Skip to comments.
Laffey Takes Commanding Lead in Republican U. S. Senate Primary
RHode Island College ^
| Date Posted: August 31, 2006
| Rhode Island College
Posted on 08/31/2006 11:46:13 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-354 next last
To: .cnI redruM
Can Laffey win this fall?
21
posted on
08/31/2006 11:56:58 AM PDT
by
bybybill
(`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
To: .cnI redruM
There's *no* way....no way *whatsoever*...for a *real* Republican to win in RI.
In Novemeber,it will either be Chafee,who votes for us once in a while,or a *real* democRAT,who will never,*ever* vote with us.
That's the sad reality of the political landscape in New England today.
A Laffey victory in the primary will make some "purists" feel good,but it will prove to be a pyrric one next January.
22
posted on
08/31/2006 11:57:16 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
To: Dog Gone
Someone explain this to me. Chafee rarely supports Bush. Is Laffey saying he'd support Bush even less? It doesn't really matter ... the chances of getting a real conservative elected up there is very slim
But I sure will enjoy seeing Chafee get his fat rear kicked to the curb
23
posted on
08/31/2006 11:57:52 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: .cnI redruM
.............Oh, you mean like Lincoln Chafee who worked as a blacksmith before inheriting the Senate seat from his dad.................
Yeah, Chafee was also a small town mayor (Warwick) when his dad's seat was given to him.
I'll say it again - It's too bad that RI can't nominate someone who is up to the responsibilities of a Senator.
That goes both for Laffee, Chafee, John Reed, Patches, whoever!
24
posted on
08/31/2006 11:58:20 AM PDT
by
aShepard
(Maybe the UN should donate UNICEF proceeds to the Gates Foundation, and fold!)
To: bybybill
Honestly, I don't believe he can. What he can do is embarrass Sheldon Whorehouse on substantiative issues so badly that he won't be any better than a backbencher in DC. Oh, he can also retire the only GOP Senator to vote AGAINST the sitting President's reelection in 2004.
25
posted on
08/31/2006 12:01:11 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
(The investigation was a hoax. Fitz should be brought up on charges.)
To: .cnI redruM
bump
must have been the osama comment,
26
posted on
08/31/2006 12:01:54 PM PDT
by
CPT Clay
(Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
To: Dubya's fan
This seems to be good news.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
27
posted on
08/31/2006 12:03:37 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: .cnI redruM
I wouldn't.
Chaffee is good for one vote. The organizing of the Senate.
Beyond that, he can't be counted on.
As Hugh Hewitt said in a recent book "Can you count to 51?"
We need 51 votes to organize the Senate along GOP lines. Let's get the 51 votes and then we'll go from there.
Having said all that, I'm glad Laffey is ahead in the polls. The question is whether he can win in November. Most polls should him performing worse than Chaffee.
We'll have to see what happens...
To: twigs
Send a message to the winning RINO not to act like the losing lib RINO.
29
posted on
08/31/2006 12:08:25 PM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
To: .cnI redruM
Laffey is a better than Chafee, but barely. And my guess is he will lose RI. But the upside is getting rid of chafee.
30
posted on
08/31/2006 12:08:37 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: CedarDave
Good catch. The reporter smoked something... What a crock!!!
31
posted on
08/31/2006 12:10:38 PM PDT
by
Toidylop
To: Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
"Chafee will pull a Lieberman, and run as an independant just to screw the party."
It's too late for him to run as an independent, but if it was possible it would be the best thing that could possibly happen to us. In a two-man race, Laffey will be the underdog against Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse in November (as would Chafee if he manages to win the GOP primary), but if Chafee ran as an independent he would split the liberal vote with Whitehouse and Laffey would be elected to the Senate with 38%.
32
posted on
08/31/2006 12:13:15 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
To: shotgun ed
That Includes LINDSEY "WEAK kneed" GRAHAM.
To: aShepard
You forget that most Senators aren't up to their responsibilities anyway. That certainly includes Chafee.
Ideally, all Republican Senate candidates, especially challengers, would have statewide name recognition before they even run. Personally, I think all Senators should have experience as either a governor, a congressman, or something very, very distinguished in the private sector. But a mayor of even a medium-sized town, if that town has problems, has had valuable experience making things happen against Rat opposition -- or trying to. Laffey isn't ideally qualified, but I think he's more qualified than he may seem.
34
posted on
08/31/2006 12:17:37 PM PDT
by
California Patriot
("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
To: aShepard
"Laffey is just a small town mayor. It's too bad that RI can't come up with a pubbie candidate who's up to the responsibilities befitting a Senator."
Chaffee was a farrier. He tried on horse slippers.
To: aShepard
I would view this as a positive, considering what elitist career politicians have done to the country. Why not try real citizen legislators again?
To: .cnI redruM
The same thing needs to happen in Arizona.
37
posted on
08/31/2006 12:21:14 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(Look! It's a ELEPHANT!)
To: Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
It's too late for him to run as an independent.
To: .cnI redruM
The smell of victory. I'd rather actually have a DEM in the Senate than Lincoln Chaffage.
Victory, indeed. A Democrat controlled Senate would be a real victory for conservatives everywhere. /s
To: .cnI redruM
I'd like to know how the challenger stands on immigration issues. This is the single area where GW has failed miserably.
IIRC Bush actually campaigned for Chaffee, right? If such is the case, then maybe guilt by association really was at work here in the negative sense of attaching the President to a candidate. That could be good in this specific case, but bad elsewhere.
40
posted on
08/31/2006 12:23:20 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-354 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson