Skip to comments.
Foxing The Elephant: Are Republicans gaining votes because of Fox News? A study says that's likely
Toronto Star ^
| 10/29/2006
| Andrew Chung
Posted on 10/29/2006 1:27:05 PM PST by saveliberty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: All
Once again we get the medieval notion of modern liberals that people think as they are told.
Freedom of speech for me but not for thee -- that about sums it up
2
posted on
10/29/2006 1:28:28 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: saveliberty; nutmeg; All
It's Rupert Murdoch fault LOL!
3
posted on
10/29/2006 1:30:39 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: saveliberty
So, the Toronto Star thinks it's OK that the broadcast media are 95% leftist, but turns its beady little eyes on the other 5% for questioning it.
At best, Fox is neutral. It only looks conservative in contrast with the screaming liberals everywhere else.
4
posted on
10/29/2006 1:31:36 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: saveliberty
Good. Because the DSM is an arm of the Demon party. We have no free press.
Until Rush, Fox News, the blogosphere, and FR came along.
5
posted on
10/29/2006 1:32:17 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: saveliberty
Are Democrats gaining votes because of CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, & MSNBC News?
So Fox, by offering BOTH sides of the story equals Republican votes. So, they are saying that when people get fair and balanced news, they tend to vote Republican? What a concept!
6
posted on
10/29/2006 1:32:27 PM PST
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: saveliberty
" O'Reilly : "The left-wing press and the terrorists in Iraq have something in common," he said. "The terrorists want to damage the Bush administration, and so does the left-wing press."
=====
Exactly true!
7
posted on
10/29/2006 1:32:57 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(Vote Republican. The life you save may be your own. This is not an exaggeration.)
To: saveliberty
Look, Bill O'Reilly admits to being a partisan editorialist.
Since when did ABC News, or any other "non-partisan news" outlet, profess to be partisan except for now? We are being fed liberal tripe as "non-partisan news" and true conservatives are realizing it.
There is a huge, HUGE difference.
To: SevenofNine
LOL
If it were so easy to sway minds, why are the libs losing so many elections since 96?
Why pay for marketing campaigns when all you have to do is to have some nutcase on a stepladder shouting out what to buy? (LOL assuming a free society-- don't the libs say how much they value civil liberties?)
9
posted on
10/29/2006 1:34:22 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: Cicero
They are mad that they are losing market share and can't get it back
10
posted on
10/29/2006 1:35:01 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: saveliberty
"Except that few would agree that fairness is a virtue of O'Reilly or Fox News."
I love these cute throwaways. "We all know fox is biased and unfair, of course." Uh, no, *we* don't.
11
posted on
10/29/2006 1:35:26 PM PST
by
mbennett203
("Bulrog, a tough brute ninja who has dedicated his life to eradicating the world from hippies.")
To: saveliberty
I hope BOR also realizes that FOX it tilting more left lately. That's the reason I won't watch them. I don't watch TV news at all. Who needs it?
12
posted on
10/29/2006 1:36:02 PM PST
by
goresalooza
(Nurses Rock!)
To: Killborn
Sure the DSM are free-- they tell us what to do and we are supposed to comply. Now it's time for us to pay the fee to the NYT to read Maureen Dowd.......
Bwhahahahahahhahahahhahaha
13
posted on
10/29/2006 1:36:11 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: saveliberty
Don't forget that annoying Commerical HEAD ON OMG I want kill that adverstier who dream on that LOL!
14
posted on
10/29/2006 1:37:20 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: TommyDale
Evan Thomas said of the 2004 election that the old media coverage counted for as much as 15% points in the vote. He didn't back it up-- because he couldn't. But he was honest in pointing out that he and the HBM were liberal.
15
posted on
10/29/2006 1:37:44 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: saveliberty
...viewers will often see anchors Sean Hannity... Do you think they really didn't know that Hannity is not an anchor???
16
posted on
10/29/2006 1:38:40 PM PST
by
txroadkill
(Remember the Alamo and build a Freak'n fence already!!!)
To: FairOpinion
Right. And a win for Dems is victory for UBL and Al Qaeda. Another Western government who has lost the will to live.
17
posted on
10/29/2006 1:38:57 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: All
I always find it amusing when the Left, who have CNNNBCPBSABCMSNBCWAPONYT, whine about a couple conservative leaning outfits.
Apparently, they require 100% media saturation to prevail.
18
posted on
10/29/2006 1:39:34 PM PST
by
Mr. Buzzcut
(metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
To: ConservativeMind
What's fabulous is that the internet is outstripping the old media in the news cycles. This means that we don't have to be spoon fed tripe unless we so choose.
19
posted on
10/29/2006 1:40:11 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
To: saveliberty
One media source finally gives the GOP a fair shake, and the pissants begin to piss.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-179 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson