, they can conform to the rules here.
If I were a banker-like my grandad was- I would refuse to do business with them. Interest free loans, indeed? What is next? Retailers selling to them at cost???
Must be tough to try and live in 2006 and use cave man mentality. My apologies to the cave man!!!


19 posted on 11/30/2006 8:17:02 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
I'm awaiting Arlen Specter to abandon his Scottish Law premise and start quoting Sharia Law........stranger things have happened...

FMCDH(BITS)

20 posted on 11/30/2006 9:57:58 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson