I'm smiling.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
10/11/2006 11:37:27 PM PDT by
MadIvan
To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...
2 posted on
10/11/2006 11:37:43 PM PDT by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
Why were they paying these people in the first place?
To: MadIvan
5 posted on
10/11/2006 11:42:54 PM PDT by
Dallas59
(Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
To: MadIvan
Don't you have a British ACLU? If not you can have ours, for free........LOL
8 posted on
10/11/2006 11:47:31 PM PDT by
marmar
(Although, I may look different then you....my blood still runs....RED, WHITE, @ BLUE.)
To: MadIvan
"If the Government is planning to merely seek out those organisations who will be less critical or parrot its policies, then this is not a strategy that will succeed. If that happens, the Government will lose credibility with the Muslim community." This threat to the British government is an act of terrorism in itself. It's a thinly veiled threat of islamofacist 'reprisals' if their efforts to alter British culture are thwarted. I don't know why the British government doesn't just round up these islamic antagonists and deport them all.
To: MadIvan
I hope this continues and you find much more to smile about.
13 posted on
10/11/2006 11:57:15 PM PDT by
Talking_Mouse
(wahhabi delenda est)
To: MadIvan
"I can't help wondering why those in leadership positions who say they want to achieve religious tolerance and a cohesive society would choose to boycott an event which marks, above all, our common humanity and respect for each other," she said. Oh heck. I just agreed with a member of the Labour party - again!
16 posted on
10/12/2006 12:18:29 AM PDT by
Mrs Ivan
(English, and damned proud of it.)
To: MadIvan
Like the venerable and wise man Popeye said; "I can't stands it, I can't stands it no more..."
21 posted on
10/12/2006 1:46:26 AM PDT by
FFIGHTER
(Character Matters!)
To: MadIvan
Inayat Bunglawala, the assistant general secretary of the MCB, accused the Government of trying to coax Muslim groups to back its unpopular foreign policies. "If the Government is planning to merely seek out those organisations who will be less critical or parrot its policies, then this is not a strategy that will succeed. If that happens, the Government will lose credibility with the Muslim community."
Okay, wait, I must be missing something. (a)Does the government HAVE ANY credibility with the Muslim Community? (b) If it loses the above alleged credibility, we care because .... why?
If you ambulatory cases of cranio-rectal insertion don't stop acting like idiots you will lose credbility with ME. NO, wait, you already lost it.

Ask me about my Bumper Sticker ....
24 posted on
10/12/2006 3:27:17 AM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Now we are all Massoud)
To: MadIvan
PING. What a great idea, this should rub off on our pols. Amen.
25 posted on
10/12/2006 4:12:06 AM PDT by
gakrak
("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
To: MadIvan
Has HM's Government been reminded that HM is also the fidei defensor? I say that tongue-in-cheek, but if you're going to maintain a monarch as the personification of the state's maiestas and sovereignty, and you style that monarch D.G. ... F.D., I would think defending the fides would be an important part of the state.
Anyhoo. This Muslim Council of Britain sounds like it's answerable not to the government or the people, but only to itself. If that's the case, it can fund itself. If you take the Queen's/President's/Space Pope's coin, you must be prepared to dance to her/his/its tune, or explain to her/him/it why you won't.
To: MadIvan
It's about damn time.
Hopefully over here across the pond our leaders can do the same.
32 posted on
10/12/2006 10:23:58 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
To: MadIvan
This is good news. I hope Miss Kelly has big bodyguards, especially about her neck.
Question, however: Why in the heck is the British government giving money to such groups in the first place?
34 posted on
10/12/2006 11:15:04 AM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
To: MadIvan
It's good to see them finally standing up. Guess they figured out that the Islamic faciests want them dead.
39 posted on
10/12/2006 5:37:41 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
To: MadIvan
41 posted on
10/13/2006 12:10:02 AM PDT by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: MadIvan
Hmmmm. They seem to be following the Australian lead. At least someone is waking up.
Miss Kelly's department alone allocates around £9 million a year to faith groups much of it to Muslim organisations.
I wonder how much of that goes to terrorism indirectly, but since money is fungible, whatever the faithful don't have to pony up is released for other purposes...
42 posted on
10/13/2006 12:25:32 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson