Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laffey Takes Commanding Lead in Republican U. S. Senate Primary
RHode Island College ^ | Date Posted: August 31, 2006 | Rhode Island College

Posted on 08/31/2006 11:46:13 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-354 next last
To: .cnI redruM

41 posted on 08/31/2006 12:23:42 PM PDT by Gritty (From Clinton to Bush we have gone from open zippers to open borders - Norm Liebmann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I agree. Could this be attributed to the fact that in the debate the other day Chaffee said he opposed the death penalty EVEN FOR OSAMA BIN LADEN.

Unbelievable!
42 posted on 08/31/2006 12:26:38 PM PDT by no dems ("25 homicides a day committed by Illegals" Ted Poe (R-TX) Houston Hearings 8/16/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
But I sure will enjoy seeing Chafee get his fat rear kicked to the curb

Will you enjoy seeing a Democrat controlled Senate? If this wasn't such a serious matter, you would mere qualify for being silly. But with the Senate and House in the balance, your attitude is far more dangerous to our country.
43 posted on 08/31/2006 12:27:18 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
As Hugh Hewitt said in a recent book "Can you count to 51?"

Aaah, Hugh - the biggest RINO lover of them all. That book of his was easily the most infuriating "conservative" read I've ever had. Sure, give all your donations to the RSNC so they can pi$$ it away on people like Chafee. No thanks. Glad I only spent $4 on it at the local discount store.

Hugh is right about the need to get to 51, he just totally misses how to do it. He thinks we need to continually bend over for the RINO contingent.

Hugh is wrong - dead wrong. Here is the key:

GWB carried 30 states in 2004 (31 in 2000). If there are 30 red states capable of producing 60 GOP senators, why are we spending precious resources defending the Chafees, Snowes, Collins', and Specters of the world? Why doesn't the RNC concentrate instead focus on making sure we never see another 'Rat senator in places like North Dakota and Montana?

By doing so you may take some shortterm losses, but in the longterm you not only increase the # of senators from the current 55, in addition you are no longer held hostage by the RINOs. We have the numbers on our side.

Part of me thinks the GOP has no interest in flushing the RINOs - without them, they would have to govern in as conservative a fashion as they campaign.

Personally, I don't think they have any interest in doing that. They need someone to blame to cover their lack of conservative governance. Holding all three branches of government, the RINOs are their last excuse.

44 posted on 08/31/2006 12:27:46 PM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe (2nd Amendment - the reboot button on the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xcullen
Is this what is going on among the Republican primary voters up there?

Republican primary voters have obviously bought into the Looney Left's theory that purging the Party of those not sufficiently 'pure' is more important than winning the General Election.
45 posted on 08/31/2006 12:30:15 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch
Will you enjoy seeing a Democrat controlled Senate? If this wasn't such a serious matter, you would mere qualify for being silly. But with the Senate and House in the balance, your attitude is far more dangerous to our country.

Don't even go down that road with me .... I've been arguing to to keep a majority for YEARS

With that said .. Chafee is one republican we do not need

He votes Dem 99.9999% of the time

Chafee is worse then McCain

46 posted on 08/31/2006 12:31:22 PM PDT by Mo1 (Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: caresistance

What we need are not citizen legislators. Many of them have good ideals. But they don't really know what they're doing, and they're overmatched when they try to battle the Rat pros and the Rats' bureaucratic allies.

What we need are principled conservative career politicians who don't sell out -- or forget where they came from. Admittedly, there aren't many.


47 posted on 08/31/2006 12:31:35 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
Chafee will pull a Lieberman, and run as an independant just to screw the party.

I can see the conservative idiots are out today.

Unlike lamont, laffey has no chance at winning and unlike lieberman, chaffee has no chance of winning as an independent

Chaffee will not pull a lieberman and a RI loss puts the dems 1/6 the way to controlling the senate and all the judicial appointments that will follow.

48 posted on 08/31/2006 12:36:54 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

He worked as a farrier, not that there's anything wrong with that. We suspect he was kicked in the head by one two many horses. That explains the goofy expression on his face.


49 posted on 08/31/2006 12:38:10 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
What we need are principled conservative career politicians who don't sell out -- or forget where they came from. Admittedly, there aren't many.

I find there are many principled conservative politicians.

You meant to say there aren't many who agree with your litmus test issues.

50 posted on 08/31/2006 12:39:28 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch

Do you remember Jim Jeffords?


51 posted on 08/31/2006 12:40:34 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Most polls should him performing worse than Chaffee.

I think you meant to say "ALL polls should him performing worse than Chaffee and worse by a wide margin"

52 posted on 08/31/2006 12:41:25 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
He votes Dem 99.9999% of the time

this is a lie or a gross exageration to the point of being a lie or you are an idiot.

53 posted on 08/31/2006 12:42:35 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Could you list Chaffee's five most important votes in support of the adminsitration?


54 posted on 08/31/2006 12:43:52 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Great news in the wake of Ann Coulter's skewering of Lincoln Chaffe in yesterday's column. Rhode Island finally gets it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692769/posts


55 posted on 08/31/2006 12:43:56 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I've been following him for awhile and don't recall hearing/seeing anything about his support, or lack thereof, for Bush in the WoT.

As far as him being a conservative, he's a libertarian-esque fiscal conservative. I'm not sure about the social issues. He's also big on renewable energy but not a watermelon at all. For the NE voters he would really be as good as we could hope for and, IMHO, a sign of what type of Republican can win up there. Hopefully the country club Republicans in RI will rally around him if he beats their boy in the primary.


56 posted on 08/31/2006 12:44:02 PM PDT by BJClinton (What happens on Free Republic, stays on Google.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Chafee has every intention of switching to the 'Rats once we get to 50, so that he can obtain a Chairmanship or some other perks. Time to show this trash the door.


57 posted on 08/31/2006 12:44:23 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

You are defending Chaffee ???

Hey .. go for it


58 posted on 08/31/2006 12:44:26 PM PDT by Mo1 (Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
Too bad! Laffey is just a small town mayor.

Verses what? The entire state of Rhode Island is smaller than most cities.

59 posted on 08/31/2006 12:44:32 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
There are Democrats who are more supportive of GWB's policies than Lincoln Chaffage.

You can probably name less than 100 dem politicians nationwide and the democrat opponent in RI will not be on that list.

60 posted on 08/31/2006 12:44:37 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson