[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

WSJ's take on our new National ID card.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

PING!

[Dog Gone]

It's not technically a national ID card, but I'm sure many conservatives would gladly go through the hassle if it means weeding out the people who don't belong here.

[Ben Ficklin]

And the LEO said to John Q. Public, "show me your microchip".

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

Sometimes I think the MSM are afraid the rats could never win another election without the dead and illegals voting democrat.

[Carry_Okie]

Voters prefer the cost of verifying ID to the cost of providing illegals free education and medical care while many of them plot our destruction.

[caresistance]

"We doubt Mexicans willing to risk their lives crossing hundreds of miles of desert on foot care much about not being able to obtain a drivers' license once here."

Really.....why then has Gil Cedillo proposed a drivers license for illegals bill on 8 separate occasions here in California? Promising to do so again next year, after the latest failure. Somebody must care!!!!

[Uncle Hal]

I am a long time subscriber to the WSJ. They have consistently taken a liberal view on immigration, both legal and illegal. I do not think they have had any writer in their editorial pages that is tough on illegals.

[Grut]

WSJ's take on our new National ID card.

They're probably right. But I remain convinced that their stand on illegal immigration comes from their having big lawns.