Pat Buchanan: Impeach Bush over illegal aliens

WorldNetDaily ^ | September 17, 2006

[nopardons]

They're ice skating in hell....I agree with your post. :-)

[nopardons]

Oh dear...you are SO wicked! LOL

[Peisistratus]

"We have 'bad' Islamists invading the world, including the US, and we make hard working Christian Mexicans THE priority problem?"

Apart from the criminal and tax aspect of the issue, we are engaged in a war with an enemy who utilizes asymmetric tactics and aims to kill our civilians. Leaving the border open as it is indicates either that the WOT is not taken seriously or their are more important issues to this Administration than the war.

"Instead of hunting down Mexican illegals we should concentrate on down hunting Islamists. Especially their Stateside teachers."

How do you know there aren't Islamists among those groups of illegals? In fact, we KNOW there are. What's your position on the Administration actively bringing in more Saudi "students" and sending them to, among other things, flight training?

[Peisistratus]

"Go read the rest of my posts."

I read a few.

"Gee n00b, tell me something I don't know. LOL"

After reading a few of your recent posts courtesy of your profile page, I really don't have enough time to tell you everything you don't know. Longevity on a website really doesn't mean you have more experience in a subject.

[freedomfiter2]

Take the blinders and the kneepads off. The stinking Commies were a far LESS threat, than the illegals were. Revisionist history is just not gonna fly around here.

Oh please. The commies make up about a third of the US. Even today, there aren't that many illegals. Besides, I was looking at it from a 1980's perspective.

[nopardons]

Oh great, you saw a few of my posts that were BTTT and troll trashing, which led you assume that I don't know much about anything. ROTFLOL

[nopardons]

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, from a 1980's perspective, when we were in the midst of the Cold War and America and the USSR were fighting by proxy only.

[Peisistratus]

"Oh great, you saw a few of my posts that were BTTT and troll trashing, which led you assume that I don't know much about anything. ROTFLOL"

Pot, meet kettle. You see a few posts you don't agree with and immediately conclude said poster is a troll.

[nopardons]

Trolls are easy to spot; especially when you know what to look for. Don't believe me? Ask any Viking Kitty ( of which I am one ) or the RBKA ( of which I am a founding member )crowd.

No pot, no kettle here, just a two month old member ( unless you are a retread ) who has delusions of adequacy.

[Peisistratus]

"Trolls are easy to spot; especially when you know what to look for. Don't believe me?"

Many would consider your tactics to be trollish themselves, if one were to go by the original definition from usenet.

"No pot, no kettle here, just a two month old member ( unless you are a retread ) who has delusions of adequacy."

Again, you equate being a member of a website longer with standing, experience, and knowledge. All your sign-up date means is that you joined earlier. That's it. That's all.

[freedomfiter2]

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, from a 1980's perspective, when we were in the midst of the Cold War and America and the USSR were fighting by proxy only.

If you want to ignore the takeover of the education system and an almost complete paradigm shift regarding socialism here in the US, I guess you could say there was no fighting on US soil. Soldiers would have done less long term damage though.

I'll give you the fact that we are currently being invaded by an enourmous army from a hostile nation and at least for the time being the illegals are a greater danger than the terrorists.

[nopardons]

The border patrol, in case you are unaware of the fact, aren't staked out at our airports.

In many places, unfortunately, communities, cities, and states do everything in their power, to shield illegals. An d believe it or not, it's not the big bad cheap labor moguls, who are doing this, but local politicians. Okay, so then you retort with the same old same old, that they are paying off the politicians, at every level. But it just isn't THAT "simple".

It isn't "treason"and throwing around that word, doesn't make you right; nor does it help you any in this debate.

Is Pat's blatant anti-Semitism the ONLY thing you you disagree with him about?

Please don't take Pat so seriously. He really doesn't mean a lot of the things he spouts off about. And it's really EASY for people with NO power at all, to say lots of ridiculous things, which as an elected official, they would NOT say and could NOT do.

How come nobody ever wanted to IMPEACH Reagan? After all, Reagan gave BLANKET AMNESTY to EVERYONE. Heck, you guys don't even want to talk about him and the BLANKET AMNESTY. LOL