Posted on 08/18/2006 2:44:39 PM PDT by madprof98
One of the horrible things about Terri's case was that her family wanted to take over her guardianship and care, but dear Mikey and the court system wouldn't let them. So her Mom, Dad and brother had to stand by while the state dehydrated her to death over a two week period. It makes me furious every time I think about it.
Well said, my friend.
What she means is: Some lives are more worth taking than others.
That is simply outrageous. I recently lost my mother after a long terminal illness, and while I hated to see her suffer, and it was a pain at times, I had no regrets about helping take care of her, not even when I was actually doing it. I wasn't an obligation or a duty, it was because I cared about her and wanted to help however I could.
Hmm, Nazi (euthanasia) redux. Evil, indeed.
The logic is: if a person is a dependent, the 'caregiver' can decide whether the dependent deserves to live or not. How about a baby or a todler? Many times, they're more than simply nuisance. And if for sure they're not going to look after the parents whatsoever, the parents can terminate them anytime they want.
I wonder if she's for or against death penalty.
She is angry at having to take care of her mother? Lucky her MOM didn't feel that way. What a worthless piece of dog poop. I might vote that her life is less worth living than some....
Agreed, its how she's looks at it from her self centered universe - does she think everyone who cares for those who cannot care for themselves - be they babies or elderly- are all trapped?
And doesn't she live in a socialist paradise? Aren't there places to dump dear old mom and let the state care for her?
What does her mother say to all this?
Talk about inflicting your views on other people.
Sad, really. The only real growing I've ever done, the most fufilled I've ever been, the times I've felt the most meaning in my life, were those times that I cared for someone who was totally dependent on me.
A real burden would be not having someone to care for and love.
She's mentioned as a popular BBC radio announcer. Surely she makes reasonably good money. Unlike many, she probably has the wherewithal to pay for care (at home or otherwise) for her mother. I can't understand her self-centered attitude. It's mean and heartless.
Libertarians don't believe in family being responsible for each other?
The lefties think the old people should be the government's problem or die. Not the libertarians.
You are FOS.
Not wanting to be married after the left has destroyed the essence of the family is a far cry from killing your parents off.
Terry Schiavo?
I was on that thread, I have it saved as well.
so if you can't have the hedonistic lifestyle of choice they you should be put to death if you want it or not.
It is amazing to me that Socialism strips hope from the average person, leaving nothing but disaster in the future.
These are the musings of a peasant.
Notice the only difference between that and the Islamic policy is the choice of lifestyle. Anyone who doesn't live in their way should die. This alliance between Western traitors and Islamic barbarians should not be overlooked in our security analysis.
Then turn them over to the state, as much as I hate to say that. But please do pay for their care. They paid for you, not only money, but blood, sweat, and tears (and probably a lot of tears). Really, its' the least you could do.
Evil evil people.
There will come a time when this woman is ill, old, and wondering 'do my children care if I'm alive?' The answer they owe her is 'yes.' The answer she deserves is 'no.'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.