Skip to comments.
Senator calls UN climate meeting "brainwashing"
Reuters ^
| Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:09pm ET144
| Deborah Zabarenko, Environment Correspondent
Posted on 11/16/2006 11:52:46 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
EEEGGGADDDSSSS...a Republican that says it like it is....
(looking under table; under stairs; in closets) Is there another Republican that can say it like it is??????
2
posted on
11/16/2006 11:54:59 AM PST
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Typical dims want to fight fictional global warming but ignore the real global war on terror.
3
posted on
11/16/2006 11:56:30 AM PST
by
chaos_5
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"
We're brainstorming for your brainwashing"
4
posted on
11/16/2006 11:56:31 AM PST
by
jdm
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican who will step down as chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee in January,
Its sad to see him go.
A majority of scientists, many in the U.S. government, accept that global warming is spurred by human actions and the emission of greenhouse gases
Why am I not surprised? Flat earth theory, eugenics anyone??
5
posted on
11/16/2006 11:57:06 AM PST
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"The idea that the science (on global warming) is settled is altogether wrong." Yer WRONG!!!
6
posted on
11/16/2006 11:57:36 AM PST
by
evad
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Boxer and two other Democrats wrote a letter to Bush on Wednesday urging him to fight global warming by putting mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions.Best chance of that is to sew the pie holes shut on ALL dims.
Do her first.
7
posted on
11/16/2006 12:00:10 PM PST
by
evad
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A majority of scientists, many in the U.S. government, accept that global warming is spurred by human actions and the emission of greenhouse gases.Is Reuters able to back up this majority claim with data? I didn't think so.
8
posted on
11/16/2006 12:02:49 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't know what's in the water in Oklahoma, but more GOP politicians need to drink from it.
9
posted on
11/16/2006 12:04:16 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"brainwashing session"
Getting a group of people with a common mindset on this stupity is not brainwashing for their religion its just a church meeting.
10
posted on
11/16/2006 12:04:39 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
11
posted on
11/16/2006 12:08:00 PM PST
by
sbhitchc
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
12
posted on
11/16/2006 12:16:08 PM PST
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A majority of scientists, many in the U.S. government, accept that global warming is spurred by human actions and the emission of greenhouse gases. 1. Unsubstantiated hogwash. Typical Reuters.
2. Science by polling is not science.
13
posted on
11/16/2006 12:16:41 PM PST
by
kidd
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
>>>Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat with long-standing environmental credentials, will chair the committee. <<<
"Long standing environmental credentials" - well we know that she doesn't think there is an environmental impact when she passes gas.
Other than that, I am unaware of her "credentials".
14
posted on
11/16/2006 12:21:39 PM PST
by
HardStarboard
(Give Pelosi and Reid Enough Rope to Hang Themselves.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
15
posted on
11/16/2006 12:22:39 PM PST
by
Nancee
((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
To: kidd
>>Science by polling is not science.
Given the sample period over the age of the Earth is somewhere around 1 in 50 million, what better method to support the agenda then through opinion and consensus.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat with long-standing environmental credentials, will chair the committee.Does this mean it will soon be illegal to speak the truth about climate change?
17
posted on
11/16/2006 12:25:46 PM PST
by
GSWarrior
(To activate this tagline please contact the moderator.)
To: Paloma_55
To: chaos_5
Idiot. Glow-ball warning is observable, has been since the last ice age. The anthropogenic contribution is arguable. The 'fight' is fiction, framed by the MSM conspiracy of ignorance, you fellow-conspirator you.
Either we are equal or we are not. Good people should be armed where they will, with wits and guns. NRA KMA
19
posted on
11/16/2006 12:49:51 PM PST
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: proud_yank
A majority of scientists, . . . , accept 'Our future is the frog [spread-eagle, laboratory] . . .'
-Russian Nihilist (unnamed here although name could be furnished upon request by serious scientist.
20
posted on
11/16/2006 12:56:39 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson