Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

What the article actually says is that it is all Bush's fault.


8 posted on 08/14/2006 10:23:10 AM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cosine

"The activist shareholders are—not dissimilar to the Bush White House—waging a press campaign against the Times. The dissidents—only Morgan Stanley Asset Management, with 5 percent, has taken a public stand, but Bruce Sherman's Private Capital Management, which forced Knight-Ridder into a sale, is one of the Times's largest shareholders—are claiming that the B shareholders, presiding over scandal, are being reckless with the Times's brand and with their stewardship of a national treasure."



The shareholders need to hold their feet to the fire.


17 posted on 08/14/2006 10:40:49 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson