Skip to comments.
Judge strikes president's authority to designate terrorist groups
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^
| 11/28/06
| Linda Deutsch - ap
Posted on 11/28/2006 4:32:42 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-279 next last
To: NormsRevenge
"My black robe is in the cleaners.."
...and it should probably stay there to.
BTW, You didn't ask a serious question. Just some dribble about how they made up the list, which is completely irrelevant. The judge didn't question the list, just the vague wording.
To: lesser_satan
To: ARealMothersSonForever
"The power of the Executive to repel sudden attacks and to conduct wars (as the Commander In Chief) was not the subject of this judicial decision." It was the subject of your post #43 to which I replied and you then requested more info from me. I hope my effort gave you some satisfaction, however small.
The power of the president to conduct foreign affairs are able to be negatived by the Senate, not the Judiciary.
In this case that was not done.
Americans of course have no Constitutional right to interfere in other countries' affairs. None at all.
All power over foreign affairs resides in the federal government.
123
posted on
11/28/2006 6:41:46 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: NormsRevenge
Just unbelievable! Anyway the decision by this traitor liberal judge will be struck down in a higher court.
124
posted on
11/28/2006 6:41:59 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Bigh4u2
Go buy some clues........PLEASE!
To: NormsRevenge
Federal Judges are just a few rulings away from granting absolute power unto themselves.
126
posted on
11/28/2006 6:43:03 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a title that pisses you off more.)
To: NormsRevenge; All
Yes, Hey, all y'all... you want
this book.
Read this book:
Mark Steyn's America Alone: The end of the World as we Know It
To: Traditional Vet
Little just signed up newbie, the term RINO does NOT stand for anyone in the GOP who is NOT as far right as to be falling off the cliff!
To: NormsRevenge
Jeez. Bad day for the fight on terror.
TWO Clinton judges found in favor of terrorists.
129
posted on
11/28/2006 6:44:53 PM PST
by
Mr. Brightside
("You people make me stink!")
To: AmishDude
"Prove it. Just because you (or the judge) are too stupid to understand it"
But YOU understand it, don't you dude. Why don't you explain it to me. I would submit from your tone that you understand nothing. You haven't even thought about it.
To: NormsRevenge
It's the left's ballgame now, they will have to deal with the consequences and however many bodies start to pile up.
131
posted on
11/28/2006 6:49:24 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(Nature's answer to global warming---snow.)
To: Max Friedman
BTTT
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Three...you forgot Reagan!
To: babygene
134
posted on
11/28/2006 6:52:55 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... Kyl / Cornyn in '08)
To: babygene
I didn't make the assertion, you did. Please explain to us what confuses you.
135
posted on
11/28/2006 6:53:14 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Mark Steyn is my hero.)
To: samadams2000
I know I won't be popular but I agree with the judge. The law is too broad and allows the president to arbitrarily declare practically ANY group a 'terrorist organization'.
I could see the Hildebeast declaring that the NRA was a terrorist organization based on their support for gun rights.
136
posted on
11/28/2006 6:53:44 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: nopardons; Traditional Vet
He might be newer here than me, but his post seems reasonable. W is no more conservative than Kennedy was. The times have changed. Do you consider a Reagan Republican off the edge? Is Newt out of line?
To: bluetone006
Wrong thread and some of that crabgrass, is NOT allowed to be posted to FR!
Either stick to the thread's topic, or get off it.
To: PghBaldy
NOT that Congress is the CiC.We covered that a couple up. The CiC has power to conduct (wage) the war, the Congress is supposed to declare (and finance) wars. This is why Title 50, chapter 33 War Powers Resolution has withstood judicial scrutiny. Just because I think it gives Congress a cop-out does not make it unconstitutional ;)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sup_01_50_10_33.html
139
posted on
11/28/2006 6:54:24 PM PST
by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: NormsRevenge
I could have guessed she was a Clinton appointee. The Democrats are totally useless when it comes to governing. And their playing up the nonentity, Hillary, as President. I wouldn't vote for a Democrat for Sanitation Commissioner.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 261-279 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson