Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foley Setup? - Part XIV - Putting it together
Macsminds ^ | 10.06.06 | MacRanger

Posted on 10/06/2006 8:24:11 AM PDT by Perdogg

Bit h/t to the Commenters at Just One Minute. We bloggers owe our best work to their diligence and tenacity. The following is a complilation of some what they found so far, of what just may be the key to getting to the bottom of a Democratic conspiracy in the Foley Setup.

As I previously posted here, there apparently was a promise of a book deal to pages by a Robin Kasaros. Googling her name brought about useful information such as she hosted “House Parties” back in 2005. No, not where you sell Tupperware, but the kind that like to talk about things like, “Impeaching the President”. This was found on uber Moonbat, and Air America Host Randi Rhoades website:

“Hi. Randi, Ambassador Joe Wilson and Cong John Conyers are all participating in house parties on Saturday to talk about Downing Street and Rovegate. You can find a link to attend or host one of the house parties on therandirhodesshow.com. More than 200 have already been planned everywhere from Buffalo to San Francisco, Sandpoint, Idaho to Rock Hill, South Carolina.

Here’s the full list of house parties planned so far.

Listed at the bottom of the page:

Robin Katsaros 12900 Atherton Ct. Los Altos Hills CA 94022.

On a another post on the Alumni website (Google cached), her response to the progress of the book was posted:

(Excerpt) Read more at macsmind.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: airamerica; bookdeal; bookdeals; bribery; burke; chriskatsaros; christopherkarasos; christopherkatsaros; communistparty; conyers; cpusa; crew; dakar; edmund; foley; foleysetup; gayprideday; georgetown; georgetownu; harryhay; hay; houseparties; jefferson; johnconyers; johnkerry; josephwilson; jowwilson; katsaros; kerry; losaltoshills; manboylove; mattachinesociety; nagin; nambla; nancypelosi; pelosi; randirhoades; raynagin; rhoades; robinkatsaros; samburke; samuelburke; senegal; sf; willgeer; williamjefferson; wordisout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last
macs the man!!!
1 posted on 10/06/2006 8:24:12 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
This should be headlined

"Pelosi linked to gay congressional page"


2 posted on 10/06/2006 8:26:20 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

((( ping )))


3 posted on 10/06/2006 8:27:29 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Now who is Robin? Well besides being supportive of the John Conyers agenda, you know “Get the majority, Impeach Bush”, her son is Christopher Karasos who was a congressional page who was appointed by Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

Just damn!

4 posted on 10/06/2006 8:27:50 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The problem is more basic. Foley became a Republican when he couldn't win as a Democrat in a conservative district. Was Foley more an opportunist than a conservative? The Democrats should be home to any group that defines themselves by what they do in bed. If you have to lie about who you are to be in either party, you're in the wrong party.


5 posted on 10/06/2006 8:28:04 AM PDT by GOPJ (The MSM, like Larry Flynt, care about scandals only when there's an "R" by the name...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

In other words, there is no room in the Republican party for a gay man?


6 posted on 10/06/2006 8:31:14 AM PDT by ER Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

I'm going to have to make me an organizational chart with all of these names to keep up:')


7 posted on 10/06/2006 8:31:42 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

BTTT


8 posted on 10/06/2006 8:32:03 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This should not have been excerpted. Please make sure you click the link to this post by Macranger. It is very telling. It is highly doubtful, if not impossible that Pelosi was not aware of this now. The popcorn trail leads right to her doorstep.
9 posted on 10/06/2006 8:32:12 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

LOL! No kidding!


10 posted on 10/06/2006 8:35:17 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Vast conspiracies related to SOME wing.

This was planned almost as well, and in the same depth, as the strike on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania, by al-Qaeda and Osama bin Ladin.

One can only marvel at the very audacity of the scheme, going under the very noses of the target of the attack, and coming over from the far horizon.


11 posted on 10/06/2006 8:35:26 AM PDT by alloysteel (In war, disproportionate force is the ONLY way to assure victory and subsequent peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

When, oh when is the MSM going to run this connection of coincidences?


12 posted on 10/06/2006 8:38:42 AM PDT by zeaal (SPREAD TRUTH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Thanks for the ping.


13 posted on 10/06/2006 8:39:21 AM PDT by Liz (The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

I think this topic has run its course and it's in the nation's best interests to get back to focus on the War on Terror.


14 posted on 10/06/2006 8:40:29 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Good, will you share?



15 posted on 10/06/2006 8:41:22 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Wow. So the gay son of the woman who was writing a book on pages (with a chapter of input from the pages themselves) worked as a page for Pelosi ? The input from this 'book' was also coming from the pages who were involved with Foley. You just cannot make up stuff better then this.
16 posted on 10/06/2006 8:42:11 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

It all makes sense that Foley was egged on....set up. The FBI literally told CREW they didnt' have enough to investigate with just the emails. They 'HAD' to get more dirt somehow. B@stards....they are just evil...


17 posted on 10/06/2006 8:42:11 AM PDT by Fawn (http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The Congressional page system costs millions of dollars a year to run.

Why do we need the page system in Washington? Just so we can have little rich kids (Bill Gates was a page for a year) who's families are politicaly connected get paid to go to school? All they are supposed to do is run paperwork back and forth between members of Congress. Big deal.

Too bad we don't have any real journalists in America. Because there is a lot more to this page thing. It's obvious that most of the "kids" that get in the program are those who's families have political connections. I bet moost of the pages that have been "picked" the last decade are almost all politically connected.

Above all this is the issue that members of Congress and their staffs are obviously screwing around with the pages. So it appears that it's way past time to get rid of this taxpayer funded daycare program.

The same thing goes for the White house intern program. The reasone to scuttle that is obvious:


18 posted on 10/06/2006 8:43:07 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (All your instant messages belong to us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
her son is Christopher Karasos who was a congressional page who was appointed by Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

Makes you wonder why she doesn't want the FBI involved?

19 posted on 10/06/2006 8:44:05 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The Dems will do anything to change the subject prior to the elections so they don't have to discuss the issues. They will lose big time if they tell the dummies who will vote for them what they plan to do -- raise taxes, obstruct any judicial appointments, begin impeachment proceedings for President Bush, Vice-President Cheney and look for ways to remove Secretary of State Rice and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld. They will make gay "marriage" legal and stop funding for the War on Terror.

Lets get the discussion back on the issues. That way the Dims lose fair and square from an informed electorate.
20 posted on 10/06/2006 8:45:10 AM PDT by kevinm13 (The Main Stream Media is dead! Fox News Channel and Freerepublic Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Call your Congressmen and tell them that ALL homosexual politicians must RESIGN NOW to protect the pages on Capitol Hill. Do it for the children!


21 posted on 10/06/2006 8:47:33 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Today we march, tomorrow we vote!" The illegal aliens won't be "staying home" on Nov. 7th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Could the 'Book Project' have been a metaphor for the 'Sting Operation' ?


22 posted on 10/06/2006 8:47:39 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
The problem is more basic. Foley became a Republican when he couldn't win as a Democrat in a conservative district. Was Foley more an opportunist than a conservative?

Sounds just like Mayor Bloomberg.

23 posted on 10/06/2006 8:49:30 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

bump


24 posted on 10/06/2006 8:49:45 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen
get back to focus on the War on Terror

We are dealing simultaneously with the terrorists 'within'. They wear masks and need to be uncovered.
25 posted on 10/06/2006 8:51:30 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

"get back to focus on the War on Terror"

>>
We are dealing simultaneously with the terrorists 'within'. They wear masks and need to be uncovered.
>>

Very proper of you, sir, and there will plenty of time to address that after Congress is held. Back to the War on Terror.


26 posted on 10/06/2006 8:53:18 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Has anyone in the media flat out asked Pelosi when she found out about this, and if so, what was her answer?


27 posted on 10/06/2006 8:53:37 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Great idea! The children and the taxpayer benefit - who could argue.


28 posted on 10/06/2006 8:54:54 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: jennyjenny

Sounds like a job for Drudge to once again scoop the MSM...

Who was Christopher Karasos? Who is his mom? Why pulled the strings to get Christopher his job?


30 posted on 10/06/2006 8:57:55 AM PDT by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Yeah....I bet Pelosi "thinks" that too.....LOL


31 posted on 10/06/2006 8:57:59 AM PDT by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Did I read yesterday Peolsi marches with NAMBLA in parades?


32 posted on 10/06/2006 8:58:39 AM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc

If the Republican Party hasn't learned a lesson from this fiasco then they are hopeless. I doubt if there is any way to keep gay congressmen out of the "Romper Room" and eventually getting burned by the MSM. From now on it will really be like having an Elephant in the room.


33 posted on 10/06/2006 8:58:48 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owen

How can the GOP drop it when slings and arrows have come their way?


34 posted on 10/06/2006 8:59:19 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: whitechristian

Foley bailed the instant this was released. He did it.


35 posted on 10/06/2006 8:59:40 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc
In other words, there is no room in the Republican party for a gay man?

A gay Republican will not have the same protection by the media afforded gay democrats. e.g. Gary Studds and Barney Frank.

Democrats are perceived as the gay party. So outing a gay Democrat is a dog bites man story. Uninteresting. But outing a gay Republican is a man bites dog story.

36 posted on 10/06/2006 9:01:00 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: whitechristian

"When will the truth be published?"

Please, you MUST start breathing again. It is not good to hold your breath for years on end. And the pigs will probably fly over first as well.


37 posted on 10/06/2006 9:01:46 AM PDT by alloysteel (In war, disproportionate force is the ONLY way to assure victory and subsequent peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Of course that's the reason Sweet Grandma Pelosi won't even go under oath - UNTIL SHE HAS TOO!!! She's sweating alot these days -


38 posted on 10/06/2006 9:01:57 AM PDT by caffe (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc; All
In other words, there is no room in the Republican party for a gay man?

The larger question is, "why do otherwise intelligent, reasoning adults seem to think that the term 'homo sapiens' means that our species naturally includes queers?"

"For a bunch of damn people who can't reproduce, there sure are gettin' to be a bunch of 'em, and we oughta be as concerned about it as we would about a termite infestation in a National Forest!"
- Wade "Festus" Burckhalter
39 posted on 10/06/2006 9:04:15 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc
re: no room in the Republican party for a gay man?

I didn't get that from the posting. My take was that Foley became a Republican, not because he espoused the party's values and beliefs, but rather to help him win political office in a conservative district.

I hope that's not what the poster meant. It would sadden me to think my party would consider anyone unwelcome solely on the basis of their sexual preference! I know many think it's wrong to be gay, to the extent of considering it a sin, but for me that's a matter to be taken up between the gay person and God when the time comes. A gay person's behavior can certainly cross the line in my mind when they engage in acts that endanger others, but simply being attracted to persons of the same sex rather than the opposite sex is hardly a problem.
40 posted on 10/06/2006 9:06:32 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

>>
slings and arrows etc
>>

Nothing to be dropped. The measurement of victory is the scoreboard. You can discuss how many total yards were achieved and how many of them were passing or rushing after you win.

Winning matters. You don't have to drop any subject. You just need to defer it.

The War On Terror threatens children with glowing craters where their schools used to be while they were sitting in them. That's more of a risk than distasteful emails.

Eyes on the Prize and stay on message. The WOT is the focus.


41 posted on 10/06/2006 9:13:07 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite

I remember seeing Pelosi riding in a Gay/Lesbian sponsored vehicle in the forst Clinton Inauguration parade.


42 posted on 10/06/2006 9:13:44 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc
there is no room in the Republican party for a gay man?

According to the rats, no. They wanted him 'out' and 'outed'. Your beef is with the rats, not the GOP.
43 posted on 10/06/2006 9:15:13 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Let me say again. Liberals don't seem to think through their schemes to carefully, do they? It's almost like they want to coin a correlation to the adage that the cover up is worse than the deed. In their case, the set up is worse than the deed.
44 posted on 10/06/2006 9:15:40 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny
"Has anyone in the media flat out asked Pelosi when she found out about this, and if so, what was her answer?"

Of course not. They are too busy trying to figure out how to smear the Republicans, rather than seek the truth.

45 posted on 10/06/2006 9:16:16 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Owen
That's more of a risk than distasteful emails

I totally agree.

You just need to defer it.

Defer it to when? After the elections sound good to you?
46 posted on 10/06/2006 9:20:58 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

>>
You just need to defer it.

Defer it to when? After the elections sound good to you?
>>

Bingo. A month will change nothing wrt criminal charges that might be deserved.

Eyes on the Prize. Win in November.


47 posted on 10/06/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Focus is on everything - not to worry.


48 posted on 10/06/2006 9:30:24 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ER Doc
In other words, there is no room in the Republican party for a gay man?

What good have they brought to the big tent?

49 posted on 10/06/2006 9:31:58 AM PDT by itsahoot (If the GOP does not do something about immigration, immigration will do something about the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Republican Red

Is this Robin's husband?

http://www.netsedgeonline.com/about.html


http://www.netsedgeonline.com/about.html#John%20Katsaros


http://goldengroup.typepad.com/inbox/2004/07/news_whats_goin.html

Monday, July 12, 2004
News: What's Going Out Your Email Door?


50 posted on 10/06/2006 9:46:53 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson