Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My How Those Embryos Grow - A closer look at who it is some are intent on destroying.
National Review Online ^ | November 01, 2006 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 11/02/2006 12:04:28 AM PST by neverdem







My How Those Embryos Grow
A closer look at who it is some are intent on destroying.

By Deroy Murdock

Just 14 months old, fraternal twins EmmaLyn and Ian Burnett are oblivious to the embryonic stem-cell research (ESCR) controversy dominating their home state of Missouri. It’s too bad they are too young to respond to actor Michael J. Fox’s TV commercials endorsing Democratic Senate candidates Claire McCaskill in the Show-Me State and Ben Cardin in Maryland. If EmmaLyn and Ian could speak, they might help Fox and other Americans understand how ESCR literally kills living human beings just like them.

Just like you, EmmaLyn and Ian began as embryos. On their first day of life, their biological parents froze them for later implantation. EmmaLyn and Ian were suspended in liquid nitrogen for four years.

Facing pregnancy risks after having two kids, EmmaLyn and Ian’s Illinois-based natural parents relinquished their remaining embryos. Rather than toss them in the garbage, they placed them with the Fullerton, California-based Snowflakes Frozen Embryo Adoption Program.

“We pretty much had tried everything,” Anna Burnett, the kids’ 41-year-old mother, tells me from her Kansas City, Missouri, home. The then-public elementary-school music teacher and her network-engineer husband, Robert, had spent some five years trying to conceive a child. They finally turned to Snowflakes, which paired them with EmmaLyn, Ian, and their biological parents’ eight other cryopreserved embryos.



Anna and Robert Burnett of Kansas City, Missouri with their children, Ian and EmmaLyn, who spent four years as frozen embryos 

“Snowflakes matched us with 10 embryos from the same family,” says Robert, 43. Of these, four were defrosted in October 2004. The three viable ones were inserted in Anna’s uterus, but did not stick. In January 2005, they tried again. Of the remaining six embryos, four did not survive thawing, but, Robert explains, “they implanted the other two, and both of those took. We used all 10, and out of them, we got our twins.”

“They’re both healthy, well-adjusted kids,” Robert adds. “They both are normal for their age. We’re truly blessed.”

“It’s like a miracle,” says Anna, now a full-time mom. “After waiting so long and finally getting what you dreamed about, it’s great…They are very curious. They are real live, little people. And I want to see other embryos have that same chance.”

Stem-cell research advocates overlook stories like EmmaLyn and Ian’s. Michael J. Fox’s ads caricature ESCR critics as heartless Luddites who supposedly oppose all stem-cell research. This claim is as broad, unfair, and inaccurate as saying that anti-vivisectionists want to end all medical research.

Republicans Jim Talent of Missouri and Michael Steele of Maryland oppose ESCR in which living, albeit frozen, human embryos, like EmmaLyn and Ian, would be killed to extract their stem cells for research.

If these embryos were mere medical waste, opposing their use to cure serious diseases would be cruel and stupid. However, Fox and his allies don’t tell Americans that frozen embryos are being thawed, implanted, and delivered as boys and girls.

To date, Snowflakes has placed 2,013 embryos, of which 1,419 have been thawed; 762 were viable, 222 were transplanted, and 116 were born alive. Another 25 babies are gestating. Expanded embryo adoption would help more of these souls on ice graduate from frozen orphanages into the warm, loving arms of mothers and fathers.

ESRC boosters eagerly point to the 400,000 embryos frozen in America’s fertility clinics. However, the RAND Corporation reports that parents are using 88 percent of these embryos for impregnation. So only 48,000 are “surplus” — not 400,000. If the Burnetts’ 20-percent success rate applied to this population, it could yield perhaps 9,600 little boys and girls.

The Burnetts, Snowflakes, Talent, Steele, and virtually everyone else support research on adult- and umbilical-cord stem cells, which is no more ethically problematic than research on barbershop hair clippings. According to the Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics, adult- and cord-blood research already has created 72 treatments for diabetes, leukemia, and other ailments. In contrast, embryocidal inquiries, ballyhooed from Hollywood to Broadway, have not generated even one therapy. It remains the most immoral and least productive stem-cell laboratory technique.

One need not be religious or crazy about kids to recoil at the horror of fatally dissecting microscopic human beings for medical experiments.



Anna with her EmmaLyn and Ian

While footage of Michael J. Fox suffering Parkinson’s disease saddens TV viewers, his pain and that of other disease victims should be treated through adult- and umbilical cord-stem-cell research, not by grinding up future EmmaLyns and Ians into pills and powders.

— Deroy Murdock is a New York-based columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: escr; snowflakes; stemcells

1 posted on 11/02/2006 12:04:31 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; Peach; airborne; Asphalt; Dr. Scarpetta; I'm ALL Right!; StAnDeliver; ovrtaxt; ...

If you get pinged again to this thread, please don't get annoyed. Mr. Murdock reports some interesting numbers.


2 posted on 11/02/2006 12:15:25 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The picture of these darling children slams home the lesson that embryos are little people, not mere tissue.


3 posted on 11/02/2006 1:02:14 AM PST by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'm glad that these folks took a lemon, IVF, and made some lemonade out of it.

Something that I noted in the article was that the vast majority of embryos didn't make it through the process. A 20% survival rate is certainly better than the 0% rate the vivisectionists would seem to prefer, but that's still not a very good.




4 posted on 11/02/2006 2:33:05 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


5 posted on 11/02/2006 4:01:47 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Mr. Murdock sure puts the truth right out front.

Great article, Thanks


6 posted on 11/02/2006 5:15:10 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

speaking as a former embryo myself,....


7 posted on 11/02/2006 5:28:30 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
A 20% survival rate is certainly better than the 0% rate the vivisectionists would seem to prefer, but that's still not a very good.

But this does at least BEGIN to counter one of my biggest objections to IVF. In principal, I don't have a problem with IVF so long as EVERYTHING is being done to try to save ALL the embyros. (After all, embryos often don't survive after fertilzation in the womb - but I would like higher percentages than they currently have.)

However, I've always had a big problem with IVF in that, by necessity of the lack of precision of the technique, it creates too many "extra" embryos - and the extra embryos always seemed like they were being considered as "disposable". If, in fact, each embryo can be considered "wanted" (through programs like this), it's at least a step in the right direction.

Please don't think that this means that I am suddenly completely okay with IVF. I still have issues. However, this program does seem like a small step in the right direction. However, IVF won't be truly successful, in my book, until it achieves a better-than-nature survival rate for fertilized embryos, one at a time.
8 posted on 11/02/2006 5:51:35 AM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

One always has to ask the Michael J. Foxes how many embryos they and their spouses would be willing to create for the purpose of donating them to research.

Pro embryonic destruction advocates- be fruitful! Multiply! Then donate your own genetic embryos for lab experiments and get back to us on how proud of yourselves you feel for being "tissue donors"!


9 posted on 11/02/2006 6:11:16 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


10 posted on 11/02/2006 1:32:44 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Adoption is a wonderful thing. God bless them all!


11 posted on 11/02/2006 1:33:58 PM PST by jwalsh07 (Jhengis Johnny was against an apology before he was for it, sort of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


12 posted on 11/02/2006 1:35:07 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
A co-worker of mine came face to face with the very issue you discussed. After years of trying, they went to IVF. After around $50,000 and several trys, they had a Son.
The problem they faced was that in fact there were about 10 embryos left.
Although they had only planned on one child, they continued IVF until all implanted. Many more dollars, but they looked at it from the point of view that God had provided them a medical solution for their problem and they couldn't allow their offspring to be destroyed without putting their continued life back in God's hands. Unfortunately none of the others survived.
13 posted on 11/02/2006 1:50:19 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Michael J. Fox’s ads caricature ESCR critics as heartless Luddites who supposedly oppose all stem-cell research. This claim is as broad, unfair, and inaccurate as saying that anti-vivisectionists want to end all medical research.

I've heard this song before, any time someone opposes current *scientific* philosophy and thinking.

14 posted on 11/02/2006 3:06:59 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh! What beautiful children. What a wonderful blessing.


15 posted on 11/02/2006 3:23:28 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"One need not be religious or crazy about kids to recoil at the horror of fatally dissecting microscopic human beings for medical experiments." Deroy states this most eloquently, but democrats and dead-soul liberals will not allow embryos to be perceived as humans. Their magic thinking must be supported at all cost, even cannibalism.
16 posted on 11/02/2006 3:57:26 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

"However, this program does seem like a small step in the right direction."

I have mixed emotions about it. Of course I like the idea of children having the chance to be born rather than being fodder for medical experimentation. But there's also the danger of providing a ready rationalization for those who are considering the procedure, but who have some moral qualms about it. Providing the excuse of "well, we'll adopt out any extras" might push someone who would otherwise reject the procedure into being more receptive to the idea. Keep in mind that people who choose this expensive procedure are not in the most ideal emotional state. They're doing it because theyre desperate for the chance to have kids.

I also don't like the idea of the (presumably) pro-life folks who provide the wombs so these children can be born being, in effect, held hostage by the IVF industry. In the grand sense, the pro-life folks are being offered a Sophie's choice here: volunteer your wombs or these children die.


17 posted on 11/02/2006 3:59:53 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
In the grand sense, the pro-life folks are being offered a Sophie's choice here: volunteer your wombs or these children die.

How so? These folks want to have the children.

18 posted on 11/02/2006 5:59:15 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"How so? These folks want to have the children."

Taking the numbers at face value, a little over 2,000 embryos have been placed with an estimated 48,000 embryos available. And with more being added all the time.

That's a lot of embryos.

It's great that 2,000 have been placed, better still if it's with parents who couldn't otherwise have kids. However absent a significant increase in the adoption rate, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what will happen to the bulk of those embryos.


19 posted on 11/02/2006 6:35:29 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
However absent a significant increase in the adoption rate, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what will happen to the bulk of those embryos.

Other churches could put out the word. If coleus had not told me about Project Snowflake, I might not have read about it. It gets very little publicity.

20 posted on 11/02/2006 6:43:43 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Other churches could put out the word."

Let's hope they do. You're right, this doesn't get much publicity.


21 posted on 11/03/2006 3:47:16 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Great article. Thanks for posting.
22 posted on 11/03/2006 12:42:36 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson