Posted on 11/02/2006 12:04:28 AM PST by neverdem
|
If you get pinged again to this thread, please don't get annoyed. Mr. Murdock reports some interesting numbers.
The picture of these darling children slams home the lesson that embryos are little people, not mere tissue.
I'm glad that these folks took a lemon, IVF, and made some lemonade out of it.
Something that I noted in the article was that the vast majority of embryos didn't make it through the process. A 20% survival rate is certainly better than the 0% rate the vivisectionists would seem to prefer, but that's still not a very good.
bump
Mr. Murdock sure puts the truth right out front.
Great article, Thanks
speaking as a former embryo myself,....
One always has to ask the Michael J. Foxes how many embryos they and their spouses would be willing to create for the purpose of donating them to research.
Pro embryonic destruction advocates- be fruitful! Multiply! Then donate your own genetic embryos for lab experiments and get back to us on how proud of yourselves you feel for being "tissue donors"!
Adoption is a wonderful thing. God bless them all!
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
I've heard this song before, any time someone opposes current *scientific* philosophy and thinking.
Oh! What beautiful children. What a wonderful blessing.
"However, this program does seem like a small step in the right direction."
I have mixed emotions about it. Of course I like the idea of children having the chance to be born rather than being fodder for medical experimentation. But there's also the danger of providing a ready rationalization for those who are considering the procedure, but who have some moral qualms about it. Providing the excuse of "well, we'll adopt out any extras" might push someone who would otherwise reject the procedure into being more receptive to the idea. Keep in mind that people who choose this expensive procedure are not in the most ideal emotional state. They're doing it because theyre desperate for the chance to have kids.
I also don't like the idea of the (presumably) pro-life folks who provide the wombs so these children can be born being, in effect, held hostage by the IVF industry. In the grand sense, the pro-life folks are being offered a Sophie's choice here: volunteer your wombs or these children die.
How so? These folks want to have the children.
"How so? These folks want to have the children."
Taking the numbers at face value, a little over 2,000 embryos have been placed with an estimated 48,000 embryos available. And with more being added all the time.
That's a lot of embryos.
It's great that 2,000 have been placed, better still if it's with parents who couldn't otherwise have kids. However absent a significant increase in the adoption rate, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what will happen to the bulk of those embryos.
Other churches could put out the word. If coleus had not told me about Project Snowflake, I might not have read about it. It gets very little publicity.
"Other churches could put out the word."
Let's hope they do. You're right, this doesn't get much publicity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.